GS Paper 2 10 marks · 150w 9 min Easy
Why do you think the committees are considered to be useful for parliamentary work? Discuss, in this context, the role of the Estimates Committee.
Subtopic: Constitution & Polity · Parliament and parliamentary committees
How to structure your answer
Introduction (why Parliament works through committees) → usefulness: detailed scrutiny, expertise, consensus, continuous accountability → Estimates Committee: composition and election, origin, functions as a continuous economy committee → limitations → Conclusion
Detailed model answer
219 words · target 150 words · 9 min
With limited floor time and increasingly technical business, Parliament legislates and oversees substantially through its committees — often called mini-Parliaments — which allow detailed, expert and relatively non-partisan scrutiny.
Why Committees Are Useful
- Clause-by-clause examination of bills and demands for grants that the full House cannot attempt.
- Access to expertise through evidence from officials, domain specialists and stakeholders.
- Deliberation away from cameras curbs grandstanding and fosters cross-party consensus.
- Continuous accountability of the executive between sessions, through financial committees and 24 department-related standing committees.
Role of the Estimates Committee
- Largest parliamentary committee: 30 members, all from the Lok Sabha, elected annually by proportional representation through the single transferable vote; ministers cannot be members; the Speaker appoints the chairperson.
- Constituted in 1950 on the recommendation of John Mathai.
- Reports what economies, organizational improvements and administrative reforms consistent with the policy underlying the estimates may be effected; suggests alternative policies for efficiency; examines whether money is well laid out; recommends the form in which estimates are presented — hence a 'continuous economy committee'.
- Limitations: it examines estimates only after the budget is voted, cannot question the policy approved by Parliament, works without CAG assistance (unlike the PAC), and its recommendations are advisory.
Even so, by auditing economy and efficiency round the year, the Estimates Committee helps convert the budget from an annual ritual into a continuing exercise in financial accountability.
What an examiner expects to see
- Rationale for committees: time scarcity, technical complexity, detailed scrutiny, expert evidence, off-camera consensus, inter-session accountability.
- Estimates Committee composition: 30 members, Lok Sabha only, elected annually by proportional representation via single transferable vote; ministers barred; Speaker appoints the chair.
- Origin: constituted in 1950 on John Mathai's recommendation — the post-Independence successor to the pre-1947 Standing Finance Committee tradition.
- Functions: suggest economies and administrative reform within approved policy, propose alternative policies, examine whether money is well laid out, advise on the form of estimates.
- Its 'continuous economy committee' character — examination continues through the year on selected ministries.
- Limitations for balance: post-facto examination of voted estimates, no CAG support, advisory recommendations, cannot question Parliament-approved policy.
Concrete cases, schemes and judgments
- The three financial committees — Public Accounts, Estimates, and Public Undertakings — as Parliament's core instruments of fiscal oversight.
- 24 department-related standing committees (since 1993) examining demands for grants of every ministry.
- PAC's convention of an opposition chairperson versus the Estimates Committee chaired by a ruling-party member appointed by the Speaker — a useful contrast.
Terminology to weave into the answer
mini-Parliamentfinancial committeessingle transferable votecontinuous economy committeedemands for grantsparliamentary oversight