GS Paper 3 12.5 marks · 200w 14 min Medium
Use of Internet and social media by non-state actors for subversive activities is a major security concern. How have these been misused in the recent past? Suggest effective guidelines to curb the above threat.
Subtopic: Internal Security · Cyber security and misuse of social media
How to structure your answer
Introduction: internet/social media as a double-edged tool → misuse by non-state actors → recent instances → guidelines to curb → balancing rights → Conclusion
Written within the word limit
194 words · target 200 words · 14 min
The internet and social media are powerful tools of connectivity, but the same anonymity, reach and speed are exploited by non-state actors — terror outfits, extremists and hostile networks — for subversive ends, making cyberspace a frontier of internal security.
How they are misused
- Radicalisation and recruitment through encrypted platforms and propaganda videos.
- Mobilisation and incitement to violence, riots and mass panic via rumours and doctored content.
- Terror financing, coordination and operational planning using encrypted messaging.
- Disinformation, deepfakes and psychological operations to polarise society.
- Cyber-attacks on critical infrastructure and dark-web arms/drug trade.
Guidelines to curb the threat
- Robust legal framework: enforce the IT Act and IT Rules, and hold intermediaries accountable for prompt takedown and traceability of unlawful content.
- Strengthen cyber institutions: CERT-In, the National Cyber Coordination Centre and I4C, with a dedicated cyber-crime response.
- Counter-radicalisation and counter-narratives online, and digital-literacy campaigns.
- Cooperation with platforms and international agencies on cross-border content and evidence.
- Real-time monitoring balanced with privacy safeguards under the Puttaswamy proportionality test.
The response must balance security with the fundamental right to privacy and free speech — targeted, lawful and proportionate action against misuse, backed by public awareness, rather than blanket surveillance or arbitrary shutdowns.
What an examiner expects to see
- Internet/social media offer anonymity, reach and speed that non-state actors exploit for subversion.
- Misuse: online radicalisation and recruitment via encrypted platforms and propaganda.
- Mobilisation, incitement, rumours and doctored content trigger violence and panic.
- Encrypted messaging used for terror financing, coordination and operational planning.
- Disinformation, deepfakes and psy-ops polarise society; cyber-attacks target critical infrastructure.
- Guidelines: enforce IT Act/IT Rules with intermediary accountability, takedown and traceability.
- Strengthen CERT-In, NCCC, I4C and cyber-crime response; build counter-narratives and digital literacy.
- Balance monitoring with the right to privacy (Puttaswamy proportionality) and free speech.
Concrete cases, schemes and judgments
- IT Rules 2021 requiring intermediary due diligence, grievance officers and traceability.
- Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C) and the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal.
- CERT-In and the National Cyber Coordination Centre (NCCC).
- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (2017) recognising privacy as a fundamental right with proportionality test.
- Rumour-driven mob violence and use of social media in recruitment by extremist groups.
Terminology to weave into the answer
cyber securityonline radicalisationintermediary liabilityCERT-Indisinformationproportionality