(a) “Social values are more important than economic values.” Discuss the above statement with examples in the context of inclusive growth of a nation. (b) Some recent developments such as introduction of RTI Act, media and judicial activism, etc., are proving helpful in bringing about greater transparency and accountability in the functioning of the government. However, it is also being observed that at times the mechanisms are misused. Another negative effect is that the officers are now afraid to take prompt decisions. Analyze this situation in detail and suggest how this dichotomy can be resolved. Suggest how these negative impacts can be minimized.

(a) Social values versus economic values

Economic values measure material efficiency and growth; social values embody equity, dignity, trust and justice. In inclusive growth, social values must guide economic ones, for growth that ignores the marginalised is neither stable nor legitimate.

• Kerala's investment in health and literacy produced human development ahead of its per-capita income, proving social investment yields inclusive outcomes.
• Jobless, inequitable GDP growth breeds unrest; MGNREGA and public-distribution safety nets protect dignity where markets fail.

Yet economic values are not opposed to social ones; sustained welfare needs a productive economy. Social values should set the ends, economic values provide the means.

(b) Transparency mechanisms: benefits and misuse

The RTI Act 2005, an active media and judicial activism have exposed scams, empowered citizens and deterred arbitrariness. However, frivolous or blackmail RTIs, media trials that pre-judge, and judicial overreach can harass honest officials.

The most damaging effect is decision paralysis: officers avoid bold decisions fearing later scrutiny, delaying projects and clearances.

Resolving the dichotomy

• Distinguish honest error from mala fide intent; protect bona fide decisions (as Section 13 of the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act 2018 attempts).
• Record reasons for decisions, enforce citizen's charters and time-bound clearances, and strengthen internal grievance redress against misuse.
• Build an ethical climate so accountability is felt as duty, not threat.

Conclusion

Transparency and prompt, courageous decision-making are complementary, not contradictory, when honest intent is shielded.