Anantam IASCurrent Affairs · 20 September 2026

Secularism is a ‘modern’ concept, does not fit India’s tradition, says RSS chief

GS I · GS II · Indian Polity · Indian Society

Why in News ?

RSS chief has claimed secularism to be incompatible with Indian tradition.

UPSC Relevance

Mains, 

GS1, Secularism

GS2, Indian Constitution—Historical Underpinnings, Evolution, Features, Amendments, Significant Provisions and Basic Structure.

Comparison of the Indian Constitutional Scheme with that of Other Countries.

Definition and Core Concept of Secularism

Secularism is the political and social principle of separating government, state affairs, and public policy from religious institutions and religious dogma. Under a secular framework, the state remains neutral in matters of faith, ensuring equal treatment and legal protection for all individuals regardless of their religious beliefs or non-belief, while safeguarding individual freedom of thought, conscience, and worship.

Origin of Secularism in the West amidst modernity

Secularism in the Indian Constitution

Constitutional & Statutory Provisions reflecting Secular principles

Indian Secularism vs. Western Secularism

DimensionWestern SecularismIndian Secularism
Core PhilosophyMutual exclusion / strict separation (“wall of separation”).Equal respect and equal distance toward all faiths (Sarva Dharma Sambhava / Principled Distance).
State InterventionStrictly forbidden in religious affairs; state cannot alter religious practice.Allowed and encouraged for social reform (e.g., banning untouchability, temple entry reforms).
Rights FocusFocuses predominantly on individual rights and freedom from church authority.Dual focus on individual freedom of conscience and collective rights for religious minorities.
Financial/State SupportPublic funding or tax revenue cannot aid religious institutions or schools.State can provide non-discriminatory financial aid to religious minority educational institutions.
Historical ContextBorn out of conflict between Church and Nation-State.Designed to preserve unity and social cohesion in a deeply multi-religious, post-Partition society.

Unique sociological conditions in India necessitated this model.

  1. Pervasive Social Hierarchies: Indian religious traditions historically governed personal law, customs, and social order. Strict non-intervention would have shielded oppressive practices like untouchability and gender discrimination from statutory reform.
  2. Extreme Religious Pluralism: As the birthplace of Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and Sikhism, and home to large populations of Muslims, Christians, and Zoroastrians, India could not function under a cold exclusion of religion.
  3. Protection of Minorities: affirmative rights (such as managing minority educational institutions) were necessary to prevent majoritarian assimilation and instill confidence among minority groups post-Partition.
  4. Public Nature of Religion: Religion in India is deeply tied to community life and identity rather than remaining strictly a private affair.

Alignment with Indian Ethos

Proponents argue that secularism is deeply congruent with Indian tradition:

Critique and Debates

In conclusion, secularism as an institutional commitment to equal respect for all faiths (Sarva Dharma Sambhava) reflects Indian pluralistic values, while debates persist over its specific administrative and political implementations.

Practice MCQ 

Q. Consider the following statements regarding the concept of Secularism in India:

  1. Unlike Western secularism, the Indian model permits state intervention in religious practices for social reform.
  2. The term ‘Secular’ was part of the original Preamble in 1949.
  3. The Supreme Court recognized secularism as part of the Basic Structure in the S.R. Bommai case.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct? 

(a) 1 and 2 only 

(b) 1 and 3 only 

(c) 2 and 3 only 

(d) 1, 2, and 3

Answer: (b) 1 and 3 only

Practice Question 

Critically evaluate whether Indian secularism’s principle of ‘principled distance’ successfully balances social reform with religious freedom. ( 15 marks)