UPSC CSE 2026 Essay Paper Discussion
GS Paper 2 10 marks · 150w 9 min Medium

A number of outside powers have entrenched themselves in Central Asia, which is a zone of interest to India. Discuss the implications, in this context, of India’s joining the Ashgabat Agreement, 2018.

Subtopic: International Relations · Central Asia and connectivity

Model answer outline

How to structure your answer

Introduction (outside powers entrenched in Central Asia; India's access problem) → what the Ashgabat Agreement is → implications: Pakistan bypass, INSTC-Chabahar synergy, energy access, balancing China → caveats: Iran sanctions, slow build-out → Conclusion
Full model answer

Detailed model answer

198 words · target 150 words · 9 min

Introduction

Energy-rich Central Asia hosts entrenched outside powers — Russia (CSTO, Eurasian Economic Union), China (BRI, the region's largest trade and investment partner), Turkey and Iran — while India, denied land transit by Pakistan, has lacked physical access to a region it calls its extended neighbourhood. Joining the Ashgabat Agreement in February 2018 addresses precisely this gap.

The Agreement

Signed in 2011 by Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Iran and Oman (Kazakhstan and Pakistan acceded later), it establishes an international multimodal transport and transit corridor linking Central Asia with the Persian Gulf.

Implications for India

  • Bypasses Pakistan: access to Central Asia via Iranian ports, complementing Chabahar and the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC).
  • Energy security: opens routes toward Kazakh uranium, Turkmen gas (TAPI) and regional hydrocarbons.
  • Strategic balancing: offers Central Asian republics an alternative to Chinese-financed connectivity, reinforcing the Connect Central Asia policy (2012), India's SCO membership and the India-Central Asia Summit process (2022).
  • Trade facilitation: harmonised transit and customs procedures can cut the cost and time of India-Eurasia commerce.

Caveats

  • US sanctions on Iran, thin infrastructure and the slow operationalisation of INSTC limit immediate gains.

Conclusion

Ashgabat membership converts India's Central Asia policy from aspiration to infrastructure; the dividend depends on de-risking the Iran route and sustained investment in the corridor.

Key points

What an examiner expects to see

  • Central Asia's entrenched outside powers: Russia (CSTO, EAEU), China (BRI, largest trade-investment partner), Turkey, Iran — while Pakistan denies India land transit
  • Ashgabat Agreement (2011): multimodal transport-transit corridor linking Central Asia with the Persian Gulf; founders Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Iran, Oman; India joined February 2018
  • Core implication: a Pakistan-bypass route to Central Asia through Iranian ports, in synergy with Chabahar and INSTC
  • Energy dimension: improved access toward Kazakh uranium, Turkmen gas (TAPI) and regional hydrocarbons
  • Strategic balancing: gives Central Asian states a non-Chinese connectivity option; strengthens Connect Central Asia policy, SCO engagement and the India-Central Asia Summit
  • Constraints: US sanctions on Iran, weak infrastructure, slow INSTC operationalisation
Examples to use

Concrete cases, schemes and judgments

  • India's accession to the Ashgabat Agreement, February 2018
  • Chabahar port and the International North-South Transport Corridor as complementary routes
  • TAPI (Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India) gas pipeline project
  • Connect Central Asia policy (2012) and the first India-Central Asia Summit (2022)
Keywords / terms

Terminology to weave into the answer

Ashgabat Agreementmultimodal transit corridorINSTCChabaharConnect Central AsiaEurasian connectivity

Share this answer