GS Paper 2 10 marks · 200w 14 min Hard
The concept of Mid Day Meal (MDM) scheme is almost a century old in India with early beginnings in Madras Presidency in pre-independent India. The scheme has again been given impetus in most states in the last two decades. Critically examine its twin objectives, latest mandates and success.
Subtopic: Social Justice · welfare schemes — Mid Day Meal / PM POSHAN
How to structure your answer
Introduction → evolution: Madras Corporation 1925 to NP-NSPE 1995 to PM POSHAN 2021 → twin objectives: education and nutrition → latest mandates: NFSA 2013 norms, expanded coverage, fortification → successes with evidence → critical gaps: safety, discrimination, funds → Conclusion
Written within the word limit
219 words · target 200 words · 14 min
School feeding in India began with the Madras Corporation in 1925; the national programme took shape as the National Programme of Nutritional Support to Primary Education (1995) and became a cooked-meal entitlement after the Supreme Court's orders in PUCL v. Union of India (2001). It continues today as PM POSHAN (2021).
Twin Objectives
- Educational: raising enrolment, retention and attendance by countering classroom hunger.
- Nutritional: supplementing child nutrition — with social equalisation through common dining as an implicit third aim.
Latest Mandates
- A statutory entitlement under the National Food Security Act, 2013, with norms of 450 kcal and 12 g protein for primary and 700 kcal and 20 g protein for upper-primary children.
- Coverage extended to upper primary (2007) and, under PM POSHAN, to Balvatika pre-primary children; fortified rice, school nutrition gardens, tithi bhojan and social audits added.
Success — and Critical Gaps
- The world's largest school meal programme, covering about 11–12 crore children; studies record gains in attendance and retention, especially for girls and disadvantaged groups, and nutrition protection in drought years.
- But quality and safety lapses persist — the 2013 Saran (Bihar) tragedy killed 23 children; caste discrimination in cooking and seating, delayed fund flows and cook honoraria, and diversion of teacher time remain documented weaknesses, while NFHS-5 shows child undernutrition stubbornly high.
The scheme has delivered on schooling more clearly than on nutrition; tighter safety protocols, timely funds and convergence with Poshan 2.0 are the way forward.
What an examiner expects to see
- Twin objectives: education (enrolment, retention, attendance) and nutrition, with social equalisation through common dining as an implicit third objective.
- Lineage: Madras Corporation (1925) → NP-NSPE (1995) → cooked meals after the PUCL (2001) Supreme Court orders → NFSA 2013 statutory entitlement → PM POSHAN (2021).
- Current norms: 450 kcal/12 g protein (primary) and 700 kcal/20 g (upper primary); roughly 11–12 crore children covered — the world's largest school feeding programme.
- Evidence of success: higher attendance and retention, strongest for girls and disadvantaged groups; drought-time nutrition protection; a site of caste-mixing.
- Critical failures: the 2013 Saran (Bihar) tragedy (23 deaths), caste discrimination incidents, delayed funds and cook honoraria, weak quality monitoring.
- Balanced verdict: stronger educational than nutritional impact — needs safety protocols, social audits and convergence with Saksham Anganwadi and Poshan 2.0.
Concrete cases, schemes and judgments
- PUCL v. Union of India (2001): Supreme Court directed cooked mid day meals in all government primary schools.
- Saran district, Bihar (July 2013): 23 children died after a pesticide-contaminated meal.
- Empirical work by Jean Dreze and co-authors showing enrolment and attendance gains, particularly for girls.
- PM POSHAN (2021): Balvatika coverage, tithi bhojan, school nutrition gardens, fortified rice.
Terminology to weave into the answer
PM POSHANNFSA 2013classroom hungersocial equalisationschool feeding programmePoshan 2.0