UPSC CSE 2026 Essay Paper Discussion
GS Paper 2 15 marks · 250w 14 min Hard

Indian Constitution exhibits centralising tendencies to maintain unity and integrity of the nation. Elucidate in the perspective of the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897; The Disaster Management Act, 2005 and recently passed Farm Acts.

Subtopic: Constitution & Polity · federalism and centralising tendencies

Model answer outline

How to structure your answer

Introduction (federation with a unitary bias for unity and integrity) → EDA 1897: state-centric Act with growing central powers (Section 2A, 2020 amendment) → DM Act 2005: binding NDMA directions centralised the COVID response → Farm Acts: Entry 33 List III used to enter State subjects; repeal 2021 → assessment: coordination gains vs bypassed states → Conclusion (consultative federalism via Inter-State Council, Punchhi)
Full model answer

Written within the word limit

267 words · target 250 words · 14 min

The Constitution creates a federation with a deliberate unitary bias — an “indestructible Union of destructible states”. Union supremacy under Article 246, residuary powers (Article 248), emergency provisions, Article 356, All-India Services and single citizenship all tilt power toward the Centre in the name of unity and integrity. Three statutes illustrate how this tendency operates in practice.

Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897

  • Public health is a State subject (Entry 6, List II) and the Act chiefly empowers states (Section 2); yet Section 2A reserves powers over ports and international traffic to the Centre, and the 2020 amendment enlarged central authority to regulate inspection of transport and protect healthcare workers nationwide.

Disaster Management Act, 2005

  • Invoked nationally for the first time during COVID-19, it enabled a Centre-decreed lockdown: NDMA and Home Ministry guidelines bound the states, which needed central concurrence even to relax restrictions. Sections 35 and 62, with the overriding effect of Section 72, gave central directions primacy over state laws — centralising a public-health response that constitutionally belongs to the states.

Farm Acts, 2020

  • Agriculture and markets are State subjects (Entries 14 and 28, List II); the Centre nevertheless legislated through Entry 33, List III (trade and commerce in foodstuffs) to override state APMC systems. Punjab, Rajasthan and Chhattisgarh passed counter-legislation, and sustained protests forced repeal in November 2021.

Assessment

  • Centralisation delivered pandemic coordination and sought a unified national market — but one-size-fits-all lockdowns, the migrant crisis and the farm-law backlash reveal its costs when states are bypassed.

The Constitution intends a strong Centre, not a unitary state. Institutionalised consultation — an active Inter-State Council (Article 263), GST Council-style sectoral bodies for health and agriculture, and the Punchhi Commission's counsel of restraint — can reconcile national unity with federal self-government.

Key points

What an examiner expects to see

  • The constitutional tilt: Article 246 supremacy, residuary power (Article 248), emergency provisions, Article 356, All-India Services and single citizenship privilege unity over classical federalism.
  • The EDA 1897 is state-centric (Section 2), but Section 2A and the 2020 amendment expanded central control over transport inspection and nationwide protection of healthcare workers.
  • The DM Act 2005 enabled a centrally decreed national lockdown: binding NDMA/MHA guidelines (Sections 35, 62) and overriding effect (Section 72), though public health is a State subject (Entry 6, List II).
  • The Farm Acts 2020 used Entry 33, List III to reach into agriculture and markets (Entries 14 and 28, List II); states passed counter-Bills and repeal followed in November 2021.
  • Centralisation aids crisis coordination and a unified market but produces one-size-fits-all failures (migrant crisis) and legitimacy deficits when states are bypassed.
  • Way forward: consultative federalism — an active Inter-State Council (Article 263), GST Council-style sectoral councils, and the Punchhi Commission's recommendations.
Examples to use

Concrete cases, schemes and judgments

  • Nationwide COVID-19 lockdown ordered under the DM Act (March 2020)
  • Epidemic Diseases (Amendment) Act, 2020
  • Punjab and Rajasthan counter-legislation to the Farm Acts
  • Repeal of the three farm laws (November 2021)
  • Punchhi Commission report on Centre–State relations (2010)
Keywords / terms

Terminology to weave into the answer

centralising tendenciesquasi-federalConcurrent ListEntry 33 List IIIcooperative federalismInter-State Council

Share this answer