UPSC CSE 2026 Essay Paper Discussion
History Optional Paper II 10 marks · 150w 9 min Medium

‘The League of Nations failed to achieve its objectives of maintaining international peace and security.’ Analyse the major factors responsible for its failure during the period 1919-1946.

Subtopic: Paper II · Why the League of Nations failed, 1919-1946

Model answer outline

How to structure your answer

Separate structural defects from political failures, evidence with the three test cases, then note what it did achieve.

Full model answer

Detailed model answer

288 words · target 150 words · 9 min

Structural defects.

  • Absent great powers. The United States never joined, the Senate having rejected the Treaty; Germany was admitted only in 1926 and left in 1933; the USSR joined in 1934 and was expelled in 1939. A body missing the strongest states could not enforce anything.
  • No armed force. The League could recommend but not compel; Article 16 sanctions depended on members choosing to apply them.
  • The unanimity rule in the Council and Assembly allowed any interested party to block action.
  • Birth defect. The Covenant was Part I of the Treaty of Versailles, so the League was identified with a settlement its critics regarded as unjust, and defending the treaty became indistinguishable from defending the League.

Political failures — the three tests.

  • Manchuria, 1931. Japan invaded; the Lytton Commission reported in 1932 that aggression had occurred; the League adopted the report and Japan simply withdrew in 1933, without consequence.
  • Abyssinia, 1935. Sanctions on Italy excluded oil and left the Suez Canal open, and the Hoare-Laval Pact revealed that Britain and France were privately prepared to reward the aggressor. This destroyed the League's credibility.
  • The Rhineland, 1936, and Austria and Czechoslovakia thereafter, went unchallenged.

The underlying causes. The World Disarmament Conference of 1932-34 collapsed. The Great Depression turned states inward towards autarky and tariffs. Britain and France pursued national policies — appeasement and security respectively — through the League when convenient and around it when not.

What it did achieve. It settled the Aaland Islands, Upper Silesia and the Mosul dispute; the Nansen passport system aided refugees; and the ILO and its health and social work survived it, passing into the United Nations, which was designed specifically to correct its defects — universal membership, great-power engagement through the veto, and enforcement powers in the Security Council. The League was formally dissolved on 18 April 1946.

Key points

What an examiner expects to see

  • Absent great powers. The United States never joined, the Senate having rejected the Treaty; Germany was admitted only in 1926 and left in 1933; the USSR joined in 1934 and was expelled in 1939. A body missing the strongest states could not enforce anything.
  • No armed force. The League could recommend but not compel; Article 16 sanctions depended on members choosing to apply them.
  • The unanimity rule in the Council and Assembly allowed any interested party to block action.
  • Birth defect. The Covenant was Part I of the Treaty of Versailles, so the League was identified with a settlement its critics regarded as unjust, and defending the treaty became indistinguishable from defending the League.
  • Manchuria, 1931. Japan invaded; the Lytton Commission reported in 1932 that aggression had occurred; the League adopted the report and Japan simply withdrew in 1933, without consequence.
  • Abyssinia, 1935. Sanctions on Italy excluded oil and left the Suez Canal open, and the Hoare-Laval Pact revealed that Britain and France were privately prepared to reward the aggressor. This destroyed the League's credibility.
  • The Rhineland, 1936, and Austria and Czechoslovakia thereafter, went unchallenged.

Share this answer