UPSC CSE 2026 Essay Paper Discussion
GS Paper 1 10 marks · 150w 9 min Medium

India’s official disability prevalence stands at 2.21% (Census 2011) against the WHO’s global estimate of around 16%. Examine the data undercount and assess the gap between the RPwD Act, 2016 and lived exclusion.

Subtopic: Indian Society · Population — Persons with Disabilities

Model answer outline

How to structure your answer

Introduction: India counts persons with disabilities at 2.68 crore (Census 2011, 2.21%); NSO 76th round (2018) again 2.2%. WHO 2022 global figure is roughly 16% — India counts about one-seventh.

Body — three dimensions: (1) Definition shift — RPwD Act, 2016 expanded recognised disabilities from 7 to 21, social model replacing medical model; 4% reservation in government jobs, 5% in higher education. (2) Undercount drivers — narrow definitions, stigma-driven under-reporting, survey design. (3) Implementation gap — Rajive Raturi judgment (8 November 2024) made accessibility a fundamental right; Sugamya Bharat (3 December 2015) — bus accessibility just 8.73%; DEPwD budget ₹1,275 crore, 0.025% of Union Budget; under 40% SIPDA spent in 2024-25.

Conclusion: A fresh disability count in Census 2027 and full SIPDA-DDRC delivery are pre-conditions for converting rights to access.

Full model answer

Written within the word limit

135 words · target 150 words · 9 min

Introduction: India counts persons with disabilities (PwDs) at 2.68 crore (Census 2011, 2.21%) and 2.2% in NSO 76th round (2018), against the WHO Global Report on Disability 2022 estimate of about 16% worldwide — India counts roughly one-seventh of the global benchmark.

Body: The undercount has three roots. First, narrow definitions — though the RPwD Act, 2016 widened recognised disabilities from 7 to 21, including autism, intellectual disability and sickle cell, and adopted a social rather than medical model, with 4% reservation in government jobs and 5% in higher education. Second, stigma-driven under-reporting in census-style surveys. Third, design gaps in enumeration. The Rajive Raturi judgment (8 November 2024) made accessibility a fundamental right; Sugamya Bharat Abhiyan (3 December 2015) records bus accessibility at only 8.73%; DEPwD's Rs 1,275 crore is just 0.025% of the Union Budget.

Conclusion: A fresh disability count in Census 2027 plus full SIPDA-DDRC delivery are pre-conditions for converting RPwD rights into lived access.

Key points

What an examiner expects to see

  • Census 2011 PwD — 2.68 crore, 2.21%
  • WHO Global Report on Disability 2022 — ~16% globally
  • RPwD Act, 2016 — recognised disabilities 7 → 21
  • 4% government job reservation, 5% higher-education reservation
  • UNCRPD ratified 1 October 2007
  • Rajive Raturi v. Union of India (8 November 2024) — accessibility fundamental right
  • Sugamya Bharat Abhiyan launched 3 December 2015
  • Bus accessibility 8.73% (Rajive Raturi 2024 reading)
  • DEPwD allocation ₹1,275 crore for 2025-26 — 0.025% of Union Budget
  • Over 1.1 crore UDID cards generated by mid-2024
Examples to use

Concrete cases, schemes and judgments

  • Autism, intellectual disability, sickle cell among newly recognised
  • UDID Swavlamban card replacing state certificates
  • ADIP scheme for aids and appliances
  • DDRS rehabilitation scheme
  • Inclusive Sansad — accessible Parliament building 2023
Keywords / terms

Terminology to weave into the answer

RPwD Act 2016UNCRPDsocial modelRajive RaturiSugamya BharatUDIDDEPwDundercount
Sources to read

Primary sources and verified references

Persons with Disabilities in India — RPwD Act 2016, UNCRPD and Accessible India https://anantamias.com/persons-with-disability/ Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities https://depwd.gov.in/ WHO Global Report on Disability 2022 https://www.who.int/teams/noncommunicable-diseases/sensory-functions-disability-and-rehabilitation/global-report-on-health-equity-for-persons-with-disabilities

Share this answer