UPSC CSE 2026 Essay Paper Discussion

Daily Digest · Sunday

14 December 2025 Current Affairs for UPSC

2 current affairs published on Sunday, 14 December 2025

14 December 2025 Current Affairs for UPSC — every Why-in-News article AnantamIAS published on Sunday, 14 December 2025, broken down with Why in News?, the exact GS paper it feeds, sub-topic mapping, MCQ-ready facts and a UPSC-style practice question. 2 articles in total, covering Polity, Economy, Environment, S&T, IR, Geography, History, Society and Internal Security — the same Why-in-News + GS-paper-mapping + practice-question format the Compass uses across every daily digest on the site.

Daily current affairs for UPSC is where new material enters your prep stream. Read this 14 December 2025 digest end-to-end in 25–35 minutes, attempt the practice question at the foot of each article (it's MCQ for some, 10/15-marker for others), then bookmark the entries that fall inside your active revision window. Everything stays cross-linked: tap any subject pill to jump to that subject's hub, or use the table of contents above to skip straight to a specific story.

Use this page three ways. Read sequentially for a one-sitting scan of everything that mattered on 14 December 2025. Download the 14 December 2025 PDF below for offline study or print revision. Or use the December 2025 Current Affairs compilation to see this day in the month's full context. For the previous day's reading, see 13 December 2025 Current Affairs; the next day's is 15 December 2025 Current Affairs.

Why we publish daily current affairs separately from the monthly compilation: daily is learning, monthly is revision. Use the daily page to add fresh material to your notes the day it breaks; come back to the December 2025 compilation 60 days before Prelims when the noise has settled and only the lasting takeaway is worth re-reading.

G20 Johannesburg Summit: Global South Agenda and India’s Role

Open article →Download PDF

Why in News?

The G20 Leaders’ Summit met in Johannesburg, South Africa, on November 22-23, 2025 — the first G20 summit ever hosted on the African continent. The theme was ‘Solidarity, Equality, Sustainability’, anchored in the African philosophy of Ubuntu (‘I am because we are’), and the meeting adopted a Leaders’ Declaration despite divisions among major economies.

The Johannesburg Declaration runs to 122 paragraphs and pushes a clear Global South agenda — scaling up climate finance, easing low-income-country debt, securing critical-mineral value chains, and reforming the UN Security Council and the multilateral financial architecture.

  • First-ever G20 summit on African soil; host and 2025 chair was South Africa.
  • Theme: Solidarity, Equality, Sustainability, framed around the Ubuntu philosophy.
  • A 122-paragraph Leaders’ Declaration was adopted, covering climate finance, debt, energy, food security and reform.
  • The African Union (AU) participated as a full G20 member — a status it won under India’s 2023 presidency.
  • Declaration recognised the need for USD 5.8-5.9 trillion in climate finance for developing countries before 2030.
  • Summit closed the South African presidency before the troika hands the chair to the next presidency.

The development matters in the context of:

  • Sits in a continuous Global South arc: Indonesia (2022) → India (2023) → Brazil (2024) → South Africa (2025), four developing-country presidencies in a row.
  • Tests whether the G20 can still produce a consensus Leaders’ Declaration amid US-China friction and great-power divergence on trade and climate.
  • Matters for India as a recurring agenda-setter for the Global South and the architect of the AU’s permanent G20 seat.
Editorial illustration of a global summit table encircling the African continent symbolising international cooperation
An illustration of the G20's Global South agenda, with cooperation centred on Africa. Illustration: AI-generated (Freepik)
G20 Johannesburg Summit: Global South Agenda and India's Role — quick facts

UPSC Relevance

Prelims Relevance

  • G20 is an informal grouping of 19 countries plus the European Union and (since 2023) the African Union.
  • G20 has no permanent secretariat; continuity is provided by the troika (past, present and incoming presidencies).
  • The 2025 troika: Brazil, South Africa and the incoming presidency.
  • AU became a permanent G20 member at the New Delhi Summit, 2023, under India’s presidency.
  • Johannesburg theme: Solidarity, Equality, Sustainability; rooted in Ubuntu.
  • Declaration backed the G20 Critical Minerals Framework (voluntary) and a Tropical Forest Forever Facility.
  • Reaffirmed the Paris Agreement and the 1.5C temperature goal.
  • Endorsed the Mission 300 platform — electricity for 300 million Africans by 2030.
  • Welcomed implementation of the 16th IMF quota increase and a new IMF Executive Board chair for Sub-Saharan Africa.
  • G20 grew out of the 1999 finance-ministers forum; leaders’ summits began in 2008.

Mains Relevance

GS Paper 2

  • G20 as a platform for India’s Global South leadership and reform of multilateral institutions.
  • Reform of the UN Security Council and the Bretton Woods architecture to reflect contemporary geopolitics.
  • Continuity of the developing-country G20 presidencies (India, Brazil, South Africa) and the troika mechanism.

GS Paper 3

  • Climate finance for developing countries and the ‘billions-to-trillions’ shift.
  • Critical-mineral value chains, local beneficiation and energy-transition security.

Essay

  • Solidarity over self-interest: can plurilateral forums still solve shared global problems?
  • The Global South finding its voice in a fragmenting world order.

Background and Context

What the G20 is

A premier forum for global economic cooperation, not a treaty body.

  • Members are 19 countries plus the European Union and the African Union, together representing the bulk of world GDP, trade and population.
  • It has no permanent secretariat or charter; the rotating presidency sets the agenda for one year.
  • Born of the 1999 Asian financial crisis as a finance-ministers’ grouping; upgraded to a leaders’ summit in 2008 after the global financial crisis.
  • Outcomes are non-binding Leaders’ Declarations — political commitments, not enforceable law.
G20 Johannesburg Summit: Global South Agenda and India's Role — exam lens

The troika and presidency continuity

With no secretariat, the G20 relies on a three-member troika to carry agendas forward.

  • The troika is the past, present and incoming presidency working together for continuity.
  • The 2025 troika paired Brazil (2024) and South Africa (2025) with the incoming chair.
  • This let Johannesburg build on New Delhi (2023) and Rio (2024) commitments rather than restart from scratch.
  • An unbroken run of developing-country hosts — Indonesia, India, Brazil, South Africa — gave the Global South sustained agenda-setting power.

India's 2023 presidency as the foundation

Johannesburg deepened the template India set in New Delhi.

  • India’s New Delhi Summit (2023) made the African Union a permanent G20 member — its biggest structural change since the EU joined.
  • India branded its term ‘Voice of the Global South’, convening developing countries outside the formal summit.
  • New Delhi delivered a consensus declaration at a time many doubted one was possible, on language covering Ukraine and development.
  • It championed Digital Public Infrastructure, MDB reform and the LiFE (sustainable lifestyles) idea — themes Johannesburg carried forward.

The Johannesburg Declaration — Global South priorities

The 122-paragraph text reads as a developing-country charter.

  • Climate finance: recognised a need for USD 5.8-5.9 trillion for developing countries pre-2030 and a ‘billions-to-trillions’ scale-up.
  • Debt: noted interest payments on low-income countries’ external debt have more than doubled in a decade; reaffirmed the G20 Common Framework and debt transparency.
  • Critical minerals: adopted a voluntary G20 Critical Minerals Framework stressing local beneficiation and producer-country sovereignty.
  • Energy and food: flagged that over 600 million Africans lack electricity and up to 720 million people faced hunger in 2024; backed Mission 300 and a Food Security Task Force.

Multilateral and UNSC reform

A recurring demand: institutions built in 1945 must reflect 2025.

  • Backed reform of the UN Security Council to expand representation for Africa, Asia-Pacific and Latin America.
  • Pushed the Capital Adequacy Framework reforms so Multilateral Development Banks can lend more.
  • Welcomed the 16th IMF quota increase and a new IMF Executive Board chair for Sub-Saharan Africa.
  • Noted Special Drawing Rights (SDR) channelling exceeding USD 100 billion to support vulnerable economies.

Significance for India

Johannesburg validated the agenda India seeded.

  • The AU’s permanent seat — India’s 2023 achievement — was treated as settled and operational.
  • India’s signature themes (DPI, MDB reform, climate equity) resurfaced as standing G20 business.
  • It reinforced India’s claim to Global South leadership and its case for permanent UNSC membership.
  • Continuity of the developing-country bloc gives India a durable coalition on debt, climate finance and reform.

Challenges and limits

Ambition outran enforceability.

  • Declarations are non-binding; the climate-finance and debt commitments lack hard delivery timelines.
  • Divergence among major powers on trade and tariffs strained consensus-building.
  • Most new tools — the Critical Minerals Framework, debt-for-climate swaps — are voluntary.
  • Gaps between rich and poor members persist on who pays for the energy transition and adaptation.

Way Forward

Turn pledges into delivery

  • Convert the climate-finance recognition into measurable, time-bound flows to developing countries.
  • Operationalise the Common Framework so debt restructuring for low-income countries is faster and fairer.

Institutionalise Global South gains

  • Use the troika to lock the AU’s seat and developing-country priorities into every future agenda.
  • Keep momentum on MDB and IMF quota reform so voice matches economic weight.

India should leverage the unbroken developing-country presidency arc to build a standing coalition on debt relief, critical minerals and climate equity, while pressing its long-standing case for UN Security Council reform.

Conclusion

The Johannesburg Summit mattered less for any single deliverable than for what it confirmed: a G20 increasingly shaped by the Global South. The first African-hosted summit took the agenda India seeded in New Delhi — the African Union’s seat, MDB reform, climate equity — and made it the forum’s everyday business.

The hard test is delivery. With non-binding declarations and voluntary frameworks, the value of Johannesburg will be judged by whether climate finance scales, debt eases and institutions actually reform. For India, the summit is both an endorsement of past leadership and an opening to anchor a durable developing-country coalition.

UPSC Practice Questions

Prelims MCQ 1

With reference to the G20, consider the following statements:

  1. It has a permanent secretariat headquartered in Geneva.
  2. The African Union became a permanent G20 member at the 2023 New Delhi Summit.
  3. Continuity across presidencies is maintained through a ‘troika’ of the past, present and incoming chairs.

How many of the above statements are correct?

(a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All three (d) None

Answer: (b) Only two

Explanation:

The G20 has NO permanent secretariat (statement 1 wrong). The AU joined permanently at New Delhi 2023 (2 correct) and the troika provides continuity (3 correct).

Prelims MCQ 2

The 2025 G20 Leaders’ Summit was hosted by which country, under what theme?

(a) Brazil — ‘Building a Just World and a Sustainable Planet’ (b) South Africa — ‘Solidarity, Equality, Sustainability’ (c) Indonesia — ‘Recover Together, Recover Stronger’ (d) India — ‘One Earth, One Family, One Future’

Answer: (b) South Africa — 'Solidarity, Equality, Sustainability'

Explanation:

Johannesburg, South Africa hosted the first African G20 summit on Nov 22-23, 2025, under ‘Solidarity, Equality, Sustainability’, rooted in the Ubuntu philosophy.

UPSC Mains Questions

  1. The G20 has increasingly become a platform for Global South aspirations. Examine how India’s 2023 presidency and the 2025 Johannesburg Summit advanced this shift, and assess the limits of a forum that produces only non-binding declarations.
  2. Reform of the UN Security Council and the multilateral financial architecture is a recurring G20 demand. Discuss the case for such reform and the obstacles to achieving it, with reference to recent G20 commitments.

Sources: Drishti IAS and G20 Information Centre, University of Toronto.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where and when was the 2025 G20 summit held?

The G20 Leaders’ Summit was held in Johannesburg, South Africa, on 22-23 November 2025. It was the first G20 summit ever hosted on the African continent, under the theme ‘Solidarity, Equality, Sustainability’, drawn from the African philosophy of Ubuntu.

What is the G20 troika?

Because the G20 has no permanent secretariat, the troika ensures continuity. It is a group of three members: the immediately past presidency, the current presidency, and the incoming presidency. They coordinate so each year’s agenda builds on the previous one rather than starting afresh.

When did the African Union join the G20?

The African Union became a permanent member of the G20 at the New Delhi Summit in September 2023, during India’s presidency. It was the first expansion of the grouping’s membership since the European Union, giving Africa a collective seat at the table.

What were the key outcomes of the Johannesburg Declaration?

The 122-paragraph declaration pushed scaling up climate finance, easing low-income-country debt, a voluntary Critical Minerals Framework, energy access initiatives like Mission 300, food security action, and reform of the UN Security Council and multilateral financial institutions to reflect today’s geopolitics.

How does the summit reflect India’s role?

Johannesburg built on the template India set in 2023, when it secured the AU’s permanent seat and branded itself the ‘Voice of the Global South’. India’s themes of MDB reform, climate equity and digital public infrastructure carried into 2025, reinforcing its Global South leadership and reform agenda.

Are G20 declarations legally binding?

No. The G20 is an informal forum and its Leaders’ Declarations are political commitments, not enforceable law. Many of its new tools, such as the Critical Minerals Framework and debt-for-climate swaps, are explicitly voluntary, so delivery depends on members’ political will.

Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025 Operationalised

Open article →Download PDF

Why in News?

The Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025, notified by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) on 14 November 2025 under Section 40 of the DPDP Act, 2023, moved into phased implementation through December 2025. The subordinate Rules supply the operational machinery the Act had left blank for nearly two years, giving India its first working data-protection regime.

The Rules detail consent notices, register Consent Managers, set security and breach-notification duties, and stand up the Data Protection Board of India — with compliance staggered over up to 18 months so firms can ready their systems.

  • Notified 14 November 2025 under Section 40 of the DPDP Act, 2023; provisions for the Data Protection Board commenced 13 November 2025.
  • Rules 1, 2 and 17-21 took effect immediately on publication; the bulk (Rules 3, 5-16, 22-23) apply 18 months later.
  • Consent Manager registration (Rule 4) is reserved for a later notification, with a minimum net worth of Rs 2 crore.
  • Operationalises the DPDP Act, 2023 — India’s first comprehensive data-protection statute — which received assent on 11 August 2023.
  • Anchors the right to privacy recognised in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) in an enforceable digital framework.

The development matters in the context of:

  • India processes one of the world’s largest volumes of digital personal data yet had no horizontal privacy law until the DPDP Act, 2023.
  • The Rules close the gap between a passed-but-dormant statute and on-ground enforcement, signalling India’s shift from a rights declaration to a compliance regime.
Illustration of a person managing data-sharing consent toggles with a shield and lock symbolising privacy protection.
A consent-and-protection scene evoking India's new digital personal data protection framework. Illustration: AI-generated (Freepik)
Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025 Operationalised — quick facts

UPSC Relevance

Prelims Relevance

  • DPDP Rules, 2025 — notified 14 November 2025 by MeitY under Section 40 of the DPDP Act, 2023.
  • DPDP Act, 2023 — assent 11 August 2023; India’s first comprehensive data-protection law.
  • Data Principal — the individual to whom the personal data relates.
  • Data Fiduciary — the entity that determines the purpose and means of processing.
  • Significant Data Fiduciary (SDF) — high-volume/high-risk fiduciary with extra duties (DPIA, audit).
  • Consent Manager — India-incorporated entity (net worth Rs 2 crore) enabling consent give/manage/withdraw.
  • Data Protection Board of India — adjudicatory body; appeals lie to the Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT).
  • Maximum penalty Rs 250 crore for failure to take reasonable security safeguards; Rs 200 crore for breach-notification failure.
  • Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) — declared the right to privacy a fundamental right under Article 21.
  • B.N. Srikrishna Committee (2018) — drafted the original data-protection bill.

Mains Relevance

GS Paper 2

  • Governance: how subordinate rule-making operationalises a framework statute and balances individual rights with ease of doing business.
  • Statutory bodies: the design, independence and adjudicatory role of the Data Protection Board of India.

GS Paper 3

  • Internal security and IT: data breaches, cyber-security safeguards, and obligations on Significant Data Fiduciaries.
  • Economy: compliance burden on the digital economy, start-ups and Consent Manager market design.

Essay

  • Privacy in the age of data — balancing individual dignity against state and market surveillance.
  • From rights on paper to rights in practice: the long road from Puttaswamy to enforceable law.

Background and Context

From Puttaswamy to a statute

The Rules are the final step in an eight-year arc that began with a constitutional ruling.

  • Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) held that the right to privacy is intrinsic to the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21.
  • The judgment directed the State to craft a data-protection regime, prompting the B.N. Srikrishna Committee (2018) to draft the first bill.
  • After several redrafts, the DPDP Act, 2023 received assent on 11 August 2023 but lay largely dormant pending these implementing Rules.
  • The DPDP Rules, 2025, notified on 14 November 2025, supply the operational detail and finally switch on the regime.
Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025 Operationalised — exam lens

Consent-based processing and notices

The architecture rests on free, informed, specific and revocable consent.

  • Under Rule 3, a Data Fiduciary must give the Data Principal a consent notice that is clear, accessible and in simple language, presented separately from other information.
  • The notice must itemise the personal data collected, the purpose, contact details, and the mechanism to withdraw consent or exercise rights.
  • Consent must be as easy to withdraw as it was to give, reflecting the Act’s intent that processing follows purpose.
  • Rule 5 lets the State process data for subsidies, benefits, licences and public services per the Second Schedule, including statutory schemes.

Consent Managers — a new institution

The Rules create a regulated intermediary to make consent portable and auditable.

  • A Consent Manager (Rule 4) is a single point through which a Data Principal can give, review, manage and withdraw consent across Data Fiduciaries.
  • Eligibility requires incorporation in India and a minimum net worth of Rs 2 crore (First Schedule), filtering out under-capitalised entities.
  • Consent Managers must run interoperable platforms, maintain high security, and keep records of consents and data sharing.
  • Registration takes effect on a later notification, signalling a phased build-out of this market.

Data Fiduciary obligations

Every entity that decides why and how data is processed carries baseline duties.

  • Rule 6 mandates reasonable security safeguards — encryption, tokenisation, access controls, logging, and backup/recovery.
  • Rule 7 requires breach notification to affected individuals without delay and to the Data Protection Board within a tight window, with details and mitigation steps.
  • Rule 8 sets retention and deletion norms — data is erased once its purpose ends, with at least 48 hours’ notice before deletion and logs kept for a minimum period.
  • Rule 9 requires a Data Fiduciary to publish a Data Protection Officer contact and honour access, correction and erasure requests.

Stricter duties for Significant Data Fiduciaries

Large or high-risk processors face a heavier accountability tier.

  • Rule 13 requires a Significant Data Fiduciary to conduct an annual Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) and independent audit.
  • An SDF must verify that its algorithms do not pose a risk to Data Principals’ rights.
  • Transfers of specified personal data outside India may be restricted unless the Central Government authorises them.
  • Classification as an SDF turns on data volume, sensitivity, and risk to sovereignty, electoral democracy and public order.

Children and persons with disabilities

The Rules build specific safeguards for those who cannot consent for themselves.

  • Rule 10 requires verifiable parental consent before processing a child’s data, using reliable age-verification — including digital lockers or authorised government platforms.
  • Behavioural tracking and targeted advertising directed at children is barred under the Act.
  • Rule 11 requires the verifiable consent of a lawful guardian for persons with disabilities under guardianship.
  • Rule 12 carves limited exemptions for specified fiduciaries and purposes listed in the Fourth Schedule.

The Data Protection Board and penalties

Enforcement runs through a digital-first adjudicator backed by heavy fines.

  • The Data Protection Board of India (Rules 17-23) functions as a digital office that can hold electronic hearings and call for information from fiduciaries.
  • Appeals against Board orders lie to the Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT).
  • The Act’s Schedule sets a maximum penalty of Rs 250 crore for failure to take reasonable security safeguards.
  • Failure to notify a breach attracts up to Rs 200 crore; the exact quantum is set by the Board after weighing gravity, duration and due diligence.

Way Forward

Operational readiness

  • Firms should map data flows, appoint Data Protection Officers, and rebuild consent journeys well before the 18-month window closes.
  • MeitY should publish the Second and Fourth Schedules’ fine print and notify Consent Manager registration promptly to give the ecosystem certainty.

Capacity and trust

  • The Data Protection Board needs independent staffing, technical expertise and transparent procedure to command public confidence.
  • Clear cross-border transfer rules and an SDF list will reduce ambiguity for the digital economy and start-ups.

Sustained awareness so Data Principals understand their rights to access, correct, erase and grieve will decide whether the law translates into real privacy on the ground.

Conclusion

The DPDP Rules, 2025, turn a long-passed statute into a live regime, completing the journey the Puttaswamy ruling set in motion. By codifying consent, security, breach-notification and accountability, they shift India from declaring a right to enforcing it.

The phased 18-month rollout buys industry time, but the test now is institutional — whether the Data Protection Board acts with independence and whether consent genuinely empowers the citizen rather than becoming a click-through ritual.

UPSC Practice Questions

Prelims MCQ 1

With reference to the Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025, consider the following statements:

  1. They were notified under the Information Technology Act, 2000.
  2. They provide for the registration of Consent Managers incorporated in India.
  3. All provisions came into force immediately on the date of publication.

How many of the above statements are correct?

(a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All three (d) None

Answer: (a) Only one

Explanation:

Only statement 2 is correct. The Rules were notified under Section 40 of the DPDP Act, 2023 (not the IT Act, 2000), so statement 1 is wrong. Implementation is phased over up to 18 months, so statement 3 is wrong.

Prelims MCQ 2

The right to privacy was declared a fundamental right intrinsic to Article 21 in which case?

(a) Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) (b) Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) (c) Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) (d) Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015)

Answer: (b) Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017)

Explanation:

The nine-judge Bench in Puttaswamy (2017) held that the right to privacy is a fundamental right protected under Article 21, the foundation the DPDP Act and Rules now operationalise.

UPSC Mains Questions

  1. The Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025, mark India’s shift from declaring the right to privacy to enforcing it. Examine the key obligations the Rules impose on Data Fiduciaries and the institutional role of the Data Protection Board of India.
  2. Subordinate legislation often decides the fate of a framework statute. In light of the DPDP Rules, 2025, discuss how phased rule-making balances the protection of personal data against the compliance burden on the digital economy.

Sources: Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) and SCC Online.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the DPDP Rules, 2025?

They are the subordinate rules notified by MeitY on 14 November 2025 under Section 40 of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023. They supply the operational detail the Act left blank — consent notices, Consent Manager registration, security and breach-notification duties, retention norms and the Data Protection Board — finally making India’s data-protection regime workable.

When do the Rules take effect?

Implementation is phased. Rules 1, 2 and 17-21 took effect immediately on publication; most substantive obligations (Rules 3, 5-16, 22-23) apply about 18 months later. Consent Manager registration under Rule 4 is reserved for a separate, later notification, giving firms time to build compliant systems.

Who is a Data Fiduciary and a Data Principal?

A Data Principal is the individual to whom the personal data relates. A Data Fiduciary is the entity that decides the purpose and means of processing that data. The Rules place obligations on fiduciaries and rights — access, correction, erasure and grievance redressal — with the principals.

What is a Consent Manager?

A Consent Manager is a regulated, India-incorporated intermediary through which a person can give, review, manage and withdraw consent across multiple Data Fiduciaries from one place. Eligibility requires a minimum net worth of Rs 2 crore and the ability to run secure, interoperable consent platforms.

What penalties can the Data Protection Board impose?

The Act’s Schedule sets a maximum penalty of Rs 250 crore for failure to take reasonable security safeguards and up to Rs 200 crore for failing to notify a breach. The Data Protection Board of India adjudicates and fixes the exact quantum based on the gravity, duration and due diligence shown.

How are children’s data protected?

Under Rule 10, a Data Fiduciary must obtain verifiable parental or guardian consent before processing a child’s personal data, using reliable age-verification methods. Behavioural tracking and targeted advertising aimed at children are barred, and similar safeguards apply to persons with disabilities under guardianship.