Why in News

In February 2026, the Union Ministry of Home Affairs released India’s first comprehensive counter-terror doctrine titled PRAHAAR. It lays down a National Counter Terrorism Policy and Strategy framework to address evolving security threats.

UPSC Relevance:

GS III – Internal Security, Counter Terrorism

CONTEXT

India has faced multiple forms of terrorism over the decades:

• Cross-border sponsored terrorism.
• Radicalisation and sleeper cell networks.
• Left Wing Extremism.
• Technology-enabled and cyber-driven attacks.

After the weakening of traditional terror networks, the threat has shifted towards hybrid, decentralised and technology-intensive models. The policy recognises this transformation.

GUIDING PRINCIPLES OF PRAHAAR

1. Terrorism Not Linked to Religion or Ethnicity

The policy clearly states that terrorism is not associated with any particular religion, nationality or civilisation. This ensures alignment with constitutional values of secularism and equality.

2. Zero Tolerance Approach

All terrorist acts, financing channels, support systems and safe havens are to be criminalised and dismantled.

3. Whole-of-Government and Whole-of-Society Approach

Counter-terror efforts involve central agencies, state police, intelligence bodies, financial regulators, community leaders and civil society organisations.

NATURE OF THREATS IDENTIFIED

1. Cross-Border Sponsored Terrorism

The policy acknowledges sustained attempts by handlers operating from across India’s borders to recruit, finance and guide attacks through local modules.
Modern tools such as drones and encrypted communications are increasingly being used to smuggle arms and coordinate attacks.

2. Global Terror Networks

India remains a target of international terror organisations such as:

• Al-Qaeda
• Islamic State (ISIS)

These organisations attempt to radicalise individuals through online propaganda, sleeper cells and transnational ideological networks.

3. Cyber Terrorism and Digital Threats

Terrorist actors and hostile nation-states are increasingly targeting India’s digital infrastructure.
Cyber-attacks aim to disrupt essential services such as power grids, railways, aviation, banking and defence systems.
Digital anonymity through encryption, dark web platforms and cryptocurrency wallets makes detection and attribution difficult.

4. Critical Infrastructure Threats

India faces threats across:

• Land: Infiltration, insurgency and sleeper cells.
• Water: Attacks on ports, shipping routes and maritime infrastructure.
• Air: Aviation sabotage and drone-based weapon delivery.

The policy emphasises protection of strategic sectors including defence, space and atomic energy installations.

5. CBRNED Risks

CBRNED refers to threats involving:

• Chemical agents
• Biological agents
• Radiological materials
• Nuclear substances
• Explosives
• Digital sabotage

The misuse of these materials by state or non-state actors could cause mass casualties and long-term disruption.

TECHNOLOGY AND HYBRID WARFARE

The policy recognises that terrorism is no longer confined to physical violence. It now includes:

• Use of drones for arms supply and reconnaissance.
• Social media platforms for recruitment and propaganda.
• Instant messaging apps with strong encryption for operational planning.
• Organised criminal networks for logistics and funding.

This indicates convergence between terrorism, organised crime and cyber warfare.

INSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL MECHANISMS

1. Role of Investigative Agencies

The National Investigation Agency (NIA) plays a central coordinating role in terrorism-related investigations.
After major incidents, coordination meetings with state anti-terror units are conducted to standardise responses.

2. Uniform Anti-Terror Structure Across States

The policy proposes standardised procedures and coordination mechanisms so that responses to terror threats are consistent across states.
This reduces jurisdictional delays and ensures synergy between agencies.

3. Strengthening Prosecution

Legal experts are to be associated from the FIR stage itself.
Early legal scrutiny ensures that evidence collection and documentation are strong enough to sustain convictions in court.

DERADICALISATION AND PREVENTIVE STRATEGY

1. Graded Response to Radicalisation

Individuals identified as vulnerable to extremist ideologies undergo monitoring, counselling or legal action depending on the severity of radicalisation.

2. Community Engagement

Moderate religious leaders, NGOs and community elders are engaged to counter extremist narratives and promote peaceful discourse.

3. Youth Engagement

Youth are constructively engaged through educational and social initiatives to prevent alienation and vulnerability to recruitment.

4. Prison De-radicalisation

Prison authorities are instructed to prevent hardened extremists from influencing vulnerable inmates.
Structured de-radicalisation programmes are implemented within correctional institutions.

INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION

Terrorism is transnational in nature. The policy emphasises:

• Intelligence sharing with friendly nations.
• Financial tracking to prevent terror financing.
• Regional and multilateral cooperation to curb safe havens abroad.

National action is considered effective only when complemented by international coordination.

LINKAGES WITH EXISTING LEGAL FRAMEWORK

PRAHAAR operates alongside:

• Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA)
• NIA Act
• Information Technology Act
• National Policy on Left Wing Extremism (2015)

The new policy provides strategic coherence to these scattered measures.

SIGNIFICANCE OF PRAHAAR

1. It marks a doctrinal shift from reactive response to preventive and ecosystem-based counter-terrorism.
2. It recognises the merging of cyber warfare and conventional terrorism.
3. It institutionalises coordination between Centre and States.
4. It integrates legal, social, technological and diplomatic dimensions into a unified framework.

CONCLUSION

The PRAHAAR policy represents a comprehensive evolution in India’s counter-terror strategy. By addressing cross-border terrorism, cyber threats, radicalisation and transnational networks within a unified framework, it seeks to dismantle not only terror incidents but the entire ecosystem that sustains them. Its long-term success will depend on institutional coordination, technological preparedness, legal robustness and sustained community engagement.

Practice Question

1. Terrorism in India has evolved from cross-border infiltration to hybrid and digital threats.”
   In this context, analyze how PRAHAAR addresses emerging dimensions of terrorism.
2. Discuss the challenges in implementing a centralized anti-terror framework in a federal polity like India. How can PRAHAAR overcome these constraints?

PDF