Anantam IASPost · 16 April 2026

104th Amendment of Indian Constitution — SC/ST Reservation Extension & UPSC Polity Guide

Study Notes · General Studies · GS II · Indian Polity · Social Justice

Complete UPSC guide to the 104th Constitutional Amendment Act 2020 — extended SC/ST reservation in legislatures to 2030, removed Anglo-Indian seats, Article 334.

The 104th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2020 made two significant changes to the Indian Constitution: it extended the reservation of seats for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) in the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies by ten years (from 2020 to January 25, 2030), and it discontinued the provision for nomination of Anglo-Indian members to the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies. The amendment was passed by Parliament in December 2019 and received Presidential assent on January 25, 2020.

For UPSC, this amendment is a high-priority topic under Indian Polity (GS Paper II), covering reservation in legislatures, Article 334, and the treatment of the Anglo-Indian community.

Constitutional Background

104th Amendment of Indian Constitution — SC/ST Reservation Extension & UPSC Polity Guide — visual guide 1
Timeline of SC/ST reservation extensions from 1950 to 2030
SC/ST reservation has been extended by constitutional amendment every 10 years since 1960

Original Provisions

The Constitution of India, as adopted in 1950, made specific provisions for the political representation of SCs, STs, and the Anglo-Indian community:

ArticleOriginal Provision
Article 330Reservation of seats for SCs and STs in the Lok Sabha
Article 332Reservation of seats for SCs and STs in State Legislative Assemblies
Article 331Nomination of not more than 2 Anglo-Indian members to the Lok Sabha by the President
Article 333Nomination of 1 Anglo-Indian member to State Legislative Assemblies by the Governor
Article 334Set a time limit for the above reservations and nominations — originally 10 years (i.e., until 1960)

The Time Limit Under Article 334

104th Amendment of Indian Constitution — SC/ST Reservation Extension & UPSC Polity Guide — visual guide 2

The Constituent Assembly deliberately made the reservation of seats for SCs and STs temporary rather than permanent. Article 334 originally stated that the provisions of Articles 330, 332, 331, and 333 would cease to have effect on the expiration of ten years from the commencement of the Constitution (i.e., January 26, 1960).

The rationale was that reservations were a transitional measure — as social equality progressed, the need for reserved seats would diminish.

History of Extensions

Articles 330, 331, 332, 333, 334 — changes by 104th Amendment
Article 334 was amended while Anglo-Indian provisions under Articles 331 and 333 were allowed to lapse

However, every ten years since 1960, the reservation period has been extended through constitutional amendments:

AmendmentYearExtended UntilAlso Extended Anglo-Indian Nomination?
8th Amendment19601970Yes
23rd Amendment19691980Yes
45th Amendment19801990Yes
62nd Amendment19892000Yes
79th Amendment19992010Yes
95th Amendment20092020Yes
104th Amendment20202030No — Anglo-Indian nomination discontinued

What the 104th Amendment Changed

1. Extension of SC/ST Reservation (Articles 330 and 332)

The amendment substituted the words "seventy years" with "eighty years" in Article 334, thereby extending the reservation of seats for SCs and STs in the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies for another ten years, until January 25, 2030.

Key point: This extension applies only to reserved seats in legislatures (Lok Sabha and State Assemblies). It does not relate to reservations in government jobs and educational institutions, which are governed by separate provisions (Articles 15(4), 16(4), etc.) and have no such time limit.

2. Removal of Anglo-Indian Nomination (Articles 331 and 333)

For the first time since independence, the amendment did not extend the provision for nomination of Anglo-Indian members. It effectively removed Articles 331 and 333 from active operation by not including them in the extension clause of Article 334.

This means:

The Anglo-Indian Community

Who Are Anglo-Indians?

Article 366(2) of the Constitution defines an Anglo-Indian as: "a person whose father or any of whose other male progenitors in the male line is or was of European descent but who is domiciled within the territory of India and is or was born within such territory of parents habitually resident therein and not established there for temporary purposes only."

Why Was Nomination Discontinued?

The government's rationale for discontinuing Anglo-Indian nomination included:

ReasonDetail
Declining populationCensus data showed a very small Anglo-Indian population (estimated at less than 500,000, though exact figures are debated)
Adequate representationThe government argued Anglo-Indians could contest elections in general seats
Constitutional principleNomination undermined the democratic principle of elected representation
Delimitation basisThe Delimitation Commission based on the 2001 Census did not find a basis for continued separate representation

Criticism of the Removal

Critics argued that:

Article 334 — Text After the 104th Amendment

After the amendment, Article 334 reads (in effect):

"Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing provisions of this Part, the provisions of this Constitution relating to the reservation of seats for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in the House of the People and in the Legislative Assemblies of the States shall cease to have effect on the expiration of a period of eighty years from the commencement of this Constitution."

The references to Anglo-Indian nomination (Articles 331 and 333) were omitted from the operative clause.

How SC/ST Reservation in Legislatures Works

Lok Sabha

State Legislative Assemblies

Important Distinction

FeatureReservation in Legislatures (Art. 330/332)Reservation in Jobs/Education (Art. 15/16)
Time limitYes — Article 334 (currently until 2030)No time limit
Extended byConstitutional amendment required every 10 yearsNo extension needed
BasisPopulation proportion in constituenciesVaries — backwardness criteria

Significance of the 104th Amendment

  1. Continuity of political representation — SCs and STs continue to have guaranteed seats in Parliament and state legislatures, ensuring their political voice
  2. Historic discontinuation — first time since 1950 that a category of constitutional reservation/nomination was not extended
  3. Constitutional amendment procedure — the amendment was passed as an ordinary constitutional amendment (special majority in Parliament) without requiring ratification by state legislatures, since it did not affect the federal structure
  4. Debate on permanence — each extension raises the question of whether SC/ST reservation in legislatures should be made permanent rather than requiring decadal renewal

UPSC Relevance

GS Paper Mapping

PaperTopicConnection
GS Paper IIIndian Polity — Constitutional AmendmentsArticle 334, amendment procedure, reservation provisions
GS Paper IIIndian Polity — RepresentationSC/ST reservation in legislatures, Anglo-Indian representation
GS Paper IIGovernance — Social JusticePolitical empowerment of marginalised communities
GS Paper IIndian SocietyAnglo-Indian community, minority rights

Key Points for Prelims