UPSC CSE 2026 Essay Paper Discussion
GS Paper 4 10 marks · 150w 9 min Medium

‘Ethics is not merely the study of what is good; it is the discipline of choosing between competing goods.’ Examine this proposition with reference to a District Magistrate’s decision on lockdown enforcement during a religious festival.

Subtopic: Section A · Ethics and Human Interface · Essence of ethics

Model answer outline

How to structure your answer

Define: ethics as a discipline of practical reason — choosing among competing goods, not between good and evil.

Illustrate: DM weighing public-health, religious freedom (Article 25), economic livelihood and law-and-order during a Kumbh-like gathering.

Apply: Aristotle's phronesis, Ross's prima facie duties, principle of double effect.

Conclude: ethical maturity is the capacity to reason transparently when goods conflict.

Full model answer

Written within the word limit

145 words · target 150 words · 9 min

Definition: Ethics, in Isaiah Berlin's reading, is the discipline of reasoned choice between incommensurable goods — liberty against equality, mercy against justice, public health against livelihood — and not merely the affirmation of right over wrong.

Illustration: A District Magistrate during a COVID-19 lockdown weighs two competing goods: epidemiological containment that saves lives, and the livelihoods of daily-wage migrants who face starvation in transit camps. Kerala's K.K. Shailaja approached this through tiered restrictions and community kitchens; in Mumbai, the BMC's Iqbal Chahal balanced ward-level micro-containment with food-relief convoys to slum clusters. Strict enforcement without livelihood protection violates Article 21; total relaxation collapses health infrastructure. Aristotelian phronesis prescribes the deliberate mean — context-sensitive enforcement, transparent reasoning and revision as evidence accumulates — rather than rule-bound abdication.

Application: The 2nd ARC's Ethics in Governance Report frames public administration as 'competing-goods management' — codifying transparency in trade-offs as the antidote to authoritarian shortcuts.

Key points

What an examiner expects to see

  • Ethics as critical reflection on conduct, not codification (Defining Ethics, anantamias)
  • Right vs right dilemmas: short-term vs long-term, individual vs community (Kidder)
  • W.D. Ross — prima facie duties: beneficence, non-maleficence, fidelity
  • Article 25 (freedom of religion) vs Article 21 (right to life) — Sabarimala-style conflict
  • Disaster Management Act 2005 Section 30 — DM's plenary powers
  • Procedural transparency converts a hard choice into a defensible decision
Examples to use

Concrete cases, schemes and judgments

  • Mumbai BMC restricting Ganesh Chaturthi immersion processions during COVID-19, 2020-21
  • Haridwar Kumbh 2021 attendance protocols
  • Bakr-Eid live-stock movement curbs during avian-influenza outbreaks
Keywords / terms

Terminology to weave into the answer

competing goodsphronesisprima facie dutiesdouble effectdiscretionArticle 25public healthethical reasoning
Sources to read

Primary sources and verified references

Defining Ethics — anantamias https://anantamias.com/defining-ethics/ Ethical Dilemma — anantamias https://anantamias.com/ethical-dilemma/ Framework to Resolve Ethical Dilemma — anantamias https://anantamias.com/framework-to-resolve-ethical-dilemma-and-conflict-of-interest/ 2nd ARC Report on Ethics in Governance https://darpg.gov.in/sites/default/files/ethics4.pdf

Share this answer