Describe various measures taken in India for Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) before and after signing the ‘Sendai Framework for DRR (2015–2030).’ How is this framework different from the ‘Hyogo Framework for Action, 2005’?
Subtopic: Disaster Management · DRR frameworks & institutional reform
How to structure your answer
Introduction: Define Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) and place the Sendai Framework as the successor to the Hyogo Framework for Action.
Body: (1) India's DRR measures before Sendai; (2) Measures after signing Sendai; (3) Key differences between Sendai and Hyogo — risk vs loss, measurable targets, hazard scope, recovery.
Conclusion: Note India's alignment and the road ahead on local-level implementation.
Written within the word limit
241 words · target 250 words · 11 min
Introduction: Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) means cutting the chances and the damage of disasters by acting on the hazard, exposure and vulnerability. The Sendai Framework (2015–30) succeeded the Hyogo Framework for Action (2005–15) as the global blueprint, and India is a signatory to both.
Measures before Sendai: India moved from relief to risk management with the Disaster Management Act, 2005, creating a three-tier structure of NDMA, SDMAs and DDMAs. The National Disaster Response Force (NDRF) was raised as a dedicated multi-hazard force, the National Institute of Disaster Management (NIDM) was set up for training and research, and a National Cyclone Risk Mitigation Project was begun for coastal states.
Measures after Sendai:
- The National Disaster Management Plan, 2016 (revised 2019) was among the world's first to be aligned with Sendai's four priorities and seven targets.
- India launched the global Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure (CDRI) in 2019.
- A Prime Minister's 10-point agenda on DRR, risk-financing through SDRF/NDRF, and Finance Commission mitigation funds followed.
Sendai vs Hyogo: Hyogo aimed to reduce disaster losses; Sendai targets the risk itself — a shift from reactive to preventive. Sendai adds seven measurable global targets and 38 indicators, widens scope to natural, man-made, technological and biological hazards, places the primary responsibility on the State while engaging all of society, and stresses “Build Back Better” in recovery.
Conclusion: India's policy architecture is well-aligned with Sendai; the remaining task is sharpening district and ward-level risk governance and risk-informed investment so prevention reaches the most exposed communities.
What an examiner expects to see
- DRR addresses hazard, exposure and vulnerability to reduce disaster losses
- Disaster Management Act, 2005 created NDMA, SDMAs, DDMAs — pre-Sendai institutional base
- National Disaster Response Force (NDRF) and National Institute of Disaster Management (NIDM) set up before Sendai
- National Disaster Management Plan 2016 (revised 2019) aligned with Sendai's four priorities
- Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure (CDRI) launched by India in 2019, headquartered in New Delhi
- Sendai's four priorities: understanding risk, risk governance, investing in resilience, preparedness & Build Back Better
- Sendai's seven global targets and 38 indicators make progress measurable; Hyogo had five priorities of action but no quantified global targets
- Sendai shifts focus from reducing disaster LOSS (Hyogo) to reducing disaster RISK
- Sendai widens hazard scope to natural, man-made, technological and biological hazards
Concrete cases, schemes and judgments
- Disaster Management Act, 2005 (NDMA/SDMA/DDMA structure)
- National Disaster Management Plan 2016 (revised 2019)
- Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure (CDRI), 2019
- Prime Minister's 10-point agenda on DRR (2016 AMCDRR, New Delhi)
- National Institute of Disaster Management (NIDM)