Opens in a new tab
Join Anantam IAS Channel on Telegram

GS 2 · Practice archive

GS Paper 2 practice questions for UPSC Mains 2026.

Polity, Constitution, Governance, Social Justice and International Relations.

20 Qs / 250 marks426 questionsModel outlines included

GS Paper 2 · Tips & tricks

GS-2 — anchor every claim to an article, a judgment or a body

  1. Quote the Article number first.Article 200, Article 356, Article 14 — naming the constitutional provision in the first line of the body signals competence.
  2. Pair a judgment with the principle it laid down.S.R. Bommai (federalism), Kesavananda Bharati (basic structure), Vishaka (workplace harassment) — use them as shorthand, not lectures.
  3. Use the institution's real name.Not "election body" — Election Commission of India. Not "human rights body" — National Human Rights Commission. Not "the audit body" — CAG.
  4. For Governance, cite a real scheme + a real number.PM-KISAN beneficiaries, Aadhaar coverage %, MGNREGA person-days, DBT savings — concrete metrics anchor your point.
  5. IR answers need three verbs: convergence, divergence, balance.Every bilateral relationship has all three. Show all three in the same answer.
Q.115 marks · 250w 14 min Medium

POSHAN 2.0 has shifted India’s child-nutrition architecture from food handouts to a first-1,000-days approach, yet anaemia in under-fives rose between NFHS-4 and NFHS-5. Examine the design strengths and implementation gaps of the scheme. Examine.

Subtopic: Social Justice · Welfare schemes — performance

Show model answer outline

Introduction: Mission Saksham Anganwadi and POSHAN 2.0, launched in 2021, reaches roughly 10 crore beneficiaries through 14 lakh Anganwadi Centres on a real-time Poshan Tracker, with a 2025-26 outlay of about Rs 21,960 crore.

Body: Three dimensions — (i) Design strengths: maternal nutrition, IYCF norms, community-based management of acute malnutrition (CMAM), fortified take-home rations, digital growth monitoring; (ii) Performance evidence: stunting fell from 38.4 to 35.5 percent and underweight from 35.8 to 32.1 percent between NFHS-4 and NFHS-5, but child anaemia rose from 58.6 to 67.1 percent and women's anaemia from 53 to 57 percent; (iii) Gaps: NFHS data are 2019-21 vintage, FAO SOFI 2024 records 194.6 million undernourished Indians and 18.7 percent wasting, Anganwadi worker vacancies, weak last-mile fortification supply.

Way forward / Conclusion: Centre the first 1,000 days through maternal nutrition under PMMVY, scale mandatory rice fortification with FSSAI +F standards, fix Anganwadi vacancies and integrate POSHAN with PMAY-G water and sanitation.

Key points
  • POSHAN 2.0 budget Rs 21,960 crore (BE 2025-26), 10 crore beneficiaries, 14 lakh Anganwadi Centres
  • NFHS-5 — stunting 35.5 percent, wasting 19.3 percent, underweight 32.1 percent, child anaemia 67.1 percent
  • FAO SOFI 2024 — 194.6 million undernourished Indians, child wasting 18.7 percent (highest globally), low birth weight 27.4 percent
  • First 1,000 days — UNICEF/CSEP brief notes about half of growth failure by age two happens in the womb
  • Anemia Mukt Bharat, fortified rice under PDS, Mid-Day Meal/PM-POSHAN as convergent levers
  • Global Hunger Index 2025 — India scored 25.8, ranked 'serious'; government disputes methodology
  • Double burden — maternal overweight/obesity rose from 20.6 percent to 33.2 percent (NFHS-4 to NFHS-5)

Open full model answer →

Q.215 marks · 250w 14 min Medium

PM-JAY Ayushman Bharat covers a 50 crore population with Rs 5 lakh secondary and tertiary hospital cover, yet out-of-pocket health expenditure remains among the highest in the world. Discuss the achievements and design limits of the scheme.

Subtopic: Social Justice · Welfare schemes — performance

Show model answer outline

Introduction: PM-JAY, launched on 23 September 2018, is the world's largest publicly funded health-assurance scheme, with Rs 5 lakh per family per year for secondary and tertiary hospitalisation and a 70-plus age-group expansion in 2024.

Body: Three dimensions — (i) Achievements: over 35 crore Ayushman cards issued, more than 8 crore hospital admissions, around 31,000 empanelled hospitals, integration with ABHA under Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission; (ii) Limits: covers only inpatient care, leaves out outpatient and medicine costs that drive about 60 percent of OOPE; private-empanelled hospitals dominate; missing trust-based vs insurance-based state variations; package-rate disputes; (iii) Equity: states like West Bengal and Delhi opted out for periods; tribal districts under-utilise; women's claim share lags.

Way forward / Conclusion: Add an outpatient and chronic-disease cover, raise the public-health spend toward the National Health Policy 2017 target of 2.5 percent of GDP, strengthen Health and Wellness Centres for primary care, and audit private hospital empanelment with WHO ICD-coded outcome data.

Key points
  • PM-JAY launched 23 September 2018; Rs 5 lakh family-floater for secondary and tertiary care
  • Covers approximately 12 crore poorest families (about 55 crore beneficiaries), 70-plus universal cover added September 2024
  • Over 8 crore hospital admissions and around 31,000 empanelled hospitals as of 2025
  • Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission — ABHA ID, Health Facility Registry, Health Professional Registry
  • Out-of-pocket expenditure still around 39.4 percent of total health spending (NHA 2021-22)
  • Public health expenditure remains around 1.84 percent of GDP, below NHP 2017 target of 2.5 percent
  • Outpatient and pharmaceutical costs largely excluded, despite driving most household health distress

Open full model answer →

Q.310 marks · 150w 9 min Easy

MGNREGA 2005 created a justiciable right to 100 days of unskilled wage work but its real wage rates and budget have stagnated in recent years. Evaluate its continuing relevance for India’s rural poor.

Subtopic: Social Justice · Welfare schemes — performance

Show model answer outline

Introduction: The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act 2005 entitles every rural household to 100 days of manual work in a financial year and stands as India's largest demand-driven safety net.

Body: Three dimensions — (i) Counter-cyclical role: enrolled work peaked at 389 crore person-days in 2020-21 during the pandemic; (ii) Issues: average wage Rs 289-300 in 2024-25, lagging state minimum wages; FY 2025-26 BE around Rs 86,000 crore against a CAG-flagged real demand of more than Rs 1.5 lakh crore; mandatory Aadhaar-Based Payment System and National Mobile Monitoring System exclusion errors; (iii) Asset creation: water-conservation works and individual-beneficiary land development under convergence with PMAY-G and JJM.

Way forward / Conclusion: Re-index wages to inflation, untie budget from cap, restore demand-driven character and pilot an urban employment guarantee.

Key points
  • MGNREGA 2005 — 100 days wage employment per rural household per year
  • FY 2025-26 BE around Rs 86,000 crore; expenditure cap rather than demand-driven in practice
  • Average wage rate in 2024-25 about Rs 289-300, often below state minimum wages
  • Mandatory ABPS and NMMS attendance flagged for exclusion errors by labour rights groups
  • 389 crore person-days generated in 2020-21 (peak pandemic year)
  • Convergence with PMAY-G, Jal Jeevan Mission, and individual-beneficiary land works
  • Urban Employment Guarantee proposal (Azim Premji University 2020) under debate

Open full model answer →

Q.415 marks · 250w 14 min Hard

PM-JANMAN and the Dharti Aaba Janjatiya Gram Utkarsh Abhiyan represent a saturation approach to tribal welfare, while the Forest Rights Act 2006 represents a rights-based approach. Critically analyse the gap between welfare and rights in tribal policy.

Subtopic: Social Justice · Welfare schemes — performance

Show model answer outline

Introduction: India's tribal architecture rests on two tracks — welfare-saturation schemes (PM-JANMAN, DAJGUA) and rights-recognition laws (FRA 2006, PESA 1996). The first delivers amenities; the second transfers ownership.

Body: Three dimensions — (i) Welfare push: PM-JANMAN (November 2023) put Rs 24,104 crore behind 75 PVTGs; DAJGUA (November 2024) added Rs 79,156 crore to saturate nearly 63,843 tribal villages with PMAY-G houses, JJM water and PMGSY roads; (ii) Rights stall: Forest Rights Act review on 1 June 2025 by MoTA found more than 18 lakh of the 51 lakh claims rejected (about 36 percent rejection); Community Forest Resource rights titled to under 5 percent of the potential area; (iii) Constitutional design: Article 244, Fifth and Sixth Schedules, PESA in 10 states, gram sabha as the FRA gatekeeper.

Way forward / Conclusion: Couple PM-JANMAN delivery with FRA title verification, end the deemed-rejection of claims without speaking orders (Niyamgiri principle), and converge MFP MSP and CFR governance under gram sabha control.

Key points
  • Scheduled Tribes — 10.42 crore, about 8.6 percent of India, 705 notified groups (Census 2011)
  • PVTGs — 75 communities across 18 states and Andaman & Nicobar
  • PM-JANMAN (November 2023) — Rs 24,104 crore for PVTG households across 11 ministries
  • DAJGUA / Dharti Aaba Janjatiya Gram Utkarsh Abhiyan (October 2024) — Rs 79,156 crore for 63,843 tribal villages
  • Forest Rights Act 2006 — IFR and CFR titles to forest-dwelling Scheduled Tribes and OTFDs
  • MoTA review (1 June 2025) — about 36 percent of 51 lakh FRA claims rejected; CFR titles cover under 5 percent of potential area
  • PESA 1996 extends self-rule to Fifth Schedule areas in 10 states; gram sabha is the FRA gatekeeper
  • Niyamgiri Suraksha Samiti v. Union of India (2013) — gram sabha consent for diversion of forest land

Open full model answer →

Q.510 marks · 150w 9 min Medium

The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act 2016 promises a 4 percent job reservation and accessible infrastructure, but the Supreme Court’s Rajive Raturi judgment held that the law’s accessibility chapter was being treated as a discretionary favour. Examine.

Subtopic: Social Justice · Mechanisms, laws and institutions for protection of vulnerable sections

Show model answer outline

Introduction: The RPwD Act 2016 is the Indian implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, ratified by India on 1 October 2007, and the Rajive Raturi v. Union of India ruling on 8 November 2024 declared accessibility a fundamental right under Article 21.

Body: Three dimensions — (i) Statutory architecture: 21 specified disabilities, social model definition, 4 percent reservation in government jobs (Section 34), 5 percent in higher education (Section 32), Chief Commissioner and State Commissioners as quasi-judicial enforcers; (ii) Implementation gap: only 8.73 percent of buses accessible per the Centre's own Rajive Raturi compliance affidavit; Sugamya Bharat Phase 1 targets missed; Census 2011 enumerates only 2.21 percent disabled against WHO's 16 percent global estimate; (iii) Compliance hearing on 11 February 2026 — the Court refused the Centre's plea to defer mandatory accessibility rules; vacancies in DEPwD and State Commissions persist.

Way forward / Conclusion: Notify enforceable accessibility rules under Section 40 with penalties, conduct a disability-inclusive Census 2027 with the Washington Group Short Set, fill commissioner vacancies and audit the 4 percent reservation backlog.

Key points
  • RPwD Act 2016 — 21 specified disabilities under Section 2(zc), social model, Schedule of conditions
  • Section 34 — 4 percent reservation in government jobs; Section 32 — 5 percent in higher education
  • UNCRPD ratified 1 October 2007; India a State Party
  • Rajive Raturi v. Union of India (8 November 2024) — accessibility a fundamental right under Article 21
  • Census 2011 — 2.21 percent disabled population, against WHO global estimate of about 16 percent
  • Sugamya Bharat Abhiyan (Accessible India Campaign) launched December 2015
  • Only 8.73 percent of buses accessible per Centre's compliance affidavit (February 2026 hearing)
  • Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities and State Commissioners are quasi-judicial under Section 75

Open full model answer →

Q.615 marks · 250w 14 min Medium

The Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Act 2013 has not eliminated hazardous cleaning deaths, with the government recording 294 sewer and septic-tank deaths between 2020 and 2024. Discuss the gaps between the law and the lived practice and the role of the NAMASTE scheme.

Subtopic: Social Justice · Mechanisms, laws and institutions for protection of vulnerable sections

Show model answer outline

Introduction: The PEMSR Act 2013 banned manual scavenging and made hazardous cleaning of sewers and septic tanks without safety gear a punishable offence, building on the 1993 prohibition.

Body: Three dimensions — (i) Statutory and judicial scaffolding: PEMSR Act 2013, Safai Karamchari Andolan v. Union of India (2014) directed Rs 10 lakh compensation per sewer death, raised to Rs 30 lakh in Balram Singh v. Union of India (October 2023); (ii) Persistent deaths: Government told Rajya Sabha 294 sewer/septic-tank deaths in 2020-2024 (with zero 'manual scavenging' deaths reported, exposing the definitional dodge); (iii) NAMASTE scheme (launched 2023, replacing SRMS) — mechanised desludging, Profiling of Sewer-Septic-Tank Workers (PWSSWs), PPE kits, capital subsidy for sanitation enterprises; convergence with Swachh Bharat 2.0.

Way forward / Conclusion: Merge 'manual scavenging' and 'hazardous cleaning' for legal accountability, criminalise non-mechanised entry, vest enforcement in Municipal Commissioners with strict liability and ensure caste-disaggregated NAMASTE data.

Key points
  • PEMSR Act 2013 covered dry latrines plus septic-tank and sewer cleaning; criminalised hazardous cleaning
  • Safai Karamchari Andolan v. Union of India (2014) — Rs 10 lakh compensation per sewer death
  • Balram Singh v. Union of India (October 2023) — compensation raised to Rs 30 lakh
  • MoSJ&E to Rajya Sabha — 294 sewer and septic-tank deaths in 2020-2024; zero 'manual scavenging' deaths reported
  • NAMASTE — National Action for Mechanised Sanitation Ecosystem (2023), supersedes SRMS
  • Identifies and rehabilitates Sewer and Septic Tank Workers (SSWs), provides PPE and ayushman cards
  • Caste profile — over 90 percent of victims from Dalit communities, per SKA tracking
  • Constitutional anchor — Article 17 (abolition of untouchability), Article 21 right to dignity

Open full model answer →

Q.710 marks · 150w 9 min Medium

India’s National Tuberculosis Elimination Programme set a 2025 elimination target, five years ahead of the SDG 3.3 deadline, yet WHO estimates India accounted for 26 percent of global TB cases in 2023. Examine the public-health design and the gaps.

Subtopic: Social Justice · Health

Show model answer outline

Introduction: The National Tuberculosis Elimination Programme (NTEP), renamed from RNTCP in 2020, pursues India's 2025 elimination target under the National Strategic Plan 2017-25.

Body: Three dimensions — (i) Architecture: Ni-kshay digital surveillance, Ni-kshay Poshan Yojana cash transfer of Rs 1,000 per month (raised in 2024) for nutritional support, free first-line and second-line drugs, BPaL/BPaLM oral regimen for MDR-TB; (ii) Burden: WHO Global TB Report 2024 — India had about 28 lakh TB cases and 3.15 lakh TB deaths in 2023, 26 percent of global incidence; MDR/RR-TB notifications around 75,000; (iii) Gaps: private-sector notification under-coverage, latent-TB infection screening only nascent, stock-outs of pediatric formulations and HIV-TB co-infection management.

Way forward / Conclusion: Universal active case finding in slums and tribal pockets, mandatory private-sector notification with conditional cash, and integration with PM-JAY for catastrophic-cost protection.

Key points
  • NTEP under National Strategic Plan 2017-25; 2025 elimination target (incidence below 1 per lakh)
  • WHO Global TB Report 2024 — India about 28 lakh cases, 3.15 lakh deaths in 2023, 26 percent of global burden
  • Ni-kshay portal for case notification; Ni-kshay Poshan Yojana DBT raised to Rs 1,000/month (November 2024)
  • BPaL/BPaLM oral regimen approved for DR-TB (2024)
  • MDR/RR-TB notifications about 75,000; AIDS-TB co-infection management under NACO-NTEP convergence
  • Pradhan Mantri TB Mukt Bharat Abhiyan (September 2022) — Ni-kshay Mitra community adoption
  • 100 Days Intensified TB Campaign launched December 2024 in 347 high-burden districts

Open full model answer →

Q.810 marks · 150w 9 min Easy

Public health spending in India hovers below 2 percent of GDP against the National Health Policy 2017 target of 2.5 percent. Examine the consequences for equity and out-of-pocket expenditure.

Subtopic: Social Justice · Health

Show model answer outline

Introduction: India's public health expenditure remains around 1.84 percent of GDP (NHA 2021-22), short of the 2.5 percent target set in the National Health Policy 2017 and the High Level Expert Group on UHC (2011) benchmark of 3 percent.

Body: Three dimensions — (i) Out-of-pocket expenditure has fallen from about 64.2 percent (FY15) to 39.4 percent (FY22) but still drives an estimated 6 crore Indians into poverty annually; (ii) State variation — Tamil Nadu and Kerala spend more than 1 percent of GSDP on health while Uttar Pradesh and Bihar spend less than 0.5 percent; (iii) Federal design — health is a State Subject (List II Entry 6); 15th Finance Commission's Health Sector Grant of Rs 70,051 crore (2021-26) routed via local bodies.

Way forward / Conclusion: Earmark a cess-funded Health Equity Fund, expand PM-ABHIM critical-care blocks and condition central transfers on primary-care strengthening.

Key points
  • Public health expenditure about 1.84 percent of GDP (NHA 2021-22) against 2.5 percent NHP 2017 target
  • Out-of-pocket expenditure 39.4 percent of total health spend (NHA 2021-22), down from 64.2 percent in FY15
  • About 6 crore Indians pushed into poverty annually by health spending (WHO-NCAER 2021)
  • 15th Finance Commission Health Sector Grant Rs 70,051 crore (2021-26) routed via PRIs and ULBs
  • PM-ABHIM Pradhan Mantri Ayushman Bharat Health Infrastructure Mission (October 2021) — Rs 64,180 crore
  • Ayushman Arogya Mandirs (renamed HWCs) as primary-care backbone
  • Health a State Subject under List II Entry 6; insurance and ESI on Concurrent List

Open full model answer →

Q.915 marks · 250w 14 min Medium

India’s eldercare architecture rests largely on the family, with the IGNOAPS pension at Rs 200 a month and no national long-term-care system. Discuss the demographic urgency and the policy steps required, with reference to NITI Aayog’s Senior Care Reforms framework.

Subtopic: Social Justice · Health

Show model answer outline

Introduction: India's population aged 60-plus will roughly double from about 10.5 percent in 2022 to 20.8 percent by 2050 per the UNFPA India Ageing Report 2023, with the elderly outnumbering children under 14 by about 2046.

Body: Three dimensions — (i) Income inadequacy: Indira Gandhi National Old Age Pension Scheme (IGNOAPS) pays Rs 200 per month (60-79) and Rs 500 (80-plus), unchanged since 2007; about 71 percent of elderly are rural and 52 percent are women (feminisation and ruralisation of ageing); (ii) Care infrastructure: National Programme for Health Care of the Elderly (NPHCE), Rashtriya Vayoshri Yojana, SAGE platform; long-term care (LTC) and dementia services almost absent; (iii) NITI Aayog Senior Care Reforms (February 2024) framework — four pillars of social, financial, health and digital inclusion, plus a national policy on Active and Healthy Ageing.

Way forward / Conclusion: Recast IGNOAPS as a non-contributory universal social pension indexed to inflation, create a National Eldercare Authority, license LTC homes, and use Atal Vayo Abhyuday Yojana for community-level care.

Key points
  • 60-plus population to double from 10.5 percent (2022) to 20.8 percent by 2050 — UNFPA 2023
  • Old-age dependency ratio rose from 10.9 (1961) to about 15.7 (2021) per NSO Elderly in India 2021
  • Indira Gandhi National Old Age Pension — Rs 200/month (60-79), Rs 500 (80-plus) since 2007
  • Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act 2007
  • National Programme for Health Care of the Elderly (NPHCE) under NHM
  • NITI Aayog 'Senior Care Reforms in India' framework (February 2024) — four pillars
  • Feminisation and ruralisation — 52 percent women, 71 percent rural elderly
  • Atal Vayo Abhyuday Yojana (AVYAY) consolidates senior-citizen schemes

Open full model answer →

Q.1010 marks · 150w 9 min Easy

The National Education Policy 2020 promises foundational literacy and numeracy by 2026-27 through the NIPUN Bharat Mission and a 6 percent of GDP spending target. Evaluate the implementation status and structural gaps.

Subtopic: Social Justice · Education

Show model answer outline

Introduction: NEP 2020, the third national policy after 1968 and 1986/1992, restructures school education into a 5+3+3+4 design and reaffirms the Kothari Commission (1964-66) target of 6 percent of GDP on education.

Body: Three dimensions — (i) Foundational stage: NIPUN Bharat (July 2021) sets FLN targets by Grade 3 by 2026-27, with PM SHRI schools (Rs 27,360 crore, 2022-27) as model laboratories; (ii) Higher education: 50 percent GER target by 2035 from current 28.4 percent (AISHE 2021-22), Academic Bank of Credits, multidisciplinary universities, and UGC autonomy reforms; (iii) Spending gap: Education spend remains around 4.6 percent of GDP combined Centre and States, well below the 6 percent target; Right to Education enforcement, teacher vacancies (over 10 lakh) and learning losses captured in ASER 2024 persist.

Way forward / Conclusion: A Central FLN Mission with state co-finance, mother-tongue early instruction under Article 350A, end ad hoc teacher recruitment and link Samagra Shiksha grants to ASER outcomes.

Key points
  • NEP 2020 — 5+3+3+4 school structure replacing 10+2
  • NIPUN Bharat Mission (5 July 2021) — FLN targets by Grade 3 by 2026-27
  • Kothari Commission (1964-66) target of 6 percent of GDP; current spend around 4.6 percent (Centre+States)
  • GER in higher education 28.4 percent (AISHE 2021-22); NEP target 50 percent by 2035
  • PM SHRI scheme (2022) — Rs 27,360 crore for 14,500 model schools till 2026-27
  • Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act 2009 — Article 21A
  • ASER 2024 — only 23.4 percent of Class 3 students in government schools can read a Class 2 text
  • Teacher vacancies — over 10 lakh sanctioned posts unfilled (Lok Sabha reply 2024)

Open full model answer →

Q.1110 marks · 150w 9 min Easy

The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act 2009 gave India a constitutional entitlement to schooling but learning outcomes have stagnated. Examine the gap between access and quality.

Subtopic: Social Justice · Education

Show model answer outline

Introduction: The 86th Constitutional Amendment (2002) inserted Article 21A making free and compulsory education for 6-14-year-olds a fundamental right, operationalised by the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act 2009.

Body: Three dimensions — (i) Access wins: gross enrolment near universal at primary, drop-out at upper-primary at 5.2 percent (UDISE 2022-23); (ii) Quality stagnation: ASER 2024 shows only 23.4 percent of Class 3 government-school students can read a Class 2 text, and 33.7 percent can do subtraction; (iii) Structural issues: no-detention policy amended in 2019, 25 percent EWS quota in private schools (Section 12(1)(c)), teacher pupil-ratio breaches in 12 states.

Way forward / Conclusion: Link Samagra Shiksha funding to learning outcomes, reintroduce mid-year diagnostic assessments under NIPUN Bharat, and end ad hoc teacher recruitment under the State PSC route.

Key points
  • Article 21A inserted by 86th Constitutional Amendment 2002; RTE Act 2009 operationalised it
  • Section 12(1)(c) — 25 percent EWS reservation in unaided private schools
  • ASER 2024 — only 23.4 percent of Class 3 government-school students can read a Class 2 text
  • Drop-out rate at upper-primary 5.2 percent (UDISE+ 2022-23)
  • No-detention policy diluted by 2019 RTE amendment, allowing detention from Class 5/8
  • Teacher vacancies over 10 lakh per Ministry of Education data
  • Samagra Shiksha (2018) consolidates SSA, RMSA and TE schemes

Open full model answer →

Q.1215 marks · 250w 14 min Hard

The Mental Healthcare Act 2017 recognised a right to access mental healthcare and decriminalised suicide attempts, yet NMHS data points to a treatment gap of 84.5 percent. Examine the institutional weaknesses behind the gap.

Subtopic: Social Justice · Mechanisms, laws and institutions for protection of vulnerable sections

Show model answer outline

Introduction: The Mental Healthcare Act 2017 made the right to mental healthcare statutory and aligned Indian law with the UNCRPD framework that India ratified in 2007.

Body: Three dimensions — (i) Rights architecture: right to access mental healthcare under Section 18, advance directives under Section 5, nominated representatives, Mental Health Review Boards, Central and State Mental Health Authorities, Section 115 decriminalising suicide attempts; (ii) Workforce and finance gap: 0.75 psychiatrists per 100,000 against WHO norm of 3; about 9,000 working psychiatrists with a shortfall of 36,000 per the 2023 Parliamentary Standing Committee on Health; mental-health allocation Rs 1,898 crore in 2025-26 (about 1 percent of Union health budget); (iii) Demand-side reality: NMHS 2015-16 — 10.56 percent current and 13.67 percent lifetime prevalence; treatment gap 84.5 percent overall; Tele-MANAS took close to 30 lakh calls since October 2022.

Way forward / Conclusion: Operationalise District Mental Health Programme with task-sharing through ASHAs and counsellors (mhGAP), publish NMHS-2 with state-level data, raise mental-health budget toward WHO's 5 percent benchmark, and integrate Tele-MANAS with ABDM.

Key points
  • Mental Healthcare Act 2017 — Section 18 right to access mental healthcare; Section 5 advance directives; Section 115 decriminalises suicide attempts
  • NMHS 2015-16 — current prevalence 10.56 percent, lifetime 13.67 percent, treatment gap 84.5 percent
  • Psychiatrist density 0.75 per 100,000 against WHO norm of 3 per 100,000; about 9,000 working psychiatrists
  • Mental health budget Rs 1,898 crore (2025-26), roughly 1 percent of Union health budget
  • Tele-MANAS (October 2022) — close to 30 lakh calls in three years, 20 languages
  • NCRB Accidental Deaths and Suicides 2022 — 1,70,924 suicides, rate 12.4 per 100,000; daily-wage workers 26 percent
  • Mental Health Review Boards under Sections 73-78 to enforce patient rights
  • District Mental Health Programme runs through NMHP; task-sharing per WHO mhGAP guidelines

Open full model answer →

Q.1310 marks · 150w 9 min Easy

China’s Belt and Road Initiative and India’s refusal to join it rest on the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor’s passage through Gilgit-Baltistan. Examine how this sovereignty position has shaped India’s connectivity diplomacy.

Subtopic: IR · India and its neighbourhood

Show model answer outline

Introduction: India boycotted the first Belt and Road Forum in 2017 over CPEC's $62 billion route through Gilgit-Baltistan and has maintained the line that activity on Indian-claimed territory is 'inherently illegal, illegitimate, and unacceptable'.

Body: Three dimensions — (i) Sovereignty rationale rooted in the Instrument of Accession 1947 and Article 1(3)(c) of the Constitution; (ii) Alternative corridors: IMEC (9 September 2023, G20 New Delhi Summit), INSTC via Chabahar (US sanctions waiver expired 26 April 2026), I2U2 (14 July 2022); (iii) BRI scale — about $1 trillion across 147 countries; India's hedge is a portfolio not a single bet.

Way forward / Conclusion: Keep the BRI boycott as principled but operationalise IMEC pilot cargoes via UAE-Israel Haifa link, formalise INSTC framework with Russia and Iran, and accelerate Trincomalee energy hub.

Key points
  • BRI launched 2013, about $1 trillion invested across 147 countries
  • CPEC about $62 billion, passes through Gilgit-Baltistan (India-claimed)
  • India boycotted Belt and Road Forums since 2017
  • Article 1(3)(c) Constitution includes territories acquired by Instrument of Accession 1947
  • IMEC announced 9 September 2023 at G20 New Delhi Summit; 8 MoU signatories
  • INSTC via Iran's Chabahar — about 30% cheaper, 40% shorter than Suez route
  • US sanctions waiver for Chabahar expired 26 April 2026

Open full model answer →

Q.1415 marks · 250w 14 min Hard

Higher education in India is moving toward a 50 percent gross enrolment ratio by 2035 under NEP 2020 but remains stratified by caste, gender, and region. Critically analyse, with reference to recent UGC and AISHE data.

Subtopic: Social Justice · Education

Show model answer outline

Introduction: India runs the world's second-largest higher-education system. NEP 2020 commits to raising the Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER) in higher education to 50 percent by 2035 against 28.4 percent in AISHE 2021-22.

Body: Three dimensions — (i) Quantitative progress: female GER 28.5 percent now exceeds male GER 28.3 percent; SC GER at 25.9 percent and ST GER at 21.2 percent below the national average; (ii) Equity gaps: PhD enrolment by SC/ST under-represented; minority enrolment uneven; M.Sukhdeo Thorat Committee (2007) on JNU exclusion still relevant; (iii) Structural reforms: 103rd Amendment EWS quota (2019), Academic Bank of Credits, multiple-entry-and-exit, four-year UG with research, and the proposed Higher Education Commission of India to replace UGC and AICTE.

Way forward / Conclusion: Index post-matric scholarships to inflation, fill backlog SC/ST/OBC faculty vacancies in central universities, scale PM-USHA RUSA infrastructure, and audit private deemed universities to prevent diploma-mill expansion.

Key points
  • AISHE 2021-22 — GER 28.4 percent; female 28.5 percent, male 28.3 percent
  • SC GER 25.9 percent, ST GER 21.2 percent, both below national average
  • NEP 2020 target — 50 percent GER by 2035
  • 103rd Constitutional Amendment 2019 — 10 percent EWS reservation
  • Academic Bank of Credits and 4-year UG with research under NEP 2020
  • Proposed Higher Education Commission of India Bill to merge UGC, AICTE, NCTE
  • Thorat Committee report (2007) on caste discrimination at AIIMS
  • PM-USHA (Pradhan Mantri Uchchatar Shiksha Abhiyan) funds state universities

Open full model answer →

Q.1510 marks · 150w 9 min Medium

India’s female labour force participation rose from 23.3 percent in 2017-18 to 41.7 percent in 2023-24 per PLFS data, but most additions are in unpaid family labour and agriculture. Examine why a rise in counting has not become a rise in opportunity.

Subtopic: Social Justice · Human Resources

Show model answer outline

Introduction: The Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS) for 2023-24 (released 23 September 2024) shows female labour-force participation jumping from 23.3 percent (2017-18) to 41.7 percent — an 18-point rise.

Body: Three dimensions — (i) Composition: women classified as 'helpers in household enterprises' more than doubled from 9.1 percent to 19.6 percent, and rural women's engagement in agriculture rose from 71.1 percent (2018-19) to 76.9 percent (2023-24); (ii) Pay gap: self-employed men earn about 2.8 times what self-employed women earn; regular salaried women earn 76 percent of male pay; (iii) Unpaid burden: NSO Time Use Survey 2024 — women spend 289 minutes/day on unpaid domestic work against men's 88 minutes.

Way forward / Conclusion: Public investment in the care economy (creches, eldercare, school meals) per the ILO 5R framework; enforce Code on Wages 2019 equal-pay clause; and operationalise Section 67 of Code on Social Security 2020 for women platform workers.

Key points
  • PLFS 2023-24 — female LFPR 41.7 percent vs 23.3 percent in 2017-18
  • 'Helpers in household enterprises' share doubled from 9.1 to 19.6 percent
  • Rural women in agriculture — 71.1 percent (2018-19) to 76.9 percent (2023-24)
  • Time Use Survey 2024 — 289 minutes/day unpaid domestic work for women vs 88 for men
  • Self-employed women earn about 36 percent of self-employed men; regular salaried women 76 percent
  • Code on Wages 2019 — Section 3 prohibits gender discrimination in pay
  • Care economy estimated at $300 billion opportunity, 60 million potential jobs by 2030 (Primus Partners)

Open full model answer →

Q.1615 marks · 250w 14 min Medium

The Code on Social Security 2020 came into force on 21 November 2025, recognising gig and platform workers for the first time in Indian statute. Discuss the design and the recognition-versus-delivery gap.

Subtopic: Social Justice · Human Resources

Show model answer outline

Introduction: The Code on Social Security 2020 was notified into force on 21 November 2025, consolidating nine social-security laws and naming 'gig worker' and 'platform worker' as statutory categories for the first time.

Body: Three dimensions — (i) Architecture: Section 2(35) defines gig worker; Section 141 mandates a Social Security Fund financed by aggregator contributions (1-2 percent of turnover or 5 percent of payouts), with e-Shram as the unified registry (31.38 crore registered by 27 November 2025); (ii) Scale: about 90 percent of India's workforce is informal contributing nearly 50 percent of GDP; NITI Aayog (2022) projects gig workforce will reach 2.35 crore by 2029-30 from 77 lakh in 2020-21; (iii) Delivery gap: rules under sections 109 and 114 still pending in many states, no operational Social Security Fund disbursement, ESI/EPFO portability incomplete.

Way forward / Conclusion: Notify aggregator-contribution rules with platform-level audits, port ABHA-PM-JAY benefits to e-Shram IDs, build a federated Social Security Fund with state matching, and recognise Rajasthan Platform-Based Gig Workers Act 2023 as a model.

Key points
  • Code on Social Security 2020 notified into force 21 November 2025 (PIB)
  • Consolidates 9 social-security laws — EPF, ESI, Maternity Benefit, Gratuity, etc.
  • Defines 'gig worker' (Section 2(35)) and 'platform worker' (Section 2(60))
  • e-Shram registry — 31.38 crore unorganised workers (27 November 2025); women 53.68 percent
  • Social Security Fund (Section 141) financed by aggregator contributions (1-2 percent of turnover)
  • Informal sector — 90 percent of workforce, 50 percent of GDP (ILO India Employment Report 2024)
  • Gig workforce projected to triple from 77 lakh (2020-21) to 2.35 crore by 2029-30 (NITI Aayog 2022)
  • Rajasthan Platform-Based Gig Workers (Registration and Welfare) Act 2023 as state pioneer

Open full model answer →

Q.1710 marks · 150w 9 min Hard

India’s demographic dividend is projected to close around 2046 even as the Sample Registration System 2024 reports a TFR of 2.0. Examine the implications for human-resource policy and skilling.

Subtopic: Social Justice · Human Resources

Show model answer outline

Introduction: India's working-age (15-59) population peaks around 2041 and the demographic dividend window closes around 2046, when the over-60 cohort overtakes those under 14, per UNFPA 2023 and SRS 2024 data.

Body: Three dimensions — (i) Demographic shift: TFR fell from 2.2 (SRS 2020) to 2.0 (SRS 2024), already below replacement; southern states have TFR below 1.7; (ii) Skills gap: India Skills Report 2024 — only 51.3 percent of graduates are employable; PMKVY 4.0 has trained around 1.4 crore but placement remains under 25 percent; (iii) Policy levers: National Apprenticeship Promotion Scheme, ITI revamp (Rs 60,000 crore plan announced in Union Budget 2025-26), Skill India Digital Hub, and Atmanirbhar Skilled Employee-Employer Mapping (ASEEM) portal.

Way forward / Conclusion: Industry-linked dual-system apprenticeships (German model), align skilling with PLI-anchored sectors, expand female ITI seats, and integrate skilling outcomes into the 16th Finance Commission's grants framework.

Key points
  • Dividend window narrows by 2046; UNFPA 2023 projects 20.8 percent 60-plus population
  • TFR fell from 2.2 (SRS 2020) to 2.0 (SRS 2024) — at replacement level
  • Southern states (Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Karnataka) TFR below 1.7
  • India Skills Report 2024 — 51.3 percent of graduates employable
  • PMKVY 4.0 trained about 1.4 crore; placement under 25 percent
  • Union Budget 2025-26 announced Rs 60,000 crore ITI revamp scheme
  • PLFS 2023-24 youth (15-29) unemployment 10.2 percent
  • Skill India Digital Hub, ASEEM portal, NAPS for apprenticeships

Open full model answer →

Q.1815 marks · 250w 14 min Medium

Neighbourhood First is being stress-tested as governments in Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka and the Maldives change against incumbents friendly to India. With reference to specific instruments such as MAHASAGAR and the Greater Male Connectivity Project, examine India’s recalibration.

Subtopic: IR · India and its neighbourhood

Show model answer outline

Introduction: 'Neighbourhood First', anchored in the 5S vocabulary (Samman, Samvad, Shanti, Samriddhi, Sanskriti), promises non-reciprocal generosity to immediate neighbours, complemented by SAGAR (2015, Mauritius) and its 2025 expansion to MAHASAGAR.

Body: Three dimensions — (i) Political churn: Tarique Rahman's BNP swept Bangladesh polls in February 2026 (212 of 300 seats), Muizzu's 'India Out' recalibrated to 'trusted friend' in Maldives, NPP's Dissanayake in Sri Lanka chose New Delhi as first foreign visit; (ii) Instruments: India supplied 5,000 MT diesel within days of Rahman's swearing-in; Rs 600 crore aid to Maldives in Budget 2025; co-chaired Sri Lanka Official Creditor Committee with Japan and France for $5.9 billion debt restructuring; (iii) China factor: Hambantota 99-year lease ($1.12 billion, 2017), $3.7 billion Sinopec Hambantota refinery (January 2025), but Beijing slowed mega-loans and declined Pakistan's ML-1 railway financing.

Way forward / Conclusion: Move from leader-led to institution-led ties, push BBIN MVA, prioritise grid and transit (Trincomalee, Greater Male) and avoid the Adani-Bangladesh power-supply pricing trap; restore SAARC functionality through BIMSTEC as bridge.

Key points
  • Neighbourhood First 5S — Samman, Samvad, Shanti, Samriddhi, Sanskriti
  • Bangladesh 2026 election — BNP won 212/300 seats; Tarique Rahman PM from 17 February 2026
  • India-Bangladesh trade $14 billion (FY24); India supplies more than 2.4 GW electricity daily
  • Sri Lanka 2022 — India extended about $4 billion emergency support, co-chair OCC for $5.9 billion debt restructuring
  • Maldives — $750 million currency swap window till 2027, Rs 600 crore aid (Budget 2025, +28%)
  • Greater Male Connectivity Project — $400 million LoC + $100 million grant, largest infra project in Maldives
  • Hambantota Port — 99-year lease to China Merchants Port ($1.12 billion, 2017); $3.7 billion Sinopec refinery (January 2025)
  • SAGAR (2015) expanded to MAHASAGAR (Mutual and Holistic Advancement for Security and Growth Across Regions) in Mauritius 2025

Open full model answer →

Q.1910 marks · 150w 9 min Easy

India’s Nepal policy has oscillated between an open-border, currency-pegged friendship and friction over the 2015 Constitution, the Kalapani map and EPG report non-acceptance. Examine the structural irritants and the recent stabilisation.

Subtopic: IR · India and its neighbourhood

Show model answer outline

Introduction: India and Nepal share an open border under the 1950 Treaty of Peace and Friendship, with a pegged Nepalese rupee at 1.6 INR and over 6 million Nepalese living in India.

Body: Three dimensions — (i) Irritants: Nepal's Constitution (September 2015) was followed by a Madhesi blockade; the 2020 'new political map' included Kalapani, Lipulekh and Limpiyadhura; the Eminent Persons Group (EPG) report (2018) remains unaccepted; (ii) Connectivity wins: Motihari-Amlekhgunj petroleum pipeline (September 2019, 69 km), Jaynagar-Janakpur railway (April 2022), Arun-III hydropower (900 MW under SJVN); (iii) China factor: Nepal-China Trans-Himalayan Railway feasibility study and 2017 BRI MoU; the pro-China KP Sharma Oli government dissolved in mid-2024 to a Prachanda-Deuba coalition that recalibrated toward Delhi.

Way forward / Conclusion: Receive the EPG report, conclude the long-pending Pancheshwar DPR under the Mahakali Treaty 1996, expand 10,000 MW power-purchase agreements and let states (UP, Bihar) lead micro-cooperation under BBIN MVA.

Key points
  • Treaty of Peace and Friendship 1950; open border and currency peg (1.6 NPR per INR)
  • Nepal Constitution 2015 — Madhesi blockade 2015-16 strained ties
  • Nepal's 2020 'new political map' includes Kalapani, Lipulekh, Limpiyadhura (Sino-Indian Mahakali confluence)
  • Eminent Persons Group (EPG) report on bilateral framework (2018) — not accepted by India
  • Motihari-Amlekhgunj petroleum pipeline (September 2019, 69 km)
  • Jaynagar-Janakpur railway (April 2022); Arun-III hydropower 900 MW under SJVN
  • Mahakali Treaty 1996 — Pancheshwar multipurpose project DPR pending

Open full model answer →

Q.2010 marks · 150w 9 min Easy

BIMSTEC was revived as the Bay of Bengal alternative to a deadlocked SAARC, with the Charter entering force in May 2024. Examine its present trajectory, with reference to the 2025 outcomes and connectivity priorities.

Subtopic: IR · India and its neighbourhood

Show model answer outline

Introduction: BIMSTEC, founded in 1997 as BIST-EC and renamed in 2004, links 5 South Asian states (India, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Nepal, Sri Lanka) with 2 Southeast Asian (Myanmar, Thailand). The BIMSTEC Charter entered into force 20 May 2024.

Body: Three dimensions — (i) Strategic value: 22 percent of world population, $5+ trillion combined GDP, Bay of Bengal connectivity bridge for Act East; (ii) Sixth Summit Bangkok (4 April 2025) — Bangkok Vision 2030, BIMSTEC Centre of Excellence on Disaster Management at Noida, BIMSTEC Chamber of Commerce, master plan on transport connectivity; (iii) Limits: pending BIMSTEC Free Trade Agreement (mooted 2004), Myanmar civil war disrupts BIMSTEC Motor Vehicles Agreement, no joint defence framework yet.

Way forward / Conclusion: Close the BIMSTEC FTA, operationalise Kaladan Multi-Modal Transit Project and Trilateral Highway, and make BIMSTEC the Bay of Bengal connectivity backbone alongside MAHASAGAR.

Key points
  • BIMSTEC — 7 members (India, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Myanmar, Thailand)
  • BIMSTEC Charter entered force 20 May 2024
  • Sixth Summit Bangkok (4 April 2025) — Bangkok Vision 2030
  • BIMSTEC Centre of Excellence on Disaster Management to be hosted at Noida
  • 22 percent of world population; $5+ trillion combined GDP
  • BIMSTEC FTA stalled since 2004; Master Plan on Transport Connectivity adopted 2022
  • Kaladan Multi-Modal Transit Project and India-Myanmar-Thailand Trilateral Highway as physical spines

Open full model answer →