Anantam IASPost · 17 April 2026

Covert Operations and Allegations Against India — Nijjar, Pannun & UPSC Notes (UPSC International Relations)

Study Notes · General Studies · GS II · International Relations

UPSC guide to covert operations and the Nijjar-Pannun allegations: Five Eyes friction, Canada fallout, US indictment, India's response and 2024-26 updates.

Since 2023, India has faced a series of allegations of extraterritorial covert activity from close partners — Canada (Nijjar killing), the United States (Pannun plot), and earlier cases in the UK, Europe and Gulf. The pattern has tested India's most consequential strategic partnerships and become a live UPSC GS-II theme on India's foreign relations, diaspora, terrorism and diplomatic protocol.

Why this topic matters

Cases in the public domain

Hardeep Singh Nijjar killing (Canada, June 2023)

Gurpatwant Singh Pannun plot (United States, Nov 2023)

Other cases referenced in reporting

The Five Eyes dimension

The Five Eyes is an intelligence-sharing alliance of Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the UK and the US. Canadian allegations were reportedly based on signals and human intelligence shared within Five Eyes channels.

Historical mistrust

India-Canada bilateral fallout

India's defence and framing

India's public position combines flat denial of policy-level sanction, willingness to investigate specifics, and counter-charges:

Impact on India's global standing

Strategic

Reputational

Institutional

What covert action looks like — conceptually

Latest developments (2024-26)

Way forward for India

  1. Consistent doctrine across friendly countries — avoid double standards (tough on Canada, cooperative with US).
  2. Credible domestic inquiry — parliamentary oversight, transparency on findings.
  3. Legal extradition pathways — demand reciprocal Canadian action on UAPA-designated fugitives.
  4. Diaspora engagement — isolate violent extremism without alienating the broader Sikh diaspora.
  5. Track-1.5 and backchannel diplomacy — resolve quietly where possible; avoid media-first positions.
  6. Multilateral engagement — through Interpol, UN bodies, and FATF on transnational organised crime.
  7. Clarify doctrine — publicly disavow extrajudicial killings abroad as state policy and codify this.

UPSC Relevance

GS-II: “Effect of policies and politics of developed and developing countries on India’s interests; Indian diaspora.” GS-III: Internal security; linkages between external actors and challenges to internal security.

Probable questions

Prelims trigger words — Nijjar case, Pannun indictment, Five Eyes, Sikhs for Justice, Khalistan Tiger Force, UAPA, Air India Kanishka bombing, Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.

The real test for India is not whether it can survive these allegations — it will — but whether it can use the episode to professionalise oversight, tighten legal doctrine and rebuild trust, without undermining the counter-terror tools that every major democracy uses.