GS Paper 2 12.5 marks · 200w 14 min Medium
“The Indian party system is passing through a phase of transition which looks to be full of contradictions and paradoxes.” Discuss.
Subtopic: Constitution & Polity · party system & electoral politics
How to structure your answer
Introduction: phases of the Indian party system → transition underway: from coalition era back to single-party dominance → contradictions: centralisation vs regional assertion, ideological convergence vs identity polarisation → paradoxes: mass democracy vs dynastic and money politics, anti-defection law vs engineered defections → Conclusion
Detailed model answer
234 words · target 200 words · 14 min
Introduction
India's party system has moved through distinct phases — the one-party dominance of the Congress system described by Rajni Kothari, fragmentation and coalition politics after 1989, and since 2014 a return to single-party majority amid what scholars call a second dominant-party system. The current transition is indeed layered with contradictions.
Contradictions and paradoxes of the transition
- National dominance versus federal assertion: one party dominates national elections, yet strong regional parties retain power in major states, producing sharply different national and state verdicts.
- Ideological convergence versus polarisation: parties broadly agree on economic reform and welfare delivery, yet compete through intense identity-based mobilisation.
- Democratisation versus dynasty: parties mobilise ever-wider social groups, but inner-party democracy is weak and leadership is frequently hereditary.
- Clean-politics rhetoric versus criminalisation: nearly half of recent Lok Sabha members face criminal cases as per ADR, despite Supreme Court-mandated disclosure norms.
- Anti-defection law versus engineered defections: the Tenth Schedule exists, yet wholesale defections and resort politics topple governments.
- Cadre parties versus electoral machines: ideology-driven organisation is giving way to professionalised, high-spending campaign machinery with opaque funding, as the striking down of electoral bonds in 2024 underlined.
- Centralising politics versus federal bargaining: pushes for simultaneous elections coexist with states demanding greater fiscal and political space.
Conclusion
These contradictions reflect a democracy that is socially deepening while institutionally hollowing. Reforms in party funding transparency, inner-party democracy and a strengthened anti-defection regime are essential for the transition to mature into accountable multiparty competition.
What an examiner expects to see
- Frame the transition: Congress system (Rajni Kothari) → post-1989 coalition/fragmentation era → post-2014 single-party majority with BJP dominance, often termed a second dominant-party system.
- Contradiction 1 — national dominance coexists with powerful regional parties ruling large states, producing split verdicts across levels.
- Contradiction 2 — broad ideological convergence on economics and welfarism alongside sharpened identity-based polarisation.
- Paradox — parties widen democratic participation yet remain internally undemocratic and dynastic.
- Paradox — anti-defection law (Tenth Schedule) exists while engineered defections and resort politics flourish.
- Criminalisation and money power persist: ADR reports about 46% of Lok Sabha MPs elected in 2024 declared criminal cases; electoral bonds were struck down in 2024 for opacity.
- Way forward: transparent political funding, regulation of inner-party elections, stricter and time-bound Speaker decisions on defection.
Concrete cases, schemes and judgments
- Rajni Kothari's 'Congress system' framework for one-party dominance
- ADR analysis: about 46% of MPs elected to the 18th Lok Sabha (2024) declared criminal cases
- SC striking down the Electoral Bond Scheme in Association for Democratic Reforms v Union of India (2024)
- Defection-driven government changes in Karnataka (2019), Madhya Pradesh (2020) and Maharashtra (2022)
- Regional party dominance in states — DMK in Tamil Nadu, TMC in West Bengal — despite national-level single-party dominance
Terminology to weave into the answer
dominant-party systemcoalition eracriminalisation of politicsinner-party democracyTenth Scheduleelectoral funding transparency