UPSC CSE 2026 Essay Paper Discussion
GS Paper 3 15 marks · 250w 14 min Hard

Naxalism is a social, economic and developmental issue manifesting as a violent internal security threat. In this context, discuss the emerging issues and suggest a multilayered strategy to tackle the menace of Naxalism.

Subtopic: Internal Security · Left Wing Extremism

Model answer outline

How to structure your answer

Introduction: Naxalism as socio-economic and security challenge → Emerging issues → Multilayered strategy (security, development, governance, rights, rehabilitation) → Conclusion: SAMADHAN and declining footprint
Full model answer

Written within the word limit

191 words · target 250 words · 14 min

Left Wing Extremism (LWE), or Naxalism, is rooted in socio-economic grievances — land alienation, tribal marginalisation, denial of forest rights and developmental neglect — that Maoists exploit to wage armed insurgency. It is thus simultaneously a development deficit and a violent internal-security threat.

Emerging issues

  • Shrinking but consolidating footprint in a few districts of the "Red Corridor" (Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Odisha).
  • Use of IEDs, urban-front organisations and social media for radicalisation.
  • Tribal alienation over land acquisition and mining in fifth-schedule areas.
  • Nexus with extortion, illegal mining and cross-border arms.

A multilayered strategy

  • Security: coordinated CAPF-state police operations, better intelligence, technology (SAMADHAN doctrine), and securing surrendered cadres.
  • Development: road connectivity (RRP), Aspirational Districts Programme, skill and livelihood schemes in affected areas.
  • Governance: plugging the vacuum through local administration, banking and telecom penetration.
  • Tribal rights: effective implementation of the Forest Rights Act 2006 and PESA 1996 to restore trust.
  • Rehabilitation: attractive surrender-and-rehabilitation policies to wean away cadres.
  • Financial choke: cutting off extortion and illegal-mining funding.

Conclusion

The steep fall in LWE-affected districts and violence reflects the success of this dual approach. Sustained convergence of security and inclusive development, anchored in tribal rights and last-mile governance, is the durable answer to Naxalism.

Key points

What an examiner expects to see

  • Naxalism/LWE stems from land alienation, tribal marginalisation and developmental neglect
  • Maoists exploit grievances in the 'Red Corridor' (Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Odisha)
  • Emerging issues: IEDs, urban fronts, social-media radicalisation, mining-linked alienation, extortion nexus
  • Security layer: coordinated CAPF-state operations, intelligence, SAMADHAN doctrine
  • Development layer: road connectivity (RRP), Aspirational Districts, livelihood schemes
  • Governance and financial inclusion fill the administrative vacuum
  • Rights layer: effective Forest Rights Act 2006 and PESA 1996 implementation
  • Rehabilitation and surrender policies plus choking extortion funding
Examples to use

Concrete cases, schemes and judgments

  • SAMADHAN doctrine (MHA) for tackling LWE
  • Sharp decline in LWE-affected districts (from ~126 to a few dozen)
  • Road Requirement Plan and Aspirational Districts Programme in affected areas
  • Forest Rights Act 2006 and PESA 1996 for tribal empowerment
  • Greyhounds (Andhra/Telangana) and CoBRA specialised forces
Keywords / terms

Terminology to weave into the answer

Left Wing ExtremismRed CorridorSAMADHAN doctrineForest Rights ActPESAsurrender-and-rehabilitation

Share this answer