UPSC CSE 2026 Essay Paper Discussion
GS Paper 2 10 marks · 150w 9 min Easy

ASEAN centrality remains a core principle of India’s Indo-Pacific Initiative, but the ASEAN-India Trade in Goods Agreement (2010) is widely seen as a one-way arrangement. Examine the case for and against an AITIGA review.

Subtopic: IR · Bilateral, regional and global groupings

Model answer outline

How to structure your answer

Introduction: ASEAN-India trade grew from $73 billion (2017-18) to $122 billion (2023-24), but India's trade deficit with ASEAN ballooned to $44 billion, leading to a formal AITIGA review launched in May 2023.

Body: Three dimensions — (i) Strategic value: India's Act East Policy (2014), ASEAN-India Strategic Partnership (2022), Look East to Act East shift; (ii) AITIGA gaps: rules of origin laxity led to Chinese goods routing through ASEAN under preferential tariffs; non-tariff barriers in agriculture; services and investment chapter excluded; (iii) Indo-Pacific framing: ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific (AOIP 2019) overlap with India's IPOI's 7 pillars.

Way forward / Conclusion: Conclude the AITIGA review with strict rules of origin, add services-investment chapter, link to RCEP-substitute supply chains under IPEF, and operationalise Trilateral Highway India-Myanmar-Thailand.

Full model answer

Written within the word limit

142 words · target 150 words · 9 min

Introduction: ASEAN-India trade grew from $73 billion (2017-18) to $122 billion (2023-24), but India's trade deficit with ASEAN ballooned to $44 billion, leading to a formal AITIGA review launched in May 2023 under the Act East framework.

Body: Three dimensions weigh the case for review. First, strategic value — the Act East Policy (2014), the ASEAN-India Strategic Partnership (2022) and the Look East-to-Act East shift make ASEAN central to India's Indo-Pacific Initiative (IPOI 2019). Second, AITIGA gaps — laxity in rules of origin lets Chinese goods route through ASEAN at preferential tariffs; non-tariff barriers obstruct Indian agricultural exports; the services and investment chapter is excluded. Third, Indo-Pacific framing — the ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific (2019) and India's IPOI seven pillars overlap on maritime ecology, connectivity and capacity-building.

Conclusion: Conclude the AITIGA review with strict rules of origin, add a services-investment chapter, link to IPEF supply chains and operationalise the India-Myanmar-Thailand Trilateral Highway.

Key points

What an examiner expects to see

  • ASEAN-India FTA (AITIGA) signed 2009, in force January 2010
  • Trade grew to $122 billion (2023-24); deficit $44 billion
  • AITIGA review formally launched May 2023; ninth round in May 2025
  • Indo-Pacific Oceans Initiative (IPOI) launched November 2019, 7 pillars
  • ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific (AOIP) adopted June 2019
  • Act East Policy (2014) replaced Look East Policy
  • ASEAN-India Strategic Partnership upgraded to Comprehensive Strategic Partnership (2022)
Examples to use

Concrete cases, schemes and judgments

  • ASEAN-India FTA (AITIGA) 2009
  • Act East Policy (2014)
  • Indo-Pacific Oceans Initiative (2019)
  • India-ASEAN Comprehensive Strategic Partnership (2022)
  • ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific (2019)
Keywords / terms

Terminology to weave into the answer

ASEANAITIGAAct Eastrules of originIPOIAOIPTrilateral HighwayComprehensive Strategic Partnership
Sources to read

Primary sources and verified references

ASEAN and India — Anantam IAS https://anantamias.com/asean-india/ ASEAN Countries — Anantam IAS https://anantamias.com/asean-countries/ MEA — ASEAN India https://www.mea.gov.in/asean-india.htm

Share this answer