UPSC CSE 2026 Essay Paper Discussion
GS Paper 3 15 marks · 250w 14 min Medium

Explain how the Fiscal Health Index (FHI) can be used as a tool for assessing the fiscal performance of states in India. In what way would it encourage the states to adopt prudent and sustainable fiscal policies?

Subtopic: Indian Economy · Fiscal Health Index and cooperative fiscal federalism

Model answer outline

How to structure your answer

Introduction (NITI Aayog's FHI 2025) → how it assesses state fiscal performance: the five sub-indices → as a diagnostic and benchmarking tool → how it incentivizes prudent, sustainable fiscal policy → caveats → Conclusion
Full model answer

Written within the word limit

229 words · target 250 words · 14 min

Introduction

The Fiscal Health Index (FHI), released by NITI Aayog for the first time in January 2025, is a composite index that ranks major states on the soundness of their public finances, drawing largely on audited data from the Comptroller and Auditor General.

How the FHI Assesses Fiscal Performance

The index scores states across five sub-dimensions:

  • Quality of expenditure—the share going to development and capital outlay rather than committed/revenue spending.
  • Revenue mobilization—own tax and non-tax buoyancy and reduced dependence on transfers.
  • Fiscal prudence—containment of the fiscal and revenue deficits.
  • Debt index / debt sustainability—the debt-to-GSDP burden and its trajectory.

By aggregating these, the FHI offers a single, comparable snapshot of each state's fiscal soundness, turning scattered CAG data into an actionable diagnostic.

How It Encourages Prudent and Sustainable Policy

  • Benchmarking and peer pressure: transparent ranking triggers competitive federalism—laggard states are nudged to reform to climb the table.
  • Diagnostic targeting: sub-index scores reveal specific weaknesses (say, poor capital spending or high debt), guiding corrective action.
  • Accountability: public visibility raises the political cost of populist, unsustainable spending and off-budget borrowing.
  • Reward for quality spending: incentivizes a shift from freebies toward capital expenditure with higher multipliers.

Caveats and Conclusion

The FHI's value depends on timely, comparable data and must account for structural differences among states. Used well, it institutionalizes fiscal discipline and cooperative-competitive federalism, steering states toward debt sustainability and better-quality expenditure.

Key points

What an examiner expects to see

  • The Fiscal Health Index (FHI) was released by NITI Aayog for the first time in January 2025, ranking major states on fiscal soundness.
  • It draws largely on audited CAG data, converting scattered fiscal data into a single comparable diagnostic.
  • Sub-dimensions include quality of expenditure, revenue mobilization, fiscal prudence (deficit containment) and debt sustainability.
  • Quality of expenditure rewards development and capital outlay over committed/revenue spending with higher multipliers.
  • Transparent ranking triggers competitive federalism and peer pressure, nudging laggard states to reform.
  • Sub-index scores pinpoint specific weaknesses (capital spend, debt burden), enabling targeted correction.
  • Public visibility raises the political cost of populist spending and off-budget borrowing, promoting accountability.
  • Effectiveness depends on timely comparable data and adjusting for states' structural differences.
Examples to use

Concrete cases, schemes and judgments

  • NITI Aayog Fiscal Health Index 2025 (first edition, January 2025)
  • Use of Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) audited state finance data
  • Sub-indices: quality of expenditure, revenue mobilization, fiscal prudence, debt index, debt sustainability
  • FRBM framework and the shift from revenue spending/freebies toward capital expenditure
  • Competitive federalism echoed in NITI's other indices (SDG India Index, Aspirational Districts)
Keywords / terms

Terminology to weave into the answer

Fiscal Health Indexcompetitive federalismquality of expendituredebt sustainabilitycapital expenditure multiplierFRBM

Share this answer