GS Paper 4 20 marks · 150w 20 min Medium
(a) “Corruption is the manifestation of the failure of core values in the society.” In your opinion, what measures can be adopted to uplift the core values in the society? (b) In the context of work environment, differentiate between ‘coercion’ and ‘undue influence’ with suitable examples.
Subtopic: Ethics Theory · values, corruption and workplace ethics
How to structure your answer
Introduction → (a) measures to uplift core values against corruption → (b) distinguish coercion and undue influence with examples → Conclusion
Written within the word limit
154 words · target 150 words · 20 min
(a) Upholding core values to fight corruption
Corruption reflects a collapse of core values — honesty, integrity, empathy and public spirit. Measures to strengthen them include:
- Value education and character-building from school (NEP 2020) and within the family.
- Ethical leadership that sets a personal example — the 'tone at the top'.
- Transparency and accountability systems — RTI, e-governance and social audit — that reduce opportunity.
- Recognition of role models and celebration of integrity.
- Swift and certain punishment to deter wrongdoing and re-anchor social norms.
(b) Coercion versus undue influence
Coercion is compelling consent through force, threat or an unlawful act — for example, a supervisor threatening to terminate a subordinate unless she signs a false report. Undue influence is subtler: exploiting a position of power or trust to dominate another's will without overt force — for example, a senior leveraging control over appraisals to make a dependent junior clear a dubious file. Coercion works through fear; undue influence works through relationship and dependence.
What an examiner expects to see
- Corruption signals the failure of core societal values
- Value education, from family and school onward, rebuilds character
- Ethical leadership and 'tone at the top' set the moral climate
- Transparency tools — RTI, e-governance, social audit — shrink opportunity for corruption
- Certain and swift punishment re-anchors social norms
- Coercion uses force/threat; undue influence exploits power, trust and dependence
Concrete cases, schemes and judgments
- NEP 2020 emphasis on ethics and value education
- RTI Act, 2005 and social audit (MGNREGA) as accountability tools
- Section 15 (coercion) and Section 16 (undue influence), Indian Contract Act, 1872
- 'Tone at the top' as a governance principle in ethical leadership
Terminology to weave into the answer
core valuesethical leadershipcoercionundue influenceaccountability