With respect to the South China sea, maritime territorial disputes and rising tension affirm the need for safeguarding maritime security to ensure freedom of navigation and over flight throughout the region. In this context, discuss the bilateral issues between India and China.
Subtopic: International Relations · India–China relations
How to structure your answer
Written within the word limit
230 words · target 200 words · 14 min
Introduction
Tensions in the South China Sea—China's nine-dash line claims, rejected by the 2016 PCA award in the Philippines case, and militarised artificial islands—touch India directly: over half of India's trade transits these waters, and ONGC Videsh explores hydrocarbons in blocks offered by Vietnam. Maritime friction thus overlays an already crowded bilateral agenda with China.
Key bilateral issues
- Unsettled boundary: differing perceptions of the LAC across Aksai Chin and Arunachal Pradesh have produced repeated stand-offs—Depsang (2013), Chumar (2014), Doklam (2017) and Galwan (2020)—with the October 2024 patrolling agreement only beginning normalisation.
- Sovereignty irritants: stapled visas for residents of Arunachal Pradesh and J&K, China's renaming of Arunachal locations, and CPEC running through Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.
- Economic asymmetry: a bilateral trade deficit approaching $100 billion, concentrated in electronics, machinery and pharmaceutical ingredients, creates strategic dependence even as China restricts market access for Indian pharma and IT services.
- Water security: limited hydrological data-sharing on the Brahmaputra and China's approval of the giant Medog dam raise lower-riparian anxieties.
- Maritime competition: Chinese port footholds across the Indian Ocean, the Djibouti base and survey vessels near Indian waters; conversely, India's naval outreach and freedom-of-navigation stance in the South China Sea irks Beijing.
Conclusion
India's response mixes deterrence with dialogue: border infrastructure and mountain forces, Quad and ASEAN partnerships, supply-chain de-risking, and consistent insistence on UNCLOS-compliant freedom of navigation and overflight—engaging China while refusing to let the maritime order be rewritten unilaterally.
What an examiner expects to see
- Anchor the SCS context: nine-dash line, 2016 PCA award in Philippines v. China, and India's trade transit plus ONGC Videsh interests off Vietnam
- Core bilateral issue is the unresolved LAC — Aksai Chin and Arunachal claims with recurring stand-offs from Depsang 2013 to Galwan 2020
- October 2024 patrolling agreement marks cautious normalisation, not settlement
- Sovereignty irritants: stapled visas, renaming of Arunachal places, CPEC through PoK
- Structural economic asymmetry — trade deficit near $100 billion in strategic goods
- Brahmaputra data-sharing and the Medog mega-dam as emerging water-security friction
- Maritime dimension cuts both ways: China's IOR footprint vs India's SCS presence and freedom-of-navigation position
Concrete cases, schemes and judgments
- 2016 PCA award in Philippines v. China invalidating the nine-dash line
- ONGC Videsh exploration in Vietnamese blocks in the South China Sea
- Galwan valley clash (2020) and the October 2024 India-China patrolling agreement
- China's approval of the Medog (Yarlung Tsangpo) mega-dam
- Chinese base at Djibouti and port projects at Gwadar and Hambantota