GS Paper 4 20 marks · 250w 20 min Hard
Raman is a senior IPS officer and has recently been posted as D.G. of a state. Among the various issues and problems/challenges which needed his immediate attention, the issue relating to recruitment of unemployed youth by an unknown terrorist group, was a matter of grave concern. It was noted that unemployment was relatively high in the state. The problem of unemployment amongst graduates and those with higher education was much more grave. Thus they were vulnerable and soft targets. In the review meeting taken by him with senior officers of DIG Range and above, it came to light that a new terrorist group has emerged at the global level. It has launched a massive drive to recruit young unemployed people. Special focus was to pick young people from a particular community. The said organisation seemed to have the clear objective of utilising/using them for carrying out militant activities. It was also gathered that the said (new) group is desperately trying to spread its tentacles in his state. A definite/reliable intelligence tip was received by the State CID and Cyber Cell that a large number of such unemployed youth have already been contacted by the terrorist outfit/group through social media and local communal organisations and other contacts. The need of the hour was to act swiftly and to check these elements/designs before they assume serious proportions. Discrete inquiries made by the police, through the Cyber Cell, revealed that good numbers of unemployed youth are very active on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter. On an average, many of them were spending 6-8 hours each day, using electronic devices/internet, etc. It also came to light that such unemployed youth were showing sympathy and endorsing the messages received from certain persons, allegedly the contact persons of that global terrorist group. Their social media accounts revealed their strong affinity to such groups inasmuch as many of them started forwarding anti-national tweets on their WhatsApp and Facebook, etc. It seemed that they succumbed to their ploy and started propagating secessionist ideology. Their posts were hyper-critical of the government’s initiatives, policies and subscribing to extreme beliefs and promoting extremism. (a) What are the options available to Raman to tackle the above situation? (b) What measures would you suggest for strengthening the existing set-up to ensure that such groups do not succeed in penetrating and vitiating the atmosphere in the state? (c) In the above scenario, what action plan would you advise for enhancing the intelligence gathering mechanism of the police force?
Subtopic: Case Study · counter-radicalisation and internal security
How to structure your answer
Introduction → summarise facts and stakeholders → identify ethical and administrative issues → (a) options for Raman → (b) measures to strengthen the set-up → (c) action plan for intelligence gathering → recommended course of action → Conclusion
Written within the word limit
237 words · target 250 words · 20 min
Facts and stakeholders
DG Raman confronts an online radicalisation drive by a new terror outfit targeting unemployed, educated youth of a particular community. Stakeholders: the vulnerable youth and their families, the targeted community, the police and intelligence agencies, the state, and society at large. The core tension is protecting national security while safeguarding civil liberties and preventing communal alienation.
(a) Options available to Raman
- Purely coercive action: swift arrests and monitoring. Effective as deterrence but risks alienating the community and creating fresh grievance.
- Purely developmental/soft approach: skilling and counselling. Addresses root causes but is slow against an active threat.
- A balanced strategy combining lawful surveillance, counter-radicalisation, community engagement and de-radicalisation. This is the ethically and operationally sound course.
(b) Strengthening the set-up
- Community-policing and mohalla committees to rebuild trust and isolate recruiters.
- De-radicalisation and rehabilitation cells with psychologists, religious scholars and reformed individuals (Maharashtra's model is instructive).
- Linking employability schemes (Skill India, PMKVY) to at-risk youth to remove the economic push factor.
- Counter-narratives online and digital-literacy drives to inoculate youth against propaganda.
(c) Enhancing intelligence gathering
- Strengthen Cyber Cell and social-media analytics with lawful interception under due process.
- Deepen HUMINT through local networks and improved Centre-State intelligence sharing (MAC/NATGRID).
- Train personnel in OSINT and community sourcing while respecting privacy safeguards (Puttaswamy).
Recommended course
Raman should adopt the balanced strategy: pre-empt imminent threats lawfully, but pair enforcement with development, community trust and de-radicalisation, so security is achieved without communalising the response.
What an examiner expects to see
- Central conflict: national security versus civil liberties and communal harmony
- Blanket coercion risks alienating the community and manufacturing new grievance
- Balanced strategy: lawful surveillance + counter-radicalisation + community engagement + rehabilitation
- Root cause is unemployment among educated youth; link Skill India/PMKVY to remove push factors
- De-radicalisation cells with psychologists, scholars and reformed individuals
- Intelligence upgrade via Cyber Cell, HUMINT, MAC/NATGRID sharing and OSINT
- Surveillance must respect due process and privacy (Puttaswamy 2017)
Concrete cases, schemes and judgments
- Maharashtra ATS de-radicalisation and counselling model
- Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana (PMKVY) / Skill India for youth employability
- Multi-Agency Centre (MAC) and NATGRID for intelligence sharing
- K.S. Puttaswamy v Union of India (2017) on the right to privacy limiting surveillance
Terminology to weave into the answer
counter-radicalisationcommunity policingde-radicalisationOSINT/HUMINTcivil liberties