GS Paper 2 10 marks · 150w 9 min Medium
“With the waning of globalization, post-Cold War world is becoming a site of sovereign nationalism.” Elucidate.
Subtopic: International Relations · globalization & sovereign nationalism
How to structure your answer
Introduction: hyper-globalization peaked by 2008; 'slowbalisation' since → Manifestations of sovereign nationalism: economic, political, security, digital, identity → Drivers: financial crisis, COVID-19, Ukraine war, US-China rivalry → Counterpoint: regionalization and re-globalization rather than de-globalization → Conclusion: implications for India's strategic autonomy
Detailed model answer
180 words · target 150 words · 9 min
Post-Cold War globalization — hyper-integration of trade, capital, people and ideas — peaked around the 2008 financial crisis. Since then 'slowbalisation' has set in, and states are reasserting sovereign control over economics, borders and information.
Manifestations of sovereign nationalism
- Economic: US-China tariff and technology wars, semiconductor export controls, reshoring and friend-shoring, and industrial policy — the US CHIPS Act, Atmanirbhar Bharat, China's dual circulation.
- Political: Brexit, retreat from multilateral commitments, paralysis of the WTO Appellate Body, hardened immigration politics across Europe and the USA.
- Security: weaponization of sanctions and payment systems, energy nationalism after the Ukraine war, vaccine nationalism during COVID-19.
- Digital: data-localization mandates, platform bans and 'splinternet' tendencies asserting cyber sovereignty.
- Identity: civilizational-state narratives and majoritarian nationalism supplying domestic legitimacy to economic closure.
A qualified reading
- Globalization is fragmenting, not ending: regional blocs (RCEP), minilaterals (I2U2), new corridors (IMEC) and expanding digital-services trade point to re-globalization along geopolitical lines — what the IMF calls geoeconomic fragmentation.
For India, the moment validates strategic autonomy: multi-alignment, diversified supply chains and bilateral trade pacts, while continuing to defend the open, rules-based order on which its own growth depends.
What an examiner expects to see
- Frame the claim: hyper-globalization peaked by 2008; trade-to-GDP has plateaued since — 'slowbalisation' (The Economist) and 'geoeconomic fragmentation' (IMF) are the operative concepts.
- Economic nationalism: tariff wars, export controls on semiconductors, reshoring/friend-shoring, industrial policies (CHIPS Act, Atmanirbhar Bharat, dual circulation).
- Political sovereignty reassertion: Brexit, WTO Appellate Body paralysis, weakening of multilateral commitments, anti-immigration politics.
- Securitized interdependence: sanctions and SWIFT weaponization, post-Ukraine energy nationalism, COVID-era vaccine nationalism and export bans.
- Digital sovereignty: data localization, platform bans, splinternet tendencies.
- Counterpoint for balance: globalization is mutating into regionalization and minilateralism (RCEP, I2U2, IMEC); digital and services trade keep growing.
- Conclude with India: strategic autonomy and multi-alignment — de-risking supply chains while defending an open trading order.
Concrete cases, schemes and judgments
- Brexit referendum (2016) and UK exit (2020)
- US semiconductor export controls on China (2022 onward) and the CHIPS and Science Act
- COVID-19 vaccine export restrictions by producer nations
- Post-2022 sanctions on Russia and Europe's energy decoupling
- Atmanirbhar Bharat and PLI schemes
- IMEC corridor announced at the G20 New Delhi Summit (2023)
Terminology to weave into the answer
slowbalisationgeoeconomic fragmentationfriend-shoringeconomic nationalismdigital sovereigntystrategic autonomy