Israel-Palestine Conflict: History, Key Wars & India’s Position
Complete analysis of the Israel-Palestine conflict covering Balfour Declaration, UN Partition Plan, key wars, Oslo Accords, October 7 attack, ICJ case, and India's evolving position for UPSC.
The Israel-Palestine conflict is the longest-running territorial dispute in modern international relations. It has shaped the politics of the Middle East, tested the United Nations system, divided the Global South from the West, and forced India into one of its most delicate diplomatic balancing acts.
UPSC loves this topic. The 2024 Mains GS-II paper asked about India’s West Asia policy. Prelims has tested UN resolutions, Oslo Accords, and the two-state solution. After October 7, 2023, this is now a top-priority topic for both Prelims and Mains.
Every aspirant needs to know: the historical timeline, the legal framework, the current crisis, and India's evolving position.
Historical Background: How We Got Here
Ottoman Period to British Mandate
Palestine was part of the Ottoman Empire for 400 years until World War I. When the Ottomans lost, Britain gained control.
Balfour Declaration (November 2, 1917): British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour wrote to Lord Rothschild: "His Majesty's Government views with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people." This 67-word letter changed the Middle East forever. It made no mention of Palestinian Arab rights beyond "existing non-Jewish communities."
British Mandate (1920-1948): Britain administered Palestine under a League of Nations mandate. Jewish immigration surged, especially after the Holocaust. By 1947, Jews comprised about 33% of Palestine's population but owned roughly 7% of the land.
UN Partition Plan and Israel's Birth
UN General Assembly Resolution 181 (November 29, 1947): Proposed partitioning Palestine into a Jewish state (56% of land), an Arab state (43%), and an international zone for Jerusalem (corpus separatum). The Jewish leadership accepted. Arab states and Palestinian leaders rejected it, arguing it gave a minority population the majority of land.
May 14, 1948: Israel declared independence. The next day, five Arab states (Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon) attacked.
1948 Arab-Israeli War: Israel won, expanding its territory to 78% of historic Palestine (beyond the 56% allocated by the UN). This war created the Nakba ("catastrophe"): approximately 700,000 Palestinian Arabs were expelled or fled, becoming refugees. They and their descendants (now over 5.9 million registered with UNRWA) remain at the heart of the conflict.
Common student mistake: Writing that the conflict started in 1948. The roots go back to the Balfour Declaration (1917) and the tensions during the British Mandate period. UPSC expects historical depth.
Key Wars and UN Resolutions
| Year | Event | Outcome | Key Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1948 | Arab-Israeli War | Israel controls 78% of Palestine; Nakba (700,000 refugees) | UNGA 194 (right of return for refugees) |
| 1956 | Suez Crisis | Israel, UK, France attack Egypt over Suez Canal nationalization; US/USSR force withdrawal | Reinforced Third World solidarity against colonialism |
| 1967 | Six-Day War | Israel captures West Bank, Gaza, Golan Heights, Sinai Peninsula, East Jerusalem | UNSC Resolution 242 ("land for peace," withdrawal from occupied territories) |
| 1973 | Yom Kippur War | Egypt and Syria attack on Jewish holy day; initial Arab gains reversed; ceasefire | UNSC Resolution 338 (reaffirms 242, calls for negotiations) |
| 1978 | Camp David Accords | Egypt-Israel peace (Sadat-Begin, mediated by Carter) | Egypt first Arab state to recognize Israel; recovered Sinai |
| 1987 | First Intifada | Palestinian uprising in occupied territories (stones vs. bullets) | Internationalized Palestinian cause |
| 1993-95 | Oslo Accords | PLO-Israel mutual recognition; Palestinian Authority (PA) created | Two-state solution framework; Areas A, B, C division of West Bank |
| 2000 | Second Intifada | Triggered by Ariel Sharon's visit to Temple Mount; suicide bombings; Israeli military operations | Collapse of peace process |
UNSC Resolution 242: The Legal Foundation
Resolution 242 (1967) established two principles:
- Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the Six-Day War
- Right of every state in the area to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries
The deliberate ambiguity of "territories" vs "the territories" (no definite article in English) has been debated for decades. Arab states read it as withdrawal from all territories. Israel reads it as withdrawal from some territories, determined by negotiation.
Oslo Accords and the Two-State Framework
The Oslo Accords (1993-95) were the closest the world came to a solution:
- PLO recognized Israel's right to exist; Israel recognized PLO as representative of Palestinians
- Created the Palestinian Authority (PA) for self-governance
- Divided the West Bank into three zones: Area A (full PA control, 18%), Area B (PA civil control/Israeli security, 22%), Area C (full Israeli control, 60%)
- Final status issues deferred: Jerusalem, borders, refugees, settlements, water
The accords failed to produce a final agreement. Israeli PM Yitzhak Rabin was assassinated in 1995 by an Israeli extremist opposed to the peace process. Subsequent negotiations (Camp David 2000, Taba 2001, Annapolis 2007) collapsed over Jerusalem, refugees, and settlements.
Current Core Issues
Israeli Settlements
Over 700,000 Israeli settlers now live in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, in communities that the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled illegal in its 2004 advisory opinion. The settlements fragment Palestinian territory, making a contiguous Palestinian state increasingly difficult.
The settler population has grown from approximately 250,000 in 1993 (when Oslo was signed) to 700,000+ in 2024. This growth during the "peace process" undermines the two-state framework.
Gaza Blockade
Israel imposed a land, sea, and air blockade on Gaza in 2007 after Hamas (Palestinian Islamist movement, won 2006 elections, took full control of Gaza in 2007) seized power. The blockade restricts movement of people and goods. The UN has described Gaza as an "open-air prison" with 2.3 million residents in 365 sq km (one of the world's most densely populated areas).
Jerusalem
Israel claims unified Jerusalem as its capital (annexed East Jerusalem in 1980, unrecognized by most of the world). Palestinians claim East Jerusalem as the capital of a future Palestinian state. The Al-Aqsa Mosque/Temple Mount complex is the most sensitive flashpoint, sacred to both Muslims and Jews.
Right of Return
Palestinian refugees demand the right of return to homes lost in 1948 and 1967, based on UNGA Resolution 194. Israel rejects this as it would demographically overwhelm the Jewish state. UNRWA (UN Relief and Works Agency) has registered 5.9 million Palestinian refugees across Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, West Bank, and Gaza.
October 7, 2023: The Escalation
On October 7, 2023, Hamas launched an unprecedented attack on southern Israel from Gaza. Militants breached the border fence, killing approximately 1,200 Israelis (including civilians at a music festival and in kibbutzim) and taking 250+ hostages.
Israel's military response was massive. The IDF launched a sustained aerial and ground campaign in Gaza, resulting in over 40,000 Palestinian casualties by mid-2024, with massive displacement (1.9 million of Gaza's 2.3 million people displaced) and destruction of civilian infrastructure including hospitals, schools, and UN facilities.
ICJ Genocide Case
In January 2024, South Africa filed a case against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) under the Genocide Convention. The ICJ issued provisional measures ordering Israel to prevent acts of genocide, ensure humanitarian access, and preserve evidence. The case is ongoing. This is the most significant international legal challenge to Israel’s military operations.
Separately, the International Criminal Court (ICC) prosecutor sought arrest warrants for both Hamas leaders and Israeli officials for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity.
India's Position: The De-Hyphenation Strategy
India's approach to Israel-Palestine has undergone a fundamental transformation over seven decades.
Phase 1: Pro-Palestine (1947-1992)
- 1947: India voted against UN Partition Plan (Resolution 181)
- 1950: Recognized Israel but did not establish full diplomatic relations
- 1974: Recognized the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), one of the first non-Arab states to do so
- 1988: Recognized the State of Palestine
- India consistently voted with the Arab bloc at the UN, driven by Non-Aligned Movement solidarity, large Muslim population, and dependence on Gulf oil
Phase 2: De-Hyphenation (1992-Present)
- 1992: India established full diplomatic relations with Israel (embassies exchanged)
- 2003: PM Sharon visited India (first Israeli PM to do so)
- 2017: PM Modi became the first Indian PM to visit Israel (deliberately did not visit Palestine on the same trip, breaking tradition)
- 2018: PM Modi visited Palestine separately (Ramallah), completing the de-hyphenation signal
De-hyphenation means India treats its relationships with Israel and Palestine as separate bilateral tracks, not as a zero-sum equation. India can simultaneously:
- Purchase $1 billion+/year in Israeli defence equipment (drones, missiles, radar, Barak systems)
- Cooperate on agriculture (drip irrigation, desert farming), water technology, and cybersecurity
- Support the two-state solution at the UN
- Contribute to UNRWA and provide development assistance to Palestine
- Vote for Palestinian membership upgrades at the UN (India voted for Palestine's upgraded observer status in 2012 and the membership upgrade in 2024)
India's Response to October 7
India initially condemned the Hamas attack and expressed solidarity with Israel. PM Modi posted on social media: "Deeply shocked by the news of terrorist attacks in Israel. Our thoughts and prayers are with the innocent victims." This was notable for its directness.
However, as the Gaza military campaign intensified, India shifted to calling for restraint, protection of civilians, humanitarian access, and a two-state solution. India voted for several UNGA resolutions calling for a ceasefire.
Common student mistake: Calling India "pro-Israel" or "pro-Palestine." India's position is pro-India, calibrated to protect strategic interests (Israeli defence technology, Gulf oil, diaspora in West Asia, UN positioning) while maintaining principled support for Palestinian statehood.
Key Events Timeline with India's Response
| Year | Event | India's Response |
|---|---|---|
| 1947 | UN Partition Plan (Res. 181) | Voted against |
| 1948 | Israel's independence, Nakba | Did not recognize Israel immediately |
| 1950 | — | Recognized Israel (no full relations) |
| 1967 | Six-Day War, Res. 242 | Supported Arab position, called for withdrawal |
| 1974 | — | Recognized PLO |
| 1988 | — | Recognized State of Palestine |
| 1992 | — | Full diplomatic relations with Israel |
| 2017 | — | PM Modi visits Israel (first Indian PM) |
| 2023 | October 7 Hamas attack | Condemned terrorism, expressed solidarity with Israel |
| 2023-24 | Gaza military campaign | Called for restraint, civilian protection, ceasefire |
| 2024 | ICJ provisional measures | Did not comment directly; supported two-state solution |
| 2024 | Palestinian UN membership vote | Voted in favour |
India's Israel-Palestine policy reflects broader patterns in its foreign policy evolution. Read about India's external trade policy for the Gulf energy dependence angle, decolonization for understanding India's historical solidarity with colonized peoples, and the Cold War framework that shaped India's initial pro-Palestine stance through the Non-Aligned Movement.
The 2025 Gaza Peace Framework and the Board of Peace
After two years of war following the October 2023 escalation, a US-brokered peace framework moved the Gaza conflict from open hostilities into a fragile transitional phase. The plan paired a phased ceasefire and hostage-for-prisoner exchanges with a roadmap for the demilitarisation of Gaza, the staged withdrawal of Israeli forces, and the reconstruction and interim administration of the territory — deliberately sidestepping, for now, the harder question of permanent Palestinian statehood that the two-state framework still leaves unresolved.
The framework’s most distinctive feature is the Board of Peace, a transitional international governance body created to oversee Gaza’s interim administration, channel reconstruction funding, and supervise the handover to a reformed Palestinian technocratic authority. It is not a United Nations organ and is not chaired by the UN Secretary-General; it operates as a standalone transitional mechanism chaired by the US President, with a mix of states and institutions participating as members and observers. This distinction matters: the Board sits outside the UN system even though it draws on UN agencies for humanitarian delivery on the ground.
India’s role has been that of a cautious observer rather than a guarantor. India attended the inaugural meeting of the Board of Peace in Washington D.C. as an observer, consistent with its long-running de-hyphenation strategy — engaging constructively with the peace architecture while avoiding a binding stake in a contested transitional structure, and continuing to back a negotiated two-state outcome, humanitarian access, and reconstruction. For India, observer status keeps channels open to Israel, the Gulf states, and the Palestinian Authority simultaneously, without forcing a choice between them.
The framework remains fragile. Its durability depends on the ceasefire holding, on the Board of Peace establishing legitimacy with Palestinians who had no role in designing it, and on whether the interim arrangement becomes a genuine bridge to self-governance or hardens into an open-ended external administration. As a transitional body created outside the UN, the Board of Peace is best read as a stopgap governance experiment — one whose success or failure will shape whether the long-deferred two-state question can ever be reopened.
Watch on YouTube
Related video from the Anantam IAS YouTube channel.
Trump's Middle East Plan for Gaza
