UPSC CSE 2026 Essay Paper Discussion
GS Paper 1 10 marks · 150w 9 min Medium

Regionalism in India is the politics of perceived neglect of resources, identity and recognition. Discuss with reference to demands for sub-state autonomy, river-water disputes and the Sixth Schedule areas.

Subtopic: Indian Society · Regionalism

Model answer outline

How to structure your answer

Introduction: Distinguish regionalism (loyalty to a sub-national region) from secessionism. Frame three forms: linguistic/cultural, resource-based, identity-based.

Body — three dimensions: (1) Sub-state autonomy — Telangana statehood 2 June 2014 after agitation since 1969; Vidarbha, Bodoland, Gorkhaland; Article 371-A through 371-J special provisions. (2) Resource disputes — Cauvery (Karnataka–Tamil Nadu), Krishna (Telangana–Andhra), Mahanadi (Odisha–Chhattisgarh), Sutlej-Yamuna Link (Punjab–Haryana). (3) Sixth Schedule — Bodoland Territorial Region 2003, Karbi Anglong Autonomous Council; Ladakh's demand for Sixth Schedule status since 2019.

Conclusion: Linguistic federalism (Fazl Ali Commission 1955), the Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956 and the Sixth Schedule are the constitutional answers — they manage regionalism but cannot dissolve the grievances that fuel it.

Full model answer

Written within the word limit

138 words · target 150 words · 9 min

Introduction: Regionalism, distinct from secessionism, is loyalty to a sub-national region rooted in perceived neglect of resources, identity or recognition; it takes linguistic, resource-based and identity-based forms.

Body: Sub-state autonomy is the first form: Telangana, India's 29th state, was created on 2 June 2014 under the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act 2014, after agitation since 1969; Vidarbha, Bodoland and Gorkhaland demands continue; Articles 371-A to 371-J grant special provisions to Nagaland, Mizoram and Hyderabad-Karnataka. Resource disputes form the second: Cauvery (Karnataka–Tamil Nadu, Supreme Court 2018 award), Krishna, Mahanadi and the Sutlej-Yamuna Link sustain inter-state friction under the Inter-State River Water Disputes Act 1956. Identity-based regionalism animates the Sixth Schedule — Bodoland Territorial Region (2003, expanded 2020), Karbi Anglong, and Ladakh's demand for Sixth Schedule status since 2019.

Conclusion: The Fazl Ali Commission (1955) framework manages regionalism; it does not dissolve the grievances of resource and recognition that fuel it.

Key points

What an examiner expects to see

  • Telangana created 2 June 2014, 29th state
  • Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014
  • Bodoland Territorial Region constituted 2003, expanded 2020 Accord
  • Article 371-A (Nagaland), 371-G (Mizoram), 371-J (Hyderabad-Karnataka)
  • Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal 1990; Supreme Court 2018 final award
  • Sutlej-Yamuna Link canal — Supreme Court 2002 verdict
  • Ladakh demand for Sixth Schedule, post-Article 370 abrogation 2019
  • Sixth Schedule covers Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, Mizoram
  • Fazl Ali Commission Report, 30 September 1955
Examples to use

Concrete cases, schemes and judgments

  • Telangana statehood movement led by K. Chandrashekar Rao
  • Gorkhaland Territorial Administration (GTA), 2011
  • Karbi Anglong Autonomous Council, Assam
  • Mahanadi Water Disputes Tribunal, 2018
  • Marathi-Kannada Belgaum border dispute
Keywords / terms

Terminology to weave into the answer

regionalismSixth Scheduleriver-water disputeArticle 371autonomous councillinguistic federalismISRWD ActTelangana
Sources to read

Primary sources and verified references

Communal Violence in India: Causes, Major Incidents and Government Response https://anantamias.com/communal-violence/ Fundamental Rights and Articles https://anantamias.com/fundamental-rights-and-articles/ Ministry of Tribal Affairs — Sixth Schedule Areas https://tribal.nic.in/SixthSchedule.aspx

Share this answer