E-governance is not only about utilization of the power of new technology, but also much about critical importance of the ‘use value’ of information. Explain.
Subtopic: Governance · e-governance and citizen-centric information
How to structure your answer
Detailed model answer
202 words · target 150 words · 9 min
E-governance is often reduced to the computerisation of government processes. The Second ARC, however, saw it as SMART government — simple, moral, accountable, responsive and transparent — in which technology is only the carrier. The real test is whether the information delivered has 'use value': whether it is relevant, comprehensible and actionable for the citizen it is meant to serve.
Power of new technology
- Platforms such as UMANG, DigiLocker and e-Office digitise access and cut transaction costs.
- Direct Benefit Transfer plugs leakages, while dashboards like PRAGATI enable real-time monitoring of projects and grievances.
Why the 'use value' of information is critical
- Relevance: eNAM mandi prices or localised agro-advisories help a farmer decide; static PDFs of circulars do not.
- Accessibility: local-language, voice and SMS formats bridge the digital divide that portals alone cannot.
- Actionability: proactive disclosure under Section 4 of the RTI Act and Rajasthan's Jan Soochna Portal convert raw data into claimable entitlements.
- Timeliness and trust: outdated or opaque websites breed disuse, however sophisticated the underlying technology.
Technology supplies the pipeline; use value supplies the purpose. E-governance succeeds only when the right information reaches the right person, in the right form and at the right time, enabling informed action — the shift from government-centric computerisation to citizen-centric governance.
What an examiner expects to see
- Second ARC's SMART governance frame: technology is the means; simple, moral, accountable, responsive, transparent government is the end.
- Digitisation without simplification merely moves queues online; information must be relevant, comprehensible and actionable to carry use value.
- Use value depends on access design — local languages, voice and SMS formats that bridge the digital divide.
- Section 4 RTI proactive disclosure and Rajasthan's Jan Soochna Portal show information becoming a claimable entitlement.
- DBT and PRAGATI demonstrate technology's power; eNAM price discovery demonstrates use value — both together complete e-governance.
- The success metric shifts from portals launched to decisions enabled and entitlements actually claimed by citizens.
Concrete cases, schemes and judgments
- Jan Soochna Portal, Rajasthan — scheme-wise proactive disclosure
- eNAM mandi price discovery for farmers
- UMANG and DigiLocker as unified access platforms
- PRAGATI platform for real-time project monitoring
- Section 4, RTI Act 2005 — suo motu disclosure obligation