GS Paper 3 15 marks · 250w 14 min Medium
Mob violence is emerging as a serious law and order problem in India. By giving suitable examples, analyze the causes and consequences of such violence.
Subtopic: Internal Security · Mob violence and law and order
How to structure your answer
Introduction: define mob violence and its rise → causes (social, psychological, technological, institutional) → consequences → suitable examples → remedial measures → Conclusion
Written within the word limit
181 words · target 250 words · 14 min
Mob violence, where crowds inflict harm without legal sanction, has surfaced repeatedly in India through lynchings, communal clashes and vigilante attacks. It signals a breakdown of the rule of law and the state's monopoly over legitimate force.
Causes
- Social: communal polarisation, caste tensions, cow-vigilantism and suspicion of "outsiders".
- Psychological: deindividuation and anonymity in crowds erode individual restraint and accountability.
- Technological: viral rumours on WhatsApp and social media, as in child-kidnapping panic lynchings, trigger instant mobs.
- Institutional: weak, slow policing, poor conviction rates and a sense of impunity embolden perpetrators.
Consequences
- Loss of innocent lives and erosion of the right to life under Article 21.
- Communal distrust, social polarisation and damage to India's plural fabric.
- Undermining of the rule of law, deterrence of investment and tarnishing of international image.
Way forward
- Supreme Court's Tehseen Poonawalla (2018) guidelines: nodal officers, fast-track courts and victim compensation.
- A dedicated anti-lynching law, swift FIRs and time-bound prosecution.
- Curbing fake news through platform accountability and digital literacy.
- Community policing and confidence-building to rebuild trust.
Firm, impartial enforcement coupled with social healing is essential to restore the primacy of law over the mob.
What an examiner expects to see
- Mob violence is extra-legal crowd harm signalling erosion of rule of law and state's monopoly on force
- Communal polarisation, caste tension and cow-vigilantism are key social drivers
- Deindividuation and anonymity in crowds reduce individual restraint
- Viral rumours on social media/WhatsApp trigger spontaneous lynchings
- Weak policing, low conviction and impunity embolden mobs
- Consequences include loss of life, communal distrust and damage to India's plural image
- Tehseen Poonawalla (2018) guidelines mandate nodal officers, fast-track courts, compensation
- Anti-lynching law, fake-news curbs and community policing are needed remedies
Concrete cases, schemes and judgments
- Tehseen Poonawalla v. Union of India (2018) Supreme Court anti-lynching guidelines
- WhatsApp rumour-driven child-kidnapping lynchings in Jharkhand, Assam, Maharashtra
- Cow-vigilantism related mob attacks in several states
- Article 21 right to life and dignity
- Manipur/state-level Protection from Lynching Bills as legislative responses
Terminology to weave into the answer
mob lynchingdeindividuationrule of lawTehseen Poonawalla guidelinesfake news and rumourscommunity policing