GS Paper 2 12.5 marks · 200w 14 min Medium
In the integrity index of Transparency International, India stands very low. Discuss briefly the legal, political, economic, social and cultural factors that have caused the decline of public morality in India.
Subtopic: Governance · transparency, integrity and public morality
How to structure your answer
Introduction: India's standing on Transparency International's index → Legal factors → Political factors → Economic factors → Social and cultural factors → Conclusion: rebuilding the integrity chain
Written within the word limit
219 words · target 200 words · 14 min
India scored 38, ranking 96 out of 180 countries, in Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index 2024 — persistent evidence that public morality, the shared norm of honesty in public life, remains under strain.
Factors behind the decline
- Legal: weak and delayed enforcement — low conviction rates, corruption trials stretching over years, a Lokpal operational only since 2019, and prior-sanction requirements under the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018 that can shield wrongdoing, while whistle-blower protection remains weakly enforced.
- Political: criminalisation of politics — ADR reported that 46% of Lok Sabha MPs elected in 2024 declared criminal cases; opaque election funding, with the electoral bonds scheme struck down by the Supreme Court in 2024; patronage-based appointments and transfers.
- Economic: discretionary state control over land, minerals and contracts; a large informal cash economy; black money and crony intermediation that raise the returns to corruption.
- Social: corruption normalised as 'the system'; social status measured by wealth rather than the means of acquiring it; weakening community sanction against the corrupt.
- Cultural: the gift-giving tradition shading into bribery; erosion of value-based education; celebration of shortcuts and jugaad over rule-abiding conduct.
Reversing the decline needs the whole integrity chain to work together: time-bound trials and empowered Lokpal and Lokayuktas, transparent political finance, reduced discretion through DBT, GeM and faceless assessments, citizen vigilance through RTI and social audit, and ethics education that restores the dignity of honest public service.
What an examiner expects to see
- India scored 38 and ranked 96 of 180 in the Corruption Perceptions Index 2024 — perception of public-sector integrity has stagnated.
- Legal factors: low conviction rates, years-long trials, a Lokpal functional only since 2019, and prior-sanction protections under the PC (Amendment) Act, 2018.
- Political factors: 46% of Lok Sabha MPs elected in 2024 declared criminal cases (ADR); opaque funding — electoral bonds struck down by the Supreme Court in 2024.
- Economic factors: discretionary control over land, minerals and contracts; large informal cash economy; crony intermediation raising the returns to corruption.
- Social factors: normalisation of bribery as 'the system'; status linked to wealth rather than means; eroding community sanction.
- Cultural factors: gift culture shading into bribery; decline of value education; glorification of shortcuts.
- Remedies: fast-track trials, transparent political finance, discretion-reducing platforms (DBT, GeM, faceless assessment), RTI-social audit vigilance, ethics education.
Concrete cases, schemes and judgments
- Corruption Perceptions Index 2024: India at 38 points, rank 96 of 180
- ADR analysis of the 2024 Lok Sabha: 46% of MPs with declared criminal cases
- Supreme Court striking down the electoral bonds scheme (2024)
- Lokpal appointed only in 2019, six years after the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013
- GeM portal and faceless tax assessment as discretion-reducing reforms
Terminology to weave into the answer
Corruption Perceptions Indexpublic moralitycriminalisation of politicselectoral fundingLokpalintegrity