Constitutional Architecture of the Indian Federation: Articles 245 to 263 and the Unitary Tilt

Ask where residuary powers lie and you have identified the federation’s centre of gravity. In the United States and Australia they sit with the states. In India, Article 248 vests them exclusively with Parliament. The constitutional architecture of the Indian federation is built around that choice, and it is why the system is described as quasi-federal rather than federal.

Legislative Relations: Articles 245 to 255

How these have actually been used.

• Article 246 and Entry 97. Residuary power has carried cybercrime, data protection, outer space, cryptocurrency, drones and satellite communication, subjects that did not exist when the lists were drawn.
• Article 249. Used in 1952 for essential commodities; its availability shaped Centre-state dynamics during the farm law dispute of 2020.
• Article 250. Used during the 1962 and 1971 conflicts, with laws lapsing six months after the Emergency ended.
• Article 252. The Prize Competition Act 1955 and the Transplantation of Human Organs Act 1994, both enacted at states’ own request.
• Article 253. The Wildlife Protection Act 1972 implementing CITES, and the Environment Protection Act 1986 implementing the Stockholm Declaration, both bypassing state consent through the treaty route.
• Article 254. The Kerala Rent Control Act prevailed with Presidential assent, though M. Karunanidhi v. Union of India (1979) confirmed the Centre may override by fresh legislation.
• Articles 200 and 201. The Tamil Nadu NEET exemption bill, Kerala’s Online Gaming Regulation Bill and Manipur bills during the ethnic conflict. State of Punjab v. Principal Secretary to Governor (2023) held that Governors cannot indefinitely withhold assent.

Administrative Relations: Articles 256 to 263

Article 256 obliges states to ensure compliance with Central laws, so state executive power cannot impede Parliament’s legislation. This was the constitutional logic behind the Centre’s position when Punjab passed counter-legislation to the farm laws in 2020.

Article 257 prevents state executive power from impeding Union executive power, and lets the Centre give directions in specified matters.

Article 263 provides for an Inter-State Council to inquire into and advise on inter-state disputes and matters of common interest. It is the principal constitutional forum for cooperation, and its irregular convening is a standing criticism.

The Pattern in the Design

Count the tilts in the table and the direction is unmistakable: two cooperative provisions against eight Centre-biased ones.

This was deliberate. The Constituent Assembly framed the document amid Partition and the integration of princely states, and the framers weighted the design towards holding the union together. Ambedkar’s own defence was that the Constitution could be federal in normal times and unitary when circumstances required.

The consequence is that Indian federalism depends on convention and restraint rather than on structural guarantees. Article 253 permits the Centre to legislate on any State List subject by signing a treaty. Article 249 permits it with a Rajya Sabha resolution. Article 201 permits indefinite delay of a state bill, at least until the Supreme Court said otherwise in 2023.

None of these has been used to its full constitutional extent. That restraint, and not the text, is what makes the system work as a federation.

The Way Forward

• Convene the Inter-State Council regularly, as the Constitution contemplates, rather than episodically.
• Prescribe timelines under Articles 200 and 201, giving statutory form to the 2023 judgment.
• Use Article 252 more, since states inviting Parliament to legislate is the cooperative route the framers provided and it is barely used.
• Restrain the treaty route. Article 253 should not become the standard workaround for State List subjects.
• Codify consultation on Concurrent List legislation, so that repugnancy disputes are prevented rather than litigated.

The architecture is unitary in its bones and federal in its practice. That gap is where the entire Centre-state relationship is negotiated, and it is why constitutional convention matters more in India than the text alone suggests.

Frequently Asked Questions

Practice Questions

Prelims MCQs

1. Residuary powers under the Indian Constitution vest with
   (a) The states
   (b) Parliament
   (c) The Concurrent List
   (d) The Supreme Court
   Answer: (b) Article 248 vests residuary powers exclusively with Parliament, unlike the United States or Australia.
2. Article 246A, inserted by the 101st Amendment, relates to
   (a) Emergency powers
   (b) Goods and Services Tax
   (c) Inter-state trade
   (d) Residuary powers
   Answer: (b) It created the first concurrent taxation power, operationalised through the GST Council under Article 279A.
3. The Transplantation of Human Organs Act 1994 was enacted under
   (a) Article 249
   (b) Article 250
   (c) Article 252
   (d) Article 253
   Answer: (c) Article 252 allows Parliament to legislate on a State List subject at the request of two or more states.
4. The Wildlife Protection Act 1972 was enacted under which power?
   (a) Article 249
   (b) Article 252
   (c) Article 253
   (d) Article 254
   Answer: (c) Article 253 permits legislation to implement international agreements, in this case CITES obligations.
5. In State of Punjab v. Principal Secretary to Governor (2023) the Supreme Court held that Governors
   (a) Must assent to every bill
   (b) Cannot indefinitely withhold assent
   (c) May reserve any bill without reasons
   (d) Have absolute veto over money bills
   Answer: (b) The judgment addressed indefinite delay in granting or withholding assent under Articles 200 and 201.

Mains Questions

1. The constitutional architecture of Indian federalism carries a systematic unitary tilt. Examine with reference to the distribution of legislative powers. (250 words)
2. Compare the cooperative and Centre-biased provisions in Articles 249 to 254 and assess their use in practice. (250 words)
3. Articles 200 and 201 have become flashpoints in Centre-state relations. Discuss with recent examples. (250 words)
4. Residuary powers with the Union is the sharpest indicator of India's quasi-federal character. Critically evaluate. (150 words)
5. Evaluate the Inter-State Council under Article 263 as an instrument of cooperative federalism. (150 words)

PDF