Discuss the recent measures initiated in disaster management by the Government of India, departing from the earlier reactive approach.
Subtopic: Disaster Management · Proactive reforms & institutional architecture
How to structure your answer
Introduction: Contrast the old relief-centric reactive model with the post-2005 proactive, risk-reduction approach.
Body: (1) Legal-institutional reform; (2) Planning and global alignment; (3) Technology, finance and infrastructure resilience.
Conclusion: Acknowledge progress while flagging local-level implementation gaps.
Written within the word limit
219 words · target 250 words · 11 min
Introduction: India once treated disasters as one-off events met with post-event relief and compensation. The approach has since turned proactive — anticipating, preventing and reducing risk before disaster strikes — in line with the global shift toward Disaster Risk Reduction.
Legal and institutional reform: The Disaster Management Act, 2005 created a three-tier structure — NDMA at the centre, SDMAs in states and DDMAs in districts — and raised the National Disaster Response Force (NDRF) as a standing specialised multi-hazard force, ending reliance on ad-hoc deployment. The National Institute of Disaster Management (NIDM) anchors training and research.
Planning and global alignment:
- The National Disaster Management Plan, 2016 (revised 2019) was among the first worldwide aligned with the Sendai Framework's four priorities.
- India launched the Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure (CDRI) in 2019 to mainstream resilience into roads, power, telecom and transport.
Technology, finance and forecasting: Early-warning systems — ITEWC for tsunamis at INCOIS, IMD cyclone forecasting, and flood and landslide alerts — now give vital lead time; the National Cyclone Risk Mitigation Project, dedicated SDRF/NDRF funds and Finance Commission mitigation grants back prevention with money. Mass pre-cyclone evacuations have cut deaths sharply, as in Phailin (2013) and Fani (2019).
Conclusion: The architecture has clearly moved from relief to resilience; the next step is strengthening district and community-level preparedness and risk-informed land use so this proactive intent reaches the last vulnerable household.
What an examiner expects to see
- Old approach was relief-centric and reactive; new approach is proactive risk reduction
- Disaster Management Act, 2005 created NDMA, SDMAs and DDMAs — a three-tier institutional structure
- National Disaster Response Force (NDRF) raised as a standing specialised multi-hazard force
- National Disaster Management Plan 2016 (revised 2019), aligned with the Sendai Framework
- Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure (CDRI) launched by India in 2019
- Early-warning systems: ITEWC for tsunamis, IMD cyclone forecasting, flood and landslide alerts
- National Cyclone Risk Mitigation Project reduced cyclone deaths sharply (e.g., Phailin 2013, Fani 2019)
- Risk financing via SDRF/NDRF and Finance Commission mitigation funds; PM's 10-point DRR agenda
- National Institute of Disaster Management (NIDM) for training, research and capacity building
Concrete cases, schemes and judgments
- Disaster Management Act, 2005 (NDMA/SDMA/DDMA)
- National Disaster Management Plan 2016 (revised 2019)
- Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure (CDRI), 2019
- Cyclone Phailin 2013 / Fani 2019 — mass evacuation under NCRMP cut deaths drastically
- Indian Tsunami Early Warning Centre (ITEWC), INCOIS Hyderabad