Prabhat was working as Vice President (Marketing) at Sterling Electric Ltd., a reputed multinational company. But presently the company was passing through the difficult times as the sales were continuously showing downward trend in the last two quarters. His division, which hitherto had been a major revenue contributor to the company’s financial health, was now desperately trying to procure some big government order for them. But their best efforts did not yield any positive success or breakthrough. His was a professional company and his local bosses were under pressure from their London-based HO to show some positive results. In the last performance review meeting taken by the Executive Director (India Head), he was reprimanded for his poor performance. He assured them that his division is working on a special contract from the Ministry of Defence for a secret installation near Gwalior and tender is being submitted shortly. He was under extreme pressure and he was deeply perturbed. What aggravated the situation further was a warning from the top that if the deal is not clinched in favour of the company, his division might have to be closed and he may have to quit his lucrative job. There was another dimension which was causing him deep mental torture and agony. This pertained to his personal precarious financial health. He was a single earner in the family with two school-college going children and his old ailing mother. The heavy expenditure on education and medical was causing a big strain to his monthly pay packet. Regular EMI for housing loan taken from bank was unavoidable and any default would render him liable for severe legal action. In the above backdrop, he was hoping for some miracle to happen. There was sudden turn of events. His secretary informed that a gentleman – Subhash Verma wanted to see him as he was interested in the position of Manager which was to be filled in by him in the company. He further brought to his notice that his CV has been received through the office of the Minister of Defence. During interview of the candidate – Subhash Verma, he found him technically sound, resourceful and experienced marketeer. He seemed to be well-conversant with tendering procedures and having knack of follow-up and liaising in this regard. Prabhat felt that he was better choice than the rest of the candidates who were recently interviewed by him in the last few days. Subhash Verma also indicated that he was in possession of the copies of the bid documents that the Unique Electronics Ltd. would be submitting the next day to the Defence Ministry for their tender. He offered to hand over those documents subject to his employment in the company on suitable terms and conditions. He made it clear that in the process, the Sterling Electric Ltd. could outbid their rival company and get the bid and hefty Defence Ministry order. He indicated that it will be win-win situation for both – him and the company. Prabhat was absolutely stunned. It was a mixed feeling of shock and thrill. He was uncomfortable and perspiring. If accepted, all his problems would vanish instantly and he may be rewarded for securing the much awaited tender and thereby boosting company’s sales and financial health. He was in a fix as to the future course of action. He was wonder-struck at the guts of Subhash Verma in having surreptitiously removing his own company papers and offering to the rival company for a job. Being an experienced person, he was examining the pros and cons of the proposal/situation and he asked him to come the next day. (a) Discuss the ethical issues involved in the case. (b) Critically examine the options available to Prabhat in the above situation. (c) Which of the above would be the most appropriate for Prabhat and why?
Subtopic: Case Study · corporate espionage and professional integrity
How to structure your answer
Detailed model answer
332 words · target 250 words · 20 min
Brief facts
Prabhat, Vice President (Marketing) at Sterling Electric, is under intense professional and personal pressure to secure a Ministry of Defence tender. A job candidate, Subhash Verma, offers the stolen bid documents of a rival firm in exchange for employment, promising Sterling a winning bid.
Stakeholders
- Prabhat and his dependent family (children, ailing mother, EMIs).
- Sterling Electric and its integrity and reputation.
- Unique Electronics, the rival firm and victim of document theft.
- The Ministry of Defence and the public interest in fair, secure procurement.
- Subhash Verma.
Ethical issues
- Theft of confidential bid documents — fraud that destroys fair competition.
- Conflict between personal financial distress and professional integrity.
- Corporate espionage compromising sensitive defence procurement and national security.
- Verma's disloyalty to his own firm signals he cannot be trusted.
Options
1. Accept the documents and win the tender. Merit: instant relief from all pressures. Demerit: illegal (cheating, criminal breach of trust), unethical, exposes Prabhat and the firm to prosecution and blacklisting, and compromises defence security.
2. Reject the offer but stay silent, hiring on merit or not at all. Merit: personal integrity preserved. Demerit: the fraudster remains free to approach others; a passive response.
3. Decline the documents and Verma's candidature, and report the attempt to management and, appropriately, to the affected firm and authorities. Merit: upholds law, fairness and defence integrity and deters future fraud. Demerit: short-term career risk and no quick financial relief.
Recommended course of action
Prabhat should adopt Option 3. He must firmly decline both the documents and Verma's candidature, and report the espionage attempt to his Executive Director and, as warranted, to the affected firm and authorities. His hardship, however genuine, cannot justify fraud against a competitor and the nation's defence apparatus. He should compete legitimately, convey the division's honest position to the London HO, and seek institutional support — loan restructuring, financial counselling — for his personal difficulties. A job saved through crime is a career destroyed; integrity has enduring value. The choice reflects the values of probity and the principle that means matter as much as ends.
What an examiner expects to see
- Accepting stolen documents is criminal breach of trust and corporate espionage
- Personal financial distress cannot justify unethical, illegal conduct
- National-security dimension of defence procurement raises the ethical stakes
- Verma's betrayal of his own firm proves his untrustworthiness as a hire
- Right course: decline, refuse the candidature, and report through proper channels
- Address personal hardship via legitimate institutional support, not fraud
- Means matter as much as ends — integrity has long-term value
Concrete cases, schemes and judgments
- Criminal breach of trust and cheating under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita / erstwhile IPC
- Blacklisting and debarment of firms in defence procurement for malpractice
- Trusteeship and value-based leadership (Tata group ethos)
- Employee assistance / financial counselling as legitimate support for distress