GS Paper 4 practice questions for UPSC Mains 2026.

• The conflict is between two duties of the same officer, not between rules and compassion.
• Closing a remote non-compliant school moves children out of education rather than into a better school.
• The burden of literal enforcement is regressive, falling on the poorest and most remote children the RTE Act was written for.
• Non-enforcement also fails: safety standards protect children, and selective waivers become rent-seeking.
• Triage is the key move — structural safety, water, toilets and child protection are non-negotiable; playgrounds and record formats can be sequenced.
• Many deficiencies are the state's own default, and penalising a school for unfilled teacher posts is unjust.
• Principled discretion means deviating openly, for recorded reasons, against a deadline.

Open full model answer →

• The decisive fact is not empathy but that the teacher tutors the PA's own daughter — a conflict of interest.
• A PA has no locus in transfer decisions, so the channel itself corrupts the process regardless of merits.
• Article 14 arbitrariness: a benefit available only to those with access to the DM's office is by definition unequal.
• Empathy must be impartial to be a virtue; feeling for the person in the room while ignoring identical absent claims is proximity bias.
• The genuine remedy is a general district policy on teacher continuity for children with disabilities under the RPwD Act, 2016.
• The child's real need is assessment, an individualised education plan and a special educator, not one teacher's private tuition.
• The operative test: would this decision have been taken for a family with no connection to the DM's office?

Open full model answer →

• The claim is Peter Singer's, from 'Famine, Affluence and Morality' (1972), resting on the principle that we must prevent bad outcomes when the cost is not comparably important.
• The drowning-child case shows distance and the presence of other bystanders are not morally relevant differences.
• Duty is owed and claimable, its breach blameworthy; charity is supererogatory, praiseworthy to do but not wrong to omit.
• Reclassification changes the moral position of both parties: the beneficiary becomes a claim-holder, the non-giver a wrongdoer.
• Capacity already generates obligation in rescue duties and in the special obligations of doctors and public servants.
• Rights-based welfare exists because dignity requires claims rather than favours dependent on mood.
• The demandingness objection is met by the moderate form the question itself states — giving without significantly affecting one's own stability.

Open full model answer →

• Consent to a diagnostic laparoscopy is not consent to a therapeutic hysterectomy — scope of consent is the central issue.
• A relative's consent has no legal force for a competent adult; temporary unconsciousness under anaesthesia is not incapacity in the relevant sense.
• Samira Kohli v. Prabha Manchanda (2008) involved nearly identical facts and held the surgery unlawful.
• The emergency exception does not apply, since a suspected malignancy awaiting biopsy is serious but not immediately life-threatening.
• Dr Mansi's conduct was well-intentioned but wrong — she chose the convenient consent over the valid one.
• Removing a woman's uterus without her word engages reproductive autonomy and reflects the routing of women's decisions through family.
• Anticipatory pre-operative consent is the single step that would have prevented the entire dilemma.

Open full model answer →

• The core flaw is a feedback loop: the model is trained on arrest data, so it measures police attention rather than crime and confirms its own bias.
• Proxy discrimination through postcode, income and migration status defeats the claim that the algorithm is identity-blind.
• Preventive detention on statistical association inverts the presumption of innocence, punishing correlation rather than conduct.
• Residents cannot see, contest or correct what is recorded against them, which is a due-process failure independent of accuracy.
• Mass biometric capture of crowds engages the Puttaswamy proportionality test, and no Indian statute currently authorises it specifically.
• The recommended course separates uses: stop algorithmic preventive enforcement, retain the tool for post-crime investigation.
• An independent bias audit with error rates disaggregated by community, plus notice-and-correction rights, is what makes continued use defensible.

Open full model answer →

• This is an organised network, not individual venality, so individual punishment alone will not dismantle it.
• Non-chronological approvals are the documentary signature of sold discretion, and are already evidence on the record.
• The backlog is a separate public harm that must be relieved on its own timeline, not held hostage to the investigation.
• Fear among honest staff is the network's principal asset, so protecting them is an operational necessity rather than a kindness.
• A tout's product is queue-jumping; publishing the queue with dates destroys the product.
• Evidence-building should be routed to Vigilance or the ACB rather than run as an internal confrontation.
• Engaging the union on process reform first prevents later individual action being reframed as an attack on workers.

Open full model answer →

• The asymmetry is decisive: leakage is a financial loss to the state, exclusion is a hungry family, and the two errors are not commensurable.
• The false choice is between technology and discretion; the answer is structured discretion that leaves an audit trail.
• A mandatory exception register with reason, photograph and signature preserves both relief and auditability.
• Section 7 of the Aadhaar Act and the 2018 Aadhaar judgment already require that no genuine beneficiary be denied for authentication failure.
• Fingerprint failure correlates with manual labour, age and poverty, so an apparently uniform rule falls hardest on intended beneficiaries.
• Authentication is not verification of entitlement; conflating machine non-recognition with ineligibility has cost lives.
• Monitoring must track exclusion rates by shop, not only leakage, and treat high failure as a system defect.

Open full model answer →

• Impartiality has already failed because the rivalry has entered the administration and police, so restoring perceived neutrality is the precondition for everything else.
• Rajan's instinct to open the highway first is correct: it is the least contestable act and serves both communities equally.
• Requisitioning CRPF is defensible precisely because local forces are compromised, and should be framed publicly as neutrality rather than escalation.
• Selective FIRs are the fastest way to lose both communities; parallel incidents must be registered on the same standard.
• Publishing per-camp relief data converts an assurance of even-handedness into a verifiable fact.
• A communications shutdown fuels rumour; a single verified channel in both languages is the better instrument.
• Land claims, resource allocation and political representation are structural questions beyond a DM, to be documented and escalated rather than improvised.

Open full model answer →

• The decisive fact is Country B's support for guerrilla forces abroad, which makes diversion a foreseeable end-use risk rather than a speculative one.
• The case is framed as economics against ethics, but on these facts the ethical and strategic choices converge on Country A.
• A's R&D collaboration converts a one-time sale into a long-term capability partnership worth more than an advance payment.
• B's foreign military base and NPT non-signatory status create technology-exposure and proliferation risks.
• 'Someone else will sell anyway' is ethically empty and commercially weak, since B is negotiating elsewhere regardless.
• The long-term loan is a manageable commercial risk, addressable through export credit guarantees rather than a reason to refuse.
• Sequencing matters: legality, then end-use risk, then strategic value, then commercial terms — reversing it is how bad sales get approved.

Open full model answer →