Opens in a new tab
Join Anantam IAS Channel on Telegram
GS Paper 2 10 marks · 150w 9 min Easy

Discuss the role of Public Accounts Committee in establishing accountability of the government to the people.

Subtopic: Constitution & Polity · parliamentary committees and financial accountability

Model answer outline

How to structure your answer

Introduction (PAC as Parliament's audit arm) → composition and the opposition-chair convention → how it enforces accountability through CAG reports and Action Taken Notes → landmark scrutinies → limitations of its ex post facto, advisory role → Conclusion: strengthening measures
Full model answer

Detailed model answer

198 words · target 150 words · 9 min

Introduction

The Public Accounts Committee (PAC), Parliament's oldest financial committee (1921), scrutinises how the executive spends money voted by Parliament, operationalising the accountability embedded in Articles 112-114 and 151.

Composition

It has 22 members — 15 from the Lok Sabha, 7 from the Rajya Sabha — elected annually by proportional representation through the single transferable vote; ministers cannot be members, and by convention since 1967 the chairperson comes from the Opposition, insulating scrutiny from the ruling party.

Role in Establishing Accountability

  • Examines the CAG's audit reports laid before Parliament under Article 151, verifying that money was legally available and applied to the purpose sanctioned.
  • Exposes irregularities, waste and implementation failure — its scrutiny of the 2G spectrum allocation and the 2010 Commonwealth Games shaped public accountability debates.
  • Summons secretaries for explanations; ministries must file Action Taken Notes, closing the audit loop on behalf of the people.
  • Provides continuous, granular oversight that the full House cannot perform, with proceedings that inform citizens through the press.

Limitations

Its scrutiny is post-mortem, recommendations are advisory, it cannot question policy as such, and only a fraction of audit paragraphs receive detailed examination.

Conclusion

Despite advisory status, the PAC-CAG partnership remains Parliament's sharpest instrument of financial accountability; time-bound Action Taken Notes and stronger technical staff would sharpen it further.

Key points

What an examiner expects to see

  • Oldest financial committee (1921); 22 members — 15 Lok Sabha, 7 Rajya Sabha — elected annually by proportional representation through single transferable vote; ministers barred
  • Opposition chairperson by convention since 1967 gives bipartisan credibility to scrutiny
  • Examines CAG audit reports laid under Article 151 — appropriation and finance accounts — testing legality and propriety of expenditure
  • Summons secretaries and enforces Action Taken Notes, closing the accountability loop between audit and corrective action
  • Landmark scrutinies (2G spectrum, Commonwealth Games 2010) show its agenda-setting power
  • Limits: ex post facto review, advisory recommendations, no policy questions, only a fraction of audit paras examined
  • Reforms: time-bound ATNs, technical support staff, subject-wise sub-committees
Examples to use

Concrete cases, schemes and judgments

  • PAC examination of the 2G spectrum allocation audit (2010-11)
  • Follow-up on CAG findings on the 2010 Commonwealth Games
  • Article 151: CAG reports laid before Parliament as the PAC's raw material
  • Convention of an Opposition MP chairing the PAC since 1967
Keywords / terms

Terminology to weave into the answer

Public Accounts CommitteeComptroller and Auditor GeneralArticle 151Action Taken Notesfinancial accountabilityex post facto scrutiny

Share this answer