GS Paper 1 10 marks · 150w 9 min Medium
Do you think marriage as a sacrament is loosing its value in Modern India?
Subtopic: Indian Society · marriage and social change
How to structure your answer
Introduction (marriage as an indissoluble samskara in Hindu tradition) → Contractual shift: HMA 1955, divorce, live-in recognition → Choice-based, inter-caste and delayed marriages → Continuities: near-universality, arranged marriage, ritual persistence → Conclusion (transformation of character, not loss of value)
Detailed model answer
193 words · target 150 words · 9 min
Classical Hindu tradition treats marriage as a sacrament (samskara) — an indissoluble, sacred union entered for dharma, progeny and companionship, not a dissolvable contract. Modern India shows visible strains on this ideal, but not its collapse.
Signs of the sacrament weakening
- Legal contractualisation: the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 introduced divorce and judicial separation, while the Special Marriage Act, 1954 enables purely civil unions.
- Rising divorce and separation, particularly in urban India, with matrimonial disputes a fast-growing category of litigation.
- Live-in relationships enjoy judicial recognition, with partners protected under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (Indra Sarma case, 2013).
- Individual choice: self-arranged, inter-caste and late marriages reflect a companionship-based rather than ritual-based understanding.
- Growing singlehood and delayed marriage among educated women prioritising careers.
Continuity of the sacramental ideal
- Marriage remains nearly universal in India, and arranged marriage is still the dominant mode.
- Elaborate rituals — saptapadi, kanyadan — persist even in otherwise 'modern' weddings.
- India's divorce rate, around 1%, stays among the world's lowest; family and kin continue to anchor matrimonial decisions.
Marriage in India is thus not so much losing value as changing character: the sacramental frame increasingly coexists with contractual, egalitarian and companionate elements — a transformation of the institution rather than its decline.
What an examiner expects to see
- Open with the sacramental ideal — indissoluble samskara for dharma, progeny and companionship — then test it against evidence, since 'Do you think' demands a reasoned opinion.
- Legal change is the strongest evidence: divorce under HMA 1955, civil marriage under SMA 1954, live-in protection under the DV Act 2005.
- Behavioural change: rising urban divorce, live-in relationships, self-choice and inter-caste marriages, later marriage among educated women.
- Counter-evidence: marriage remains near-universal, arranged marriage dominant, rituals thriving, divorce around 1% — among the world's lowest.
- Sociological framing: shift from marriage as institution to marriage as companionate relationship — transformation, not decline.
- A balanced, evidence-backed personal verdict in the conclusion is essential.
Concrete cases, schemes and judgments
- Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 introduced divorce into a traditionally indissoluble institution
- Indra Sarma v. V.K.V. Sarma (2013): live-in partners protected under the Domestic Violence Act
- Lata Singh v. State of UP (2006): Supreme Court upheld the right to inter-caste choice marriage
- NFHS-5 data showing rising age at marriage alongside near-universality of marriage
Terminology to weave into the answer
samskaracontractualisationcompanionate marriagelive-in relationshipsinstitution to relationshipsocial change