UPSC CSE 2026 Essay Paper Discussion
GS Paper 1 15 marks · 250w 14 min Hard

How far is it correct to say that the First World War was fought essentially for the preservation of balance of power?

Subtopic: World History · First World War

Model answer outline

How to structure your answer

Introduction (state the balance-of-power thesis and promise a graded verdict) → Evidence for: British ententes, naval race, Belgian neutrality → Evidence for: French revanchism, Russian balancing in the Balkans → Beyond the thesis: imperialism, nationalism, militarism, Sarajevo → Alliance rigidity converting crisis into general war → Conclusion (war amid the collapse of the balance, not purely for its preservation)
Full model answer

Written within the word limit

275 words · target 250 words · 14 min

The First World War (1914–18) is often read as a war to preserve the European balance of power against a rising Germany. The claim is substantially correct as a framework, but incomplete as a cause.

The balance-of-power case

  • Germany's unification (1871), industrial surge and Weltpolitik threatened the equilibrium constructed at Vienna in 1815.
  • Britain abandoned 'splendid isolation' precisely to balance Germany — the Entente Cordiale (1904) and the Anglo-Russian Convention (1907) answered the Triple Alliance.
  • The Anglo-German Dreadnought naval race was a contest over the maritime balance, and Britain's formal casus belli — Belgian neutrality under the Treaty of London (1839) — expressed its cardinal rule that no single power dominate the Low Countries and the Continent.
  • France sought to check Germany after 1871 and recover Alsace-Lorraine; Russia backed Serbia to preserve the Balkan balance against Austria-Hungary.

Beyond balance of power

  • Imperialism had its own dynamic: rivalries over Morocco (1905, 1911), colonial markets and the Berlin–Baghdad railway.
  • Nationalism: pan-Slavism, pan-Germanism and Balkan aspirations — the Sarajevo assassination of 28 June 1914 was a nationalist act, not a balancing manoeuvre.
  • Militarism and rigid war plans: the Schlieffen Plan and inflexible mobilisation timetables converted a Balkan quarrel into a general war.
  • Domestic pressures and alliance rigidity turned instruments of balance into machinery of escalation.
  • Historians reflect this duality: Fritz Fischer stressed deliberate German ambition for hegemony, while A.J.P. Taylor blamed 'war by timetable' — escalation through planning, not design.

Balance of power was thus the underlying grammar of 1914 — every power justified itself as restoring equilibrium — yet the war erupted because that mechanism broke down under imperialism, nationalism and militarism. It is more accurate to say the war was fought amid the collapse of the balance of power than essentially for its preservation.

Key points

What an examiner expects to see

  • 'How far' demands a graded verdict: argue that balance of power was the framework of the war, not its sole cause.
  • Evidence for: Britain's ententes of 1904 and 1907 to check Germany; the Dreadnought naval race; Belgian neutrality (Treaty of London, 1839) as casus belli.
  • Evidence for: French revanchism over Alsace-Lorraine and Russia's balancing of Austria-Hungary in the Balkans.
  • Beyond the thesis: imperial rivalries (Morocco crises 1905 and 1911, Berlin–Baghdad railway), nationalism (Sarajevo, pan-Slavism), militarism and the arms race.
  • Mechanism point that fetches marks: rigid alliances and mobilisation timetables (Schlieffen Plan) converted the July Crisis into world war.
  • Verdict: the war was fought amid the breakdown of the balance of power rather than purely for its preservation.
Examples to use

Concrete cases, schemes and judgments

  • Entente Cordiale (1904) and Anglo-Russian Convention (1907) completing the Triple Entente
  • Anglo-German Dreadnought naval race
  • Morocco crises of 1905 and 1911 and the Berlin–Baghdad railway project
  • Assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand at Sarajevo, 28 June 1914
  • Schlieffen Plan and rigid mobilisation timetables
  • Britain's entry over Belgian neutrality guaranteed by the Treaty of London (1839)
Keywords / terms

Terminology to weave into the answer

balance of powerWeltpolitikalliance rigidityrevanchismmilitarismJuly Crisis

Share this answer