UPSC CSE 2026 Essay Paper Discussion
GS Paper 2 15 marks · 250w 14 min Hard

‘Terrorism has become a significant threat to global peace and security.’ Evaluate the effectiveness of the United Nations Security Council’s Counter Terrorism Committee (CTC) and its associated bodies in addressing and mitigating this threat at the international level.

Subtopic: International Relations · UN counter-terrorism architecture

Model answer outline

How to structure your answer

Introduction (terrorism as a transnational threat) → CTC and its associated bodies → achievements/effectiveness → structural limitations (no definition, veto, state sponsorship) → India's role and reform agenda → Conclusion (need for reformed multilateralism)
Full model answer

Written within the word limit

199 words · target 250 words · 14 min

Transnational terrorism, amplified by new technologies, financing networks and safe havens, directly threatens global peace and security. The UN Security Council's Counter-Terrorism Committee (CTC), created by Resolution 1373 (2001) after 9/11, anchors the multilateral response, supported by the Counter-Terrorism Committee Executive Directorate (CTED), the 1267 ISIL/Al-Qaida Sanctions Committee and the 1540 Committee on WMD non-proliferation.

Effectiveness and achievements

  • Resolution 1373 obliged all states to criminalise terror financing, freeze assets and tighten borders, building a near-universal legal baseline.
  • The 1267 regime enables targeted sanctions, travel bans and asset freezes on listed individuals and entities.
  • CTED country assessments and capacity-building have strengthened national frameworks and FATF-aligned financing controls.

Structural limitations

  • The absence of a universal legal definition of terrorism weakens enforcement; India's Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism remains stalled.
  • Great-power politics and the veto paralyse listings, as with the years-long blocking of Masood Azhar until 2019.
  • State sponsorship, non-state actors and encrypted technologies outpace the Council's tools.

India's contribution

India chaired the CTC in 2022, hosting special sessions in Mumbai and Delhi that produced the Delhi Declaration on countering the misuse of drones, crypto and the internet.

Thus the CTC has set essential norms but remains only partially effective; genuine progress needs a reformed, depoliticised Security Council and a binding comprehensive convention.

Key points

What an examiner expects to see

  • CTC was established by UNSC Resolution 1373 (2001) after the 9/11 attacks.
  • Associated bodies: CTED (Res 1535), the 1267 ISIL/Al-Qaida Sanctions Committee, and the 1540 Committee.
  • Resolution 1373 mandated universal criminalisation of terror financing, asset freezes and border controls.
  • The 1267 regime enables targeted sanctions, travel bans and asset freezes.
  • Lack of a universal definition of terrorism weakens enforcement.
  • Veto politics delay listings (e.g., Masood Azhar blocked until 2019).
  • State sponsorship and new technologies outpace existing UN tools.
  • India chaired the CTC in 2022 and steered the Delhi Declaration on emerging terror technologies.
Examples to use

Concrete cases, schemes and judgments

  • UNSC Resolution 1373 (2001) and the 1267 Sanctions Committee
  • Counter-Terrorism Committee Executive Directorate (CTED)
  • Blocking and eventual 2019 listing of Masood Azhar
  • India's proposed Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism (CCIT)
  • 2022 CTC special meetings in Mumbai/Delhi and the Delhi Declaration
  • FATF cooperation on countering terror financing
Keywords / terms

Terminology to weave into the answer

Counter-Terrorism CommitteeResolution 13731267 sanctions regimeComprehensive Convention on International Terrorismterror financingveto paralysis

Share this answer