UPSC CSE 2026 Essay Paper Discussion
GS Paper 4 20 marks · 250w 20 min Hard

You are heading the rescue operations in an area affected by severe natural calamity. Thousands of people are rendered homeless and deprived of food, drinking water and other basic amenities. Rescue work has been disrupted by heavy rainfall and damage to supply routes. The local people are seething with anger against the delayed limited rescue operations. When your team reaches the affected area, the people there heckle and even assault some of the team members. One of your team members is even severely injured. Faced with this crisis, some team members plead with you to call off the operations fearing threats to their life. In such trying circumstances, what will be your response? Examine the qualities of a public servant which will be required to manage the situation.

Subtopic: Case Study · crisis leadership in disaster rescue

Model answer outline

How to structure your answer

Brief facts → stakeholders → ethical/administrative dilemma (duty to victims vs safety of team) → options with merits/demerits → recommended course of action → qualities of a public servant required.
Full model answer

Written within the word limit

285 words · target 250 words · 20 min

Facts

As head of rescue operations after a severe natural calamity, I face angry, suffering victims who have heckled and assaulted my team, injuring one member. Some team members, fearing for their lives, plead to call off operations. I must balance my duty to save lives against my responsibility for my team's safety.

Stakeholders

  • The homeless, hungry victims awaiting rescue.
  • My rescue team, including the injured member and the frightened ones.
  • Myself as the leader accountable for both mission and men.
  • The administration and the wider society watching the response.

Ethical issues

  • Conflict between the duty to the vulnerable and the duty of care to my team.
  • Maintaining team morale and unity under fear and provocation.
  • Responding to public anger with empathy rather than retaliation.

Options

  • Call off operations: protects the team immediately, but abandons dying victims, betrays public duty and worsens the crisis — unacceptable.
  • Continue unchanged: honours duty but exposes the team to further harm — irresponsible leadership.
  • Continue with safeguards (preferred): resume operations after securing police/security escort and de-escalating public anger.

Recommended course of action

  • First, ensure immediate medical care for the injured member and reassure the frightened team.
  • Request police/local security to protect the team and restore order.
  • Engage community leaders and elders to explain constraints, absorb anger and win cooperation — the crowd's anger stems from suffering, not malice.
  • Reorganise for faster, visible relief — prioritise food, water and medical aid — so trust returns.
  • Lead from the front to sustain team morale; do not abandon the mission.

Qualities required

The situation demands courage and composure under threat, empathy for both victims and team, emotional intelligence to de-escalate anger, decisiveness and leadership to keep the team together, resilience to persist, and communication skills to rebuild trust with the community.

Key points

What an examiner expects to see

  • Core dilemma: duty to save vulnerable victims versus the duty of care to one's own team.
  • Immediate priority: medical care for the injured member and reassurance to the frightened team.
  • Secure police/security escort to protect the team and restore order before resuming.
  • Engage community leaders to de-escalate anger rooted in suffering, not hostility.
  • Reorganise for faster, visible relief to rebuild public trust and cooperation.
  • Abandoning the operation is unacceptable; continuing without safeguards is irresponsible.
  • Qualities: courage, composure, empathy, emotional intelligence, leadership, resilience, communication.
Examples to use

Concrete cases, schemes and judgments

  • NDRF operations in Kerala floods (2018) and Uttarakhand — rescue amid hostile, distressed crowds.
  • District administration coordination under the Disaster Management Act, 2005.
  • Community-liaison models used in cyclone relief in Odisha (Cyclone Fani, 2019).
  • Emotional-intelligence-led crisis leadership de-escalating public anger.
Keywords / terms

Terminology to weave into the answer

crisis leadershipduty of carede-escalationemotional intelligencemoral couragedisaster response

Share this answer