UPSC CSE 2026 Essay Paper Discussion
GS Paper 1 15 marks · 250w 14 min Medium

How can the mountain ecosystem be restored from the negative impact of development initiatives and tourism?

Subtopic: Geography · mountain ecosystems and sustainable development

Model answer outline

How to structure your answer

Introduction (fragility of mountain systems; recent disasters as warning) → regulate tourism by carrying capacity → discipline development: EIA, slope zoning, construction limits → ecological restoration: afforestation, spring-sheds, wetlands → waste and green mobility measures → community-centred ecotourism and institutional support → Conclusion: development within ecological limits
Full model answer

Written within the word limit

274 words · target 250 words · 14 min

Mountain ecosystems — steep, seismic, biodiversity-rich and climate-sensitive — are being destabilised by roads, hydropower, unplanned construction and mass tourism, as Kedarnath (2013), the Himachal monsoon disasters (2023) and Joshimath's subsidence (2023) warn.

Restoring the balance

  • Carrying-capacity based tourism: cap daily footfall at fragile sites (NGT limits at Rohtang; regulated darshan on the Char Dham routes), stagger seasons and promote lesser-known circuits to disperse pressure.
  • Discipline development: rigorous EIA and cumulative-impact assessment for hill roads and hydel cascades; slope-stability zoning; no construction on steep slopes, floodplains and drainage channels — heeding warnings like the Mishra Committee (1976) on Joshimath.
  • Ecological restoration: catchment afforestation with native broadleaf species rather than monoculture, spring-shed rejuvenation (NITI Aayog initiative), lake and wetland restoration, and regulated grazing.
  • Waste management: single-use plastic bans (Sikkim pioneered them), carry-back rules for trekkers and decentralised waste facilities in tourist towns.
  • Green mobility and building: ropeways and electric shuttles instead of ever-wider roads; building codes drawing on traditional earthquake-resilient forms like Kath-Kuni architecture.
  • Rationalise hydropower: prefer run-of-river designs with assured environmental flows, and drop projects in paraglacial and eco-sensitive stretches flagged by expert panels such as the Ravi Chopra committee on Uttarakhand.
  • Community-centred ecotourism: homestays in Sikkim and Spiti distribute incomes and create local stakes in conservation; empowered Van Panchayats institutionalise stewardship.
  • Institutional support: the National Mission for Sustaining the Himalayan Ecosystem, payments for ecosystem services to mountain states (the Finance Commission's forest-and-ecology weight in devolution is a start) and GLOF early-warning systems.

Development in the mountains must follow the mountain's own logic — slow, light and local. Restoration succeeds when tourism and infrastructure operate within ecological limits, and mountain communities act as custodians of the ecosystem rather than casualties of its exploitation.

Key points

What an examiner expects to see

  • Diagnose first: mountain fragility (slope instability, seismicity, endemism) makes conventional development models destructive — cite Kedarnath 2013, Joshimath 2023.
  • Tourism reform: carrying-capacity caps, seasonal staggering, dispersal to lesser-known destinations.
  • Regulatory fixes: cumulative EIA for road and hydel cascades, slope-stability zoning, construction bans on floodplains and unstable slopes.
  • Active restoration: native-species catchment afforestation, spring-shed rejuvenation, wetland and pasture management.
  • Waste and mobility: plastic bans, carry-back norms, ropeways and e-shuttles reducing road-cutting pressure.
  • Community-based ecotourism (homestays, Van Panchayats) aligns local incomes with conservation.
  • Institutional scaffolding: NMSHE, payment for ecosystem services / green devolution weight, GLOF early-warning systems.
  • Conclusion: restoration means development within carrying capacity, with communities as custodians.
Examples to use

Concrete cases, schemes and judgments

  • Joshimath land subsidence (2023) — ignored Mishra Committee (1976) warnings against heavy construction.
  • NGT cap on vehicles to Rohtang Pass — carrying-capacity regulation in practice.
  • Sikkim's pioneering single-use plastic ban and organic-state model.
  • NITI Aayog spring-shed rejuvenation initiative for drying Himalayan springs.
  • Kath-Kuni traditional architecture of Himachal — earthquake-resilient, low-impact building.
  • 15th Finance Commission's forest-and-ecology criterion in tax devolution as payment for ecosystem services.
Keywords / terms

Terminology to weave into the answer

carrying capacityeco-sensitive zonespring-shed managementcumulative impact assessmentcommunity-based ecotourismGLOF early warning

Share this answer