Q.115 marks · 250w 14 min Easy
The Indian Constitution has provisions for holding joint session of the two Houses of the Parliament. Enumerate the occasions when this would normally happen and also the occasions when it cannot, with reason thereof.
Subtopic: Constitution & Polity · Parliament
Show model answer outline
Introduction → Article 108 mechanism and presiding arrangement → Occasions when a joint sitting is summoned: rejection, final disagreement, six-month lapse → Occasions when it cannot be held: Money Bills and Constitution Amendment Bills, with reasons → Instances of actual use → Conclusion
Key points- Article 108 — joint sitting summoned by the President to resolve deadlock on ordinary bills
- Three triggering occasions: rejection by the other House, final disagreement on amendments, six months' lapse without passage
- Speaker of the Lok Sabha presides (Article 118(4)); Deputy Speaker, then Deputy Chairman of Rajya Sabha in absence
- No joint sitting for Money Bills — Rajya Sabha has only 14-day recommendatory power, so deadlock cannot arise
- No joint sitting for Constitution Amendment Bills — Article 368 requires each House to pass separately by special majority, a federal safeguard
- Bill lapses if Lok Sabha dissolves before notification of joint sitting; a notified sitting survives dissolution
- Only three joint sittings held in practice, showing its role as a last-resort device