Analyze the influence of Persian traditions on the development of architecture and painting under the Mughals. To what extent did these art forms reflect a synthesis of Indian and Persian …
Subtopic: Paper I · Persian influence and synthesis in Mughal architecture and painting
How to structure your answer
Take architecture and painting separately, listing the Persian element and the Indian element in each, then judge how far synthesis went.
Detailed model answer
283 words · target 200 words · 12 min
Architecture — the Persian contribution. The charbagh, the fourfold garden divided by water channels representing paradise, arrived with Humayun's tomb, completed around 1571, which also introduced the double dome and the monumental pishtaq portal with recessed iwan. Persian and Central Asian practice supplied the bulbous dome profile, glazed tilework, arabesque and calligraphic inscription bands, and the principle of bilateral symmetry on a raised plinth.
The Indian contribution. The chhatri, the chhajja eave, the jharokha balcony, pierced jaali screens, the bracket and beam trabeate system, red sandstone as a material, and lotus and kalash motifs. Fatehpur Sikri is the clearest case: its palaces are essentially trabeate Indian buildings in Islamic dress, and the Panch Mahal has no Persian precedent at all.
Painting. The atelier was Persian in origin — Mir Sayyid Ali and Abd-us-Samad were brought from Safavid Iran by Humayun — and supplied composition, the album format, calligraphy, jewel-like mineral colour and fine stippling. Indian artists such as Daswanth, Basawan and Kesu Das brought naturalism, volume, portrait likeness, local flora and fauna, and a preference for narrative action. The Razmnama, the Persian translation of the Mahabharata illustrated for Akbar, is synthesis made explicit as policy.
How far did synthesis go? Very far, and deliberately so. The Taj Mahal is a Persian tomb-garden plan executed by Indian craftsmen in Indian materials with Indian inlay technique. Ebba Koch has shown that this blending was an imperial programme, not an accident of proximity — the visual counterpart of sulh-i-kul.
The qualification. Synthesis was strongest under Akbar and Jahangir and narrowed later; Aurangzeb's Badshahi and Moti Masjid work returns to a more austere Islamic idiom. And synthesis was an elite court phenomenon — provincial and vernacular building traditions continued largely undisturbed beneath it.
What an examiner expects to see
- Architecture — the Persian contribution.