UPSC CSE 2026 Essay Paper Discussion
GS Paper 3 15 marks · 250w 14 min Medium

The Biological Diversity (Amendment) Act 2023 reshapes India’s Access and Benefit Sharing regime aligned with the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. Discuss the changes and their impact on traditional knowledge.

Subtopic: Environment · Biodiversity

Model answer outline

How to structure your answer

Introduction: Biological Diversity (Amendment) Act 2023 enacted August 2023; CBD COP15 adopted Kunming-Montreal GBF on 19 December 2022 with 23 targets including the 30×30 conservation target.

Body: 1) Key amendments — exempts codified traditional knowledge from prior NBA approval; AYUSH practitioners exemption; decriminalisation with monetary penalties. 2) Concerns — dilutes consent of Biodiversity Management Committees (BMCs); risk to ABS revenue. 3) GBF alignment — National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (updated 2024) targets 30×30, restoration of 30% degraded ecosystems.

Way forward: Strengthen BMC role under amended Rules 2024; codify benefit-sharing percentages; align CITES enforcement; Cali Fund participation post-CBD COP16.

Full model answer

Written within the word limit

222 words · target 250 words · 14 min

Introduction:

The Biological Diversity (Amendment) Act 2023 was enacted in August 2023; the CBD COP15 (Montreal) adopted the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework on 19 December 2022 with 23 targets — including the 30×30 conservation target. India's National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan was updated in 2024 to align with the GBF.

Key amendments:

The 2023 Act exempts codified traditional knowledge and AYUSH practitioners using Indian biological resources from prior National Biodiversity Authority approval. It decriminalises offences with monetary penalties of ₹1-50 lakh and rationalises benefit-sharing categories. The Divya Pharmacy (Uttarakhand High Court, 2018) case had earlier upheld AYUSH manufacturer obligations.

Impact on traditional knowledge:

By widening exemptions, the amendment is feared to dilute the consent role of Biodiversity Management Committees and reduce ABS revenue for communities maintaining People's Biodiversity Registers. Critics flag erosion of FPIC standards under the Nagoya Protocol 2010, with the Gadgil-Kasturirangan Western Ghats reports cited as benchmarks.

GBF alignment:

NBSAP (2024) targets 30% of terrestrial, inland water, coastal and marine area under effective conservation by 2030, restoration of 30% of degraded ecosystems, and equitable benefit sharing. CBD COP16 (Cali, October 2024) operationalised the Cali Fund on Digital Sequence Information for community returns from genetic data.

Way forward / Conclusion:

Strengthen the BMC role under amended Rules 2024, codify benefit-sharing percentages by sector, align CITES enforcement with the Wildlife Protection Amendment 2022, build on neem-patent and Divya Pharmacy precedents, and channel Cali Fund flows to communities under MoEFCC by 2027.

Key points

What an examiner expects to see

  • Biological Diversity Amendment Act 2023 enacted Aug 2023
  • Kunming-Montreal GBF adopted 19 December 2022
  • 23 GBF targets including 30×30 by 2030
  • AYUSH manufacturers and codified TK exempted from NBA approval
  • Decriminalisation — penalty Rs 1-50 lakh
  • NBSAP updated 2024
  • CBD COP16 Cali Fund on digital sequence information (Oct 2024)
  • People's Biodiversity Registers via BMCs
Examples to use

Concrete cases, schemes and judgments

  • Divya Pharmacy case (Uttarakhand HC, 2018)
  • Neem patent revocation EPO 2005
  • Western Ghats Gadgil-Kasturirangan reports
Keywords / terms

Terminology to weave into the answer

BDA 2023GBF30x30NBABMCABSCBD COP16DSI
Sources to read

Primary sources and verified references

MoEFCC — Biological Diversity Act notifications https://moef.gov.in/ Anantam IAS — Biodiversity Act 2002 https://anantamias.com/biodiversity-act-2002/ Anantam IAS — Convention on Biological Diversity https://anantamias.com/convention-on-biological-diversity-cbd/

Share this answer