GS Paper 4 20 marks · 150w 20 min Medium
(a) In the present digital age, social media has revolutionised our way of communication and interaction. However, it has raised several ethical issues and challenges. Describe the key ethical dilemmas in this regard. (b) “Constitutional morality is not a natural sentiment but a product of civil education and adherance of the rule of law.” Examine the significance of constitutional morality for public servant highlighting the role in promoting good governance and ensuring accountability in public administration.
Subtopic: Ethics Theory · digital ethics and constitutional morality
How to structure your answer
Introduction → (a) describe key ethical dilemmas of social media → illustrate → (b) define constitutional morality → its significance for public servants → link to good governance and accountability → Conclusion
Detailed model answer
198 words · target 150 words · 20 min
Two forces increasingly shape public life: the digital public square and the constitutional value framework that must govern it.
(a) Ethical dilemmas of social media
- Privacy vs openness: constant data harvesting against the right to privacy (Puttaswamy).
- Free speech vs harm: misinformation, hate speech and deepfakes versus expression under Article 19.
- Anonymity vs accountability: trolling and defamation shielded by pseudonymity.
- Attention economy vs well-being: addictive design, echo chambers and effects on mental health, especially of the young.
(b) Constitutional morality
Constitutional morality, a term Dr. Ambedkar borrowed from Grote, is the disciplined commitment to constitutional values and the rule of law, not merely to the letter of the text. As the question notes, it is cultivated through civic education, not instinctive.
- For a public servant it means fidelity to the Constitution's spirit—equality, dignity, secularism—over personal or majoritarian preference.
- It anchors good governance: impartiality, non-arbitrariness and protection of minority rights.
- It underpins accountability: acting within the law, giving reasons, and being answerable, as courts affirmed in Navtej Johar and the NCT of Delhi case.
Conclusion
A public servant guided by constitutional morality can wield digital tools ethically, turning the online sphere into an instrument of, not a threat to, democratic governance.
What an examiner expects to see
- Social-media dilemmas: privacy vs data harvesting; free speech vs misinformation/hate/deepfakes
- Anonymity enabling trolling and defamation; attention economy harming mental health
- Constitutional morality: Ambedkar's borrowing from George Grote; loyalty to constitutional spirit
- It is a product of civic education, not natural sentiment
- For public servants it demands impartiality, dignity, secularism over personal/majoritarian bias
- It promotes good governance (non-arbitrariness) and accountability (reasoned, lawful action)
- Judicially invoked in Navtej Johar and Government of NCT of Delhi v Union of India
Concrete cases, schemes and judgments
- K.S. Puttaswamy v Union of India (2017) on privacy
- Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India (2018) invoking constitutional morality
- Government of NCT of Delhi v Union of India (2018) on constitutional morality and governance
- IT Rules 2021 and deepfake/misinformation debates
Terminology to weave into the answer
constitutional moralitydigital ethicsmisinformation and deepfakesright to privacyaccountability