GS Paper 2 10 marks · 200w 14 min Medium
Discuss the political developments in Maldives in the last two years. Should they be of any cause of concern to India?
Subtopic: International Relations · India–Maldives relations
How to structure your answer
Introduction → Nasheed's ouster (Feb 2012) and the Waheed government → GMR airport contract termination and Nasheed's refuge in the Indian High Commission → the annulled 2013 election and Yameen's win → India's stakes: sea lanes, China's inroads, investments, expatriates → Conclusion
Written within the word limit
215 words · target 200 words · 14 min
Between 2011 and 2013 the Maldives passed through its most turbulent phase since its democratic transition of 2008 — turbulence that mattered directly to India, given the archipelago's position astride Indian Ocean sea lanes.
Key Political Developments
- In February 2012, President Mohamed Nasheed resigned after weeks of protests and a police mutiny — he called it a coup — and Vice-President Mohammed Waheed took over.
- Nasheed then faced prosecution over the detention of a judge and, in February 2013, took refuge in the Indian High Commission in Male for eleven days.
- In December 2012, the Waheed government abruptly terminated GMR's roughly USD 500 million Male airport contract, then India's largest investment in the country.
- The Supreme Court annulled the first round of the September 2013 presidential election; after repeated delays, Abdulla Yameen defeated Nasheed in the November run-off.
Why This Concerns India
- Instability creates openings for China and for radical networks in a state close to the crucial sea lanes of communication and India's island territories.
- The GMR episode damaged investor confidence and signalled an anti-India drift in Male.
- Democratic backsliding weakened SAARC and India's credibility as the neighbourhood's first responder — a role it played in Operation Cactus (1988).
The 2012–13 turbulence previewed the India–China contest that later produced the 'India Out' campaign; patient engagement, capacity-building and respect for Maldivian democratic institutions under Neighbourhood First remain India's best response.
What an examiner expects to see
- Nasheed's February 2012 resignation amid a police mutiny and Waheed's takeover marked the collapse of the Maldives' first democratically elected presidency.
- Termination of GMR's Male airport contract (December 2012) hit India's largest investment in the Maldives and signalled an anti-India tilt.
- Nasheed's eleven-day refuge in the Indian High Commission (February 2013) drew India directly into the domestic crisis.
- Supreme Court annulment of the September 2013 poll and Yameen's eventual win exposed the fragility of Maldivian institutions.
- India's stakes: security of Indian Ocean sea lanes, China's growing inroads, risk of radicalisation, investor confidence and the Indian expatriate community.
- Instability undermined SAARC cohesion and India's role as first responder in the neighbourhood.
Concrete cases, schemes and judgments
- GMR Male airport contract (~USD 500 million) terminated in December 2012; GMR later won arbitral compensation.
- Nasheed's refuge in the Indian High Commission, February 2013.
- Operation Cactus (1988) — India's intervention to foil a coup, the precedent of India as first responder.
- The later 'India Out' campaign (2023) confirming the strategic stakes visible in 2013.
Terminology to weave into the answer
sea lanes of communicationNeighbourhood Firstdemocratic backslidingGMR arbitrationfirst responderIndia–China contest in IOR