Opens in a new tab
Join Anantam IAS Channel on Telegram

GS 3 · Practice archive

GS Paper 3 practice questions for UPSC Mains 2026.

Economy, Environment, Science and Technology, Internal Security, Disaster Management.

20 Qs / 250 marks439 questionsModel outlines included

GS Paper 3 · Tips & tricks

GS-3 — data first, then policy, then a concrete way forward

  1. Open with a number.GDP share, FDI inflow, emissions intensity, forest cover %, fiscal deficit — the right number in the first sentence does the work of a paragraph.
  2. Cite the latest report by name.Economic Survey, RBI Financial Stability Report, NITI Aayog SDG India Index, ISRO mission timeline — examiners can verify, so accuracy is checked.
  3. Use a flowchart for processes.Disaster cycle, ML pipeline, food-processing value chain, cybersecurity kill chain — a small labelled diagram beats prose.
  4. Distinguish stock from flow.Forex reserves vs trade balance, debt stock vs deficit, capacity installed vs energy generated. Mixing them up costs marks.
  5. Way forward must be specific.Not "the government should take steps" — name the ministry, the scheme name, the budget head, the timeline.
Q.115 marks · 250w 14 min Medium

The IndiaAI Mission has been called the country’s most ambitious sovereign AI bet. Examine its seven pillars, the compute strategy, and the gaps in indigenous foundation-model capacity.

Subtopic: Sci-Tech · IT and AI

Show model answer outline

Introduction: Union Cabinet approved the IndiaAI Mission on 7 March 2024 with an outlay of ₹10,371.92 crore over five years (MeitY); Stanford HAI AI Index 2025 ranks India 2nd globally on AI talent with ~50,460 AI authors and inventors.

Body: 1) Seven pillars — AIKosh datasets, Compute Capacity (10,000+ GPUs PPP), Innovation Centre, Application Development, FutureSkills, Startup Financing, Safe and Trusted AI. 2) Compute gap — single empanelled provider concentration risk; lag against US and China hyperscalers. 3) Foundation-model gap — India funds applied AI but lacks a sovereign frontier model; Sarvam-1 and Krutrim are small relative to GPT-4 class.

Way forward: Operationalise the AI Safety Institute; pre-fund a sovereign frontier-model consortium; mandate compute neutrality; align with the IT (Intermediary) Amendment Rules 2026 on synthetic content.

Key points
  • IndiaAI Mission outlay ₹10,371.92 crore over five years (Cabinet, 7 March 2024)
  • Seven pillars include AIKosh, Compute Capacity, Innovation Centre, FutureSkills
  • Target of 10,000+ GPUs through public-private partnership
  • Stanford HAI AI Index 2025 — India 2nd on AI talent (~50,460 authors)
  • India passed only one AI-related law 2016-2025 per Stanford index
  • Public concern about AI rose ~14 percentage points 2024-2025
  • IT (Intermediary) Amendment Rules 2026 notified 10 Feb 2026
  • AI Safety Institute announced under IndiaAI Mission

Open full model answer →

Q.210 marks · 150w 9 min Easy

India’s Unified Payments Interface processes over 18 billion transactions a month and has been described as India’s most consequential tech export. Examine UPI’s global footprint and the systemic risks of payment concentration.

Subtopic: Sci-Tech · Fintech and DPI

Show model answer outline

Introduction: NPCI reported 18.4 billion UPI transactions in March 2025, worth ₹24.77 lakh crore — the world's largest real-time retail payments rail.

Body: 1) Global rollout — UPI live in UAE, Singapore PayNow link, France (Eiffel Tower), Sri Lanka, Mauritius, Bhutan. 2) Concentration risk — PhonePe and Google Pay together ~85% market share against NPCI's 30% cap (deferred to Dec 2026). 3) Zero-MDR sustainability vs incentive scheme of ₹1,500 crore (Budget 2025-26).

Way forward: Operationalise the 30% market-share cap; expand UPI-PayNow style linkages; price small-merchant MDR transparently.

Key points
  • UPI transactions 18.4 billion in March 2025 (NPCI)
  • Value ₹24.77 lakh crore in March 2025
  • PhonePe + Google Pay >85% market share
  • NPCI 30% cap deferred to 31 December 2026
  • UPI-PayNow linkage with Singapore live February 2023
  • Zero-MDR for P2M up to ₹2,000; ₹1,500 crore incentive in Budget 2025-26

Open full model answer →

Q.315 marks · 250w 14 min Hard

Deepfakes have moved from novelty to systemic threat to electoral integrity and personal dignity. Critically evaluate India’s regulatory response under the IT Amendment Rules 2026 and the residual gaps in the criminal-law framework.

Subtopic: Sci-Tech · AI and IT regulation

Show model answer outline

Introduction: MeitY notified the IT (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Amendment Rules 2026 on 10 February 2026 (effective 20 February 2026); over 50 million AI voice-clone calls were estimated during the 2024 Lok Sabha campaign.

Body: 1) Rules framework — definition of "synthetically generated information," visible labels, embedded provenance, takedown clocks of 3 hours (court/government orders) and 2 hours (intimate-image and impersonation deepfakes). 2) Criminal gaps — BNS 2023 covers identity impersonation under Section 319 but no dedicated deepfake offence; lack of victim restitution. 3) Institutional gap — no statutory AI regulator; reliance on Section 79 safe-harbour conditionality.

Way forward: Standalone Digital India Act with risk-tiered AI liability; statutory AI Safety Institute; mandatory C2PA-style content provenance; victim-compensation fund.

Key points
  • IT Amendment Rules 2026 notified 10 Feb 2026 — first binding AI-content rules
  • Takedown clocks: 3 hours for orders, 2 hours for intimate-image and impersonation deepfakes
  • ~50 million AI voice-clone calls before 2024 Lok Sabha polls
  • Section 79 IT Act 2000 — intermediary safe harbour
  • BNS 2023 Sections 318-319 cover cheating and impersonation
  • Election Commission advisory on synthetic media 2024
  • Stanford HAI 2025 — India saw steepest rise in public AI concern (~14 pp)

Open full model answer →

Q.415 marks · 250w 14 min Medium

DRDO’s Pralay, Pinaka and Mission Divyastra have signalled an indigenisation pivot in India’s strategic weapons. Critically evaluate DRDO’s restructuring after the 2023 panel and the remaining gaps in defence R&D.

Subtopic: Sci-Tech · Achievements of Indians

Show model answer outline

Introduction: Mission Divyastra demonstrated Agni-5 MIRV capability on 11 March 2024 — India joined a small club of MIRV powers; Defence R&D budget for 2025-26 stands at ₹26,816 crore (~0.7% of total defence outlay).

Body: 1) Indigenisation pivot — Pralay quasi-ballistic missile inducted 2023; Pinaka exported to Armenia; iDEX startups received 500+ contracts. 2) Restructuring — K. Vijayaraghavan Committee 2023 recommended a Defence Technology Council chaired by PM, slimmer DRDO. 3) Gaps — public R&D ~0.65% of GDP (DST 2024); private defence R&D thin; long programme cycles.

Way forward: Operationalise Defence Technology Council; raise R&D to 2% of GDP per Anusandhan NRF target; expand iDEX and Technology Development Fund; ring-fence frontier-tech budgets.

Key points
  • Mission Divyastra Agni-5 MIRV test 11 March 2024
  • Defence R&D 2025-26 budget ₹26,816 crore
  • Vijayaraghavan Committee report on DRDO restructuring (2023)
  • Anusandhan National Research Foundation Act 2023
  • iDEX 500+ contracts to defence startups
  • Public R&D ~0.65% of GDP (DST R&D Statistics 2024)
  • BrahMos exports to Philippines from 2024
  • Pralay inducted into Indian Army 2023

Open full model answer →

Q.515 marks · 250w 14 min Medium

Indian Space Policy 2023 and the FDI liberalisation of 2024 have created the conditions for a private space industry. Examine the role of IN-SPACe and NSIL and the legislative gaps in space liability and IP.

Subtopic: Sci-Tech · Space

Show model answer outline

Introduction: Indian Space Policy 2023 notified by Department of Space on 20 April 2023; FDI policy revised 21 February 2024 — up to 100% under automatic route for satellites (74% for manufacturing, 49% for launch vehicles); ~190 space startups (DPIIT 2025).

Body: 1) Institutional roles — IN-SPACe as single-window authoriser (300+ authorisations), NSIL as commercial arm, ISRO retains R&D. 2) Private milestones — Skyroot Vikram-S suborbital (Nov 2022), Agnikul Agnibaan SOrTeD (May 2024). 3) Legislative gaps — no Space Activities Act yet, no liability/insurance framework, IP allocation between IN-SPACe authorisations and private innovators unclear.

Way forward: Pass Space Activities Bill 2025; ratify Liability and Registration Conventions in domestic law; create a dedicated space-IP regime; structured procurement from private launch providers.

Key points
  • Indian Space Policy 2023 notified 20 April 2023
  • Space FDI policy revised 21 February 2024
  • 100% automatic route for satellites, 74% manufacturing, 49% launch
  • IN-SPACe authorisations 300+ by 2025
  • Skyroot Vikram-S 18 Nov 2022; Agnikul Agnibaan SOrTeD 30 May 2024
  • Outer Space Treaty 1967, Liability Convention 1972
  • Bharatiya Antariksh Station target 2035
  • Department of Space Budget 2025-26 ₹13,416 crore

Open full model answer →

Q.615 marks · 250w 14 min Hard

The India Semiconductor Mission has committed ₹76,000 crore in incentives but the country still has only one mature-node fab approved. Discuss the structural composition of ISM 1.0 versus ISM 2.0 and the binding constraints below the fab gate.

Subtopic: Sci-Tech · Semiconductors and indigenisation

Show model answer outline

Introduction: ISM 1.0 approved December 2021 with ₹76,000 crore outlay; by December 2025, 10 approved projects with ~₹1.6 lakh crore committed across six states (MeitY); Tata-PSMC Dholera is the only front-end fab.

Body: 1) Composition — 1 fab (28nm and above) + 5 OSAT/ATMP units; Micron Sanand, Tata Jagiroad, CG-Renesas, Kaynes, HCL-Foxconn. 2) Materials and equipment gap — photoresist, slurry, specialty gases all imported; sovereignty at fab gate is illusory. 3) ISM 2.0 (Budget 2026-27, ₹1,000 crore FY26 provision) pivots to equipment, materials, design IP, and skilling.

Way forward: Scale ISM 2.0 funding to match the ecosystem gap; deepen Design Linked Incentive (target 100 firms, 20 past ₹1,500 crore revenue); secure critical-mineral supply via KABIL and Quad chip alliance.

Key points
  • ISM 1.0 outlay ₹76,000 crore approved December 2021
  • 10 approved projects, ~₹1.6 lakh crore committed by December 2025
  • Tata-PSMC Dholera: up to ₹91,000 crore, 50,000 wafers/month at 28nm+
  • Micron Sanand ATMP ₹22,500+ crore inaugurated 28 Feb 2026
  • Tata Jagiroad OSAT ₹27,000 crore (Assam)
  • ISM 2.0 — ₹1,000 crore FY26 provision, focus on equipment and materials
  • ISRO Vikram 3201 — first indigenous 32-bit microprocessor (2025)
  • Design Linked Incentive targets 100 design firms

Open full model answer →

Q.715 marks · 250w 14 min Hard

The National Quantum Mission has approved an outlay of ₹6,003.65 crore against China’s roughly $15 billion in quantum investment. Examine the mission’s hub architecture, indigenous milestones, and the post-quantum cryptography roadmap.

Subtopic: Sci-Tech · Emerging tech

Show model answer outline

Introduction: Cabinet approved the National Quantum Mission on 19 April 2023 with ₹6,003.65 crore over eight years (DST); Amaravati Quantum Valley launched 7 February 2026 with IBM Quantum System Two.

Body: 1) Four Thematic Hubs — Computing at IISc, Communication at IIT Madras + C-DOT, Sensing at IIT Bombay, Materials at IIT Delhi; 152 researchers across 43 institutions. 2) Indigenous milestones — QpiAI-Indus 25-qubit machine (14 April 2025); Dimira cryogenic cables; ISRO entanglement-based QKD over 300 m. 3) PQC roadmap — DST released migration plan February 2026; CII to PQC by 2029, enterprises by 2033, aligned to NIST FIPS 203-205 (August 2024).

Way forward: Increase NQM corpus through a private-capital window; mandate PQC migration for Aadhaar, UPI, defence networks; expand satellite QKD beyond 2,000 km target.

Key points
  • NQM outlay ₹6,003.65 crore, 8 years, approved 19 April 2023
  • Target: 50-1,000 physical qubits in 8 years
  • 4 Thematic Hubs at IISc, IIT Madras, IIT Bombay, IIT Delhi
  • QpiAI-Indus 25-qubit superconducting computer (14 April 2025)
  • Amaravati Quantum Valley launched 7 February 2026
  • China ~$15 billion vs India $0.73 billion (orders of magnitude gap)
  • NIST PQC standards FIPS 203, 204, 205 finalised 13 August 2024
  • DST PQC roadmap: CII by 2029, enterprises by 2033

Open full model answer →

Q.815 marks · 250w 14 min Medium

The BioE3 Policy 2024 targets a US$300 billion bioeconomy by 2030. Examine the role of the National Biofoundry Network, the genome-edited rice release of May 2025, and the unfinished GM-crop regulatory architecture.

Subtopic: Sci-Tech · Biotechnology

Show model answer outline

Introduction: BioE3 Policy approved 24 August 2024; bioeconomy at US$195.3 billion in 2025 (~4.8% of GDP), up from US$10 billion in 2014; 11,855 biotech startups in 2025 (DBT India Bioeconomy Report).

Body: 1) Six BioE3 sectors — bio-chemicals, smart proteins, precision biotherapeutics, climate-resilient agriculture, carbon capture, marine/space biotech. 2) National Biofoundry Network — 21 facilities launched 1 September 2025. 3) Genome-edited rice Kamala (DRR Dhan 100) and Pusa DST Rice 1 released 4 May 2025 via CRISPR SDN-1; ~19% higher yield, 20% lower emissions. 4) Regulatory gap — Supreme Court split verdict on GM mustard DMH-11 (July 2024) directed Centre to frame National GM Crop Policy.

Way forward: Operationalise National GM Crop Policy; bring GEAC under a statutory Biotechnology Regulatory Authority; expand biofoundry access to startups; align SDN-1 exemption with EU/US norms.

Key points
  • BioE3 Policy approved 24 August 2024 by Union Cabinet
  • Bioeconomy US$195.3 billion in 2025, ~4.8% of GDP
  • Target US$300 billion by 2030; longer goal ~US$1 trillion by 2047
  • National Biofoundry Network — 21 facilities launched 1 Sept 2025
  • Kamala and Pusa DST Rice 1 released 4 May 2025 (CRISPR SDN-1)
  • Kamala: ~19% higher yield, 20% lower emissions, 20 days earlier maturity
  • SC split verdict on GM mustard DMH-11 (July 2024) ordered National GM Crop Policy
  • GEAC under EPA 1986 rules of 1989

Open full model answer →

Q.910 marks · 150w 9 min Easy

ISRO’s SpaDeX docking experiment and Chandrayaan-3 South Pole landing have placed India in elite space company. Examine the strategic and commercial significance of these achievements.

Subtopic: Sci-Tech · Achievements of Indians

Show model answer outline

Introduction: Chandrayaan-3's Vikram lander touched down at 69.37°S near the lunar south pole on 23 August 2023 — India became the fourth country to soft-land on the Moon and first at the south pole; SpaDeX achieved its first docking on 16 January 2025, making India the fourth nation in the docking club.

Body: 1) Strategic significance — south-pole water-ice access for future habitats; docking is a prerequisite for the Bharatiya Antariksh Station targeted for 2035. 2) Commercial spillover — IN-SPACe authorisations crossed 300; NSIL handled the LVM3-OneWeb contracts worth ~₹1,000 crore. 3) Talent and industry stack — ~190 space startups (2025).

Way forward: Operationalise the BAS roadmap; accelerate Gaganyaan H1 launch; scale NSIL's commercial portfolio.

Key points
  • Chandrayaan-3 Vikram soft-landed 23 August 2023 at 69.37°S
  • SpaDeX first docking 16 January 2025
  • Bharatiya Antariksh Station targeted for 2035
  • Gaganyaan crewed flight planned 2027
  • IN-SPACe authorisations 300+ as of 2025
  • ~190 Indian space startups (DPIIT)

Open full model answer →

Q.1010 marks · 150w 9 min Hard

Kessler Syndrome and rising orbital congestion threaten the long-term sustainability of low Earth orbit. Discuss India’s contribution to space debris and the role of Project NETRA.

Subtopic: Sci-Tech · Space and IPR

Show model answer outline

Introduction: ESA Space Debris Office (Annual Report 2024) tracks ~40,500 objects larger than 10 cm in Earth orbit; ISRO target of debris-free Indian missions by 2030 announced in 2024.

Body: 1) Indian debris share — PSLV-C37 upper stage and Mission Shakti 2019 ASAT debris; ISRO's IS4OM tracks 28,000+ objects. 2) Project NETRA — Bengaluru-based space situational awareness facility. 3) International framework — UN COPUOS LTS guidelines, Outer Space Treaty 1967.

Way forward: Active debris-removal demonstration mission; legally binding global ASAT moratorium; expand NETRA to deep-space tracking.

Key points
  • ~40,500 objects >10 cm in orbit (ESA 2024)
  • ISRO debris-free missions target by 2030
  • Project NETRA inaugurated 2022 (ISRO)
  • IS4OM tracks 28,000+ objects
  • Mission Shakti ASAT 27 March 2019
  • UN COPUOS Long-Term Sustainability Guidelines 2019

Open full model answer →

Q.1110 marks · 150w 9 min Medium

India’s gene-editing classification of SDN-1, SDN-2 and SDN-3 has carved out a non-GM exemption route. Discuss the science and the policy implications for Indian agriculture.

Subtopic: Sci-Tech · Biotechnology and IPR

Show model answer outline

Introduction: MoEFCC office memorandum (March 2022) exempts SDN-1 and SDN-2 edits without foreign DNA from Rules 1989 GM-organism regulation; backed by DBT 2022 guidelines for safety assessment of genome-edited plants.

Body: 1) Science — SDN-1 no template (knock-out), SDN-2 small template (point edits), SDN-3 large insert (transgene). 2) Implications — Kamala and Pusa DST Rice 1 (4 May 2025) released under SDN-1 exemption; faster regulatory pathway. 3) Concerns — civil-society challenge to exemption; lack of segregation in seed system.

Way forward: Statutory backing via Biotechnology Regulatory Authority Bill; mandatory PPV&FR Act 2001 registration of edited varieties; transparent biosafety dossiers.

Key points
  • MoEFCC OM March 2022 exempts SDN-1 and SDN-2 from Rules 1989
  • Kamala (DRR Dhan 100) and Pusa DST Rice 1 released 4 May 2025
  • DBT Safety Assessment Guidelines for Genome Edited Plants 2022
  • SDN-1 ~19% yield gain (Kamala), 20% lower emissions
  • Supreme Court split on DMH-11 GM mustard July 2024
  • GEAC under Rules 1989 of EPA 1986

Open full model answer →

Q.1210 marks · 150w 9 min Medium

India’s research and development spending has plateaued near 0.65% of GDP, well below the 2% target. Examine the role of the Anusandhan National Research Foundation in correcting this deep-tech gap.

Subtopic: Sci-Tech · R&D and innovation

Show model answer outline

Introduction: DST Research and Development Statistics 2024 records gross expenditure on R&D (GERD) at ~0.65% of GDP, against China's 2.4% and South Korea's 4.9%; Anusandhan National Research Foundation Act 2023 envisages ₹50,000 crore over five years (₹14,000 crore government, ₹36,000 crore private).

Body: 1) Structural gap — private R&D under 40% of GERD vs 75-80% in OECD; weak university research; thin patent commercialisation. 2) ANRF design — PM as ex-officio President; mission-mode grants; private co-funding model. 3) Frontier areas — semiconductor design, AI, quantum, biotech connected via deep-tech start-up policy 2025.

Way forward: Operationalise ANRF governance board; expand SERB consolidated into ANRF; mandatory CSR-R&D channelisation; raise GERD to 2% by 2030.

Key points
  • GERD ~0.65% of GDP (DST R&D Statistics 2024)
  • ANRF Act 2023 — ₹50,000 crore over five years
  • Private R&D <40% of GERD vs OECD ~75%
  • Deep Tech Startup Policy released 2025
  • Patent grants by IPO ~103,000 in 2023-24
  • PMRF doctoral fellowships scaled to 3,000
  • Education Ministry Vigyan Dhara scheme 2024
  • Quad Open RAN and Critical Tech Initiative

Open full model answer →

Q.1315 marks · 250w 14 min Medium

The Digital Public Infrastructure stack of Aadhaar, UPI and DigiLocker has been called India’s most consequential tech export. Examine the architecture of India Stack and the governance challenges posed by the DPDP Act 2023.

Subtopic: Sci-Tech · DPI

Show model answer outline

Introduction: Aadhaar reached 1.4 billion enrolments by 2025 (UIDAI); UPI handled 18.4 billion transactions in March 2025; G20 New Delhi Declaration 2023 endorsed DPI as a development framework.

Body: 1) India Stack layers — Identity (Aadhaar), Payments (UPI, Aadhaar Enabled Payments), Data (Account Aggregator, DigiLocker), Sectoral (ABDM, OCEN, AgriStack, ONDC). 2) DPDP Act 2023 — notice and consent, Data Protection Board, exemptions for State processing under Section 17. 3) Governance gaps — DPDP rules pending operationalisation; Aadhaar exclusion documented (Hadi-Reetika Khera research); MOSIP exports to ~12 countries.

Way forward: Notify DPDP Rules with grievance redress timelines; strengthen Data Protection Board independence; mandate exclusion audits; export India Stack via MOSIP partnerships.

Key points
  • Aadhaar enrolments 1.4 billion by 2025
  • UPI 18.4 billion transactions in March 2025
  • DPDP Act 2023 notified 11 August 2023
  • Section 17 exemptions for State agencies
  • Account Aggregator framework live 2021
  • ABDM 76+ crore ABHA IDs by 2025
  • G20 New Delhi Declaration DPI endorsement Sept 2023
  • MOSIP open-source ID adopted by 12+ countries

Open full model answer →

Q.1410 marks · 150w 9 min Easy

The Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission aims to build a federated health data ecosystem. Discuss its architecture and the privacy-by-design challenges in scaling ABHA.

Subtopic: Sci-Tech · DPI and health

Show model answer outline

Introduction: ABDM launched 27 September 2021 by Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; 76+ crore ABHA IDs and 4.5+ lakh linked health facilities by 2025 (NHA dashboard).

Body: 1) Architecture — ABHA (health ID), HPR (healthcare professional registry), HFR (health facility registry), Unified Health Interface. 2) Privacy challenges — federated data, no central health locker; DPDP Act 2023 children-and-disabled safeguards. 3) Adoption gap — private hospitals slow to integrate.

Way forward: Mandate ABHA-linked claims under PMJAY; strict HMIS interoperability standards; explicit health-data fiduciary regime under DPDP Rules.

Key points
  • ABDM launched 27 September 2021 by MoHFW
  • 76+ crore ABHA IDs created by 2025
  • 4.5+ lakh facilities linked to HFR
  • Unified Health Interface (UHI) for service discovery
  • PMJAY claims integration with ABHA
  • DPDP Act 2023 — children consent threshold 18

Open full model answer →

Q.1510 marks · 150w 9 min Medium

India’s robotics and drone ecosystem is rapidly indigenising under the PLI for drones and the Drone Rules 2021. Examine the policy framework and the dual-use security implications.

Subtopic: Sci-Tech · Robotics and indigenisation

Show model answer outline

Introduction: Drone Rules 2021 (MoCA, 25 August 2021) replaced restrictive 2018 framework; PLI for drones outlay ₹120 crore over three years (FY22-24); domestic drone market valued at ~US$1.4 billion in 2024.

Body: 1) Policy stack — Digital Sky platform, type certification by QCI, NPNT (No Permission, No Take-off). 2) Achievements — Namo Drone Didi scheme (15,000 drones to women SHGs), Garuda Aerospace, ideaForge. 3) Security risks — IAF drone strike Jammu airbase 2021; counter-drone systems by DRDO.

Way forward: Counter-Unmanned Aircraft Systems policy; spectrum allocation for BVLOS; export controls for dual-use components; strict licensing of foreign-origin components.

Key points
  • Drone Rules 2021 notified 25 August 2021 (MoCA)
  • PLI drones outlay ₹120 crore FY22-24
  • Domestic drone market ~US$1.4 billion in 2024
  • Namo Drone Didi — 15,000 drones to SHGs
  • Jammu airbase drone attack 27 June 2021
  • Digital Sky and NPNT compliance

Open full model answer →

Q.1615 marks · 250w 14 min Medium

The National Green Hydrogen Mission targets 5 MMT of annual green hydrogen production by 2030. Examine the SIGHT incentives, the cost competitiveness challenge, and the demand-creation strategy.

Subtopic: Environment · Climate and energy mix

Show model answer outline

Introduction: Cabinet approved National Green Hydrogen Mission on 4 January 2023 with ₹19,744 crore outlay (FY24-30); target 5 MMT GH2 by 2030; SIGHT (Strategic Interventions for Green Hydrogen Transition) is the financing arm with ₹17,490 crore.

Body: 1) Cost gap — green H2 at ~US$5-6/kg vs grey H2 at US$1.5-2/kg; SIGHT bridges via electrolyser and hydrogen-production tranches. 2) Demand creation — refineries, fertilisers, steel given green H2 obligations; pilot in shipping and heavy mobility. 3) Bottlenecks — electrolyser imports, water consumption (~9 kg per kg H2), grid integration.

Way forward: Accelerate domestic electrolyser PLI; mandate green-H2 purchase obligations on PSUs; integrate with renewable capacity tenders; finalise certification standards.

Key points
  • NGHM outlay ₹19,744 crore (Cabinet, 4 January 2023)
  • 5 MMT green hydrogen target by 2030
  • SIGHT scheme ₹17,490 crore
  • Green H2 cost ~US$5-6/kg vs grey US$1.5-2/kg
  • Refineries, fertilisers, steel — anchor demand sectors
  • Indian Green Hydrogen Certification notified 2024
  • Pilot under hydrogen valley clusters
  • Target 125 GW additional RE for GH2

Open full model answer →

Q.1710 marks · 150w 9 min Medium

COP28 in Dubai produced the first “transitioning away from fossil fuels” outcome and the operationalisation of the Loss and Damage Fund. Discuss India’s positioning and the implementation deficits flagged at COP29 Baku.

Subtopic: Environment · Climate diplomacy

Show model answer outline

Introduction: COP28 UAE Consensus (13 December 2023) called for "transitioning away from fossil fuels in energy systems" and tripled renewables target; Loss and Damage Fund operationalised under World Bank; COP29 Baku (Nov 2024) agreed New Collective Quantified Goal of US$300 billion/year by 2035.

Body: 1) India's stand — defended developmental space, opposed phase-out language; CBDR-RC principle. 2) Finance gap — NCQG US$300 billion vs developing-country need of US$1.3 trillion. 3) Just Energy Transition Partnerships excluded India.

Way forward: Demand mobilisation roadmap by 2026; push for Article 9 grants vs loans; advocate fossil-fuel subsidy reform with carve-outs for developing countries.

Key points
  • COP28 UAE Consensus 13 December 2023
  • Loss and Damage Fund operationalised at COP28
  • COP29 NCQG US$300 billion/year by 2035
  • India's CBDR-RC and equity stand
  • Global Stocktake first cycle concluded COP28
  • Tripling renewables target by 2030

Open full model answer →

Q.1815 marks · 250w 14 min Medium

India’s Environment Impact Assessment regime has been amended through draft notifications and project-specific exemptions since 2020. Examine the institutional design under EIA 2006 and the dilution concerns flagged by the Supreme Court.

Subtopic: Environment · EIA

Show model answer outline

Introduction: EIA Notification 2006 issued under Section 3 of Environment Protection Act 1986; SC in Vanashakti vs Union of India (May 2025) struck down post-facto environmental clearances; draft EIA 2020 still not finalised.

Body: 1) Process — screening, scoping, public consultation, appraisal by EAC/SEIAA. 2) Dilution concerns — exemptions for B2 category projects under 2020 draft; post-facto clearances offered via 2017 and 2021 OMs (struck down). 3) Capacity gap — under-resourced SEIAAs; opaque public hearings.

Way forward: Finalise EIA notification with broader public consultation timelines; statutory EAC mandates; geo-tagged compliance dashboard; ban on post-facto clearances codified.

Key points
  • EIA Notification 2006 under Section 3 EPA 1986
  • Vanashakti vs Union of India (SC, May 2025) on post-facto EC
  • Draft EIA 2020 yet to be finalised
  • Category A — Centre (EAC); Category B — State (SEIAA)
  • Public consultation under Para 7 of EIA 2006
  • PRAVAH portal for online EC tracking
  • Common HVPN Vanashakti judgment cited Lalit Miglani precedent
  • NGT Act 2010 — Section 16 appeals

Open full model answer →

Q.1910 marks · 150w 9 min Medium

The Forest (Conservation) Amendment Act 2023 has redefined the scope of “forest land.” Discuss the changes, the constitutional challenges and the implications for India’s NDC sink target.

Subtopic: Environment · EIA and forests

Show model answer outline

Introduction: Van (Sanrakshan Evam Samvardhan) Adhiniyam 2023 notified December 2023; India's updated NDC commits to an additional carbon sink of 2.5-3 billion tonnes CO2e by 2030.

Body: 1) Key changes — exemption for security infrastructure within 100 km of borders, linear projects up to 10 ha, eco-tourism. 2) Judicial review — SC interim order in Ashok Kumar Sharma vs Union (Feb 2024) applied Godavarman "dictionary meaning" of forest. 3) Carbon-sink impact — risk of denotifying deemed forests reduces sink target.

Way forward: Notify rules implementing SC "dictionary meaning" definition; state-wise deemed-forest inventory in 6 months; mandatory compensatory afforestation audits under CAMPA Act 2016; align with NDC.

Key points
  • Forest Conservation Amendment Act 2023 (Van Adhiniyam) notified Dec 2023
  • Exemption for security infra within 100 km of borders
  • Linear projects up to 10 ha exempt
  • Godavarman 1996 'dictionary meaning' restored by SC interim 2024
  • NDC additional sink 2.5-3 billion tonnes CO2e by 2030
  • CAMPA Act 2016 — compensatory afforestation
  • ISFR 2023 records forest cover 25.17% of geographic area
  • FRA 2006 — community forest rights

Open full model answer →

Q.2010 marks · 150w 9 min Easy

Nano-technology is emerging as a transformative platform across health, energy and materials. Discuss the Nano Mission’s contributions and the regulatory gaps in nano-safety.

Subtopic: Sci-Tech · Nano-tech

Show model answer outline

Introduction: Nano Mission launched by DST in 2007 with ₹1,000 crore Phase II (2014-25); India ranks 3rd globally in nano-science publications (Scopus 2024); 2023 Nobel in Chemistry recognised quantum dots — semiconductors at nanoscale.

Body: 1) Achievements — IIT-Bombay Nanofabrication Facility, Centres of Excellence at IISc and JNCASR, nano-urea by IFFCO commercialised 2021. 2) Gaps — no dedicated nano-safety regulation; FSSAI guidelines pending; occupational exposure standards thin. 3) Strategic value — nano-coatings for stealth, batteries.

Way forward: Notify Nano-Safety Guidelines under EPA 1986; mandatory labelling of food/cosmetics; expand Nano Mission Phase III with industry co-funding.

Key points
  • Nano Mission Phase II ₹1,000 crore (DST 2014)
  • India 3rd globally in nano publications (Scopus 2024)
  • Nano-urea by IFFCO commercialised June 2021
  • Quantum dots — Nobel Chemistry 2023
  • FSSAI nano-safety guidelines pending
  • Centres of Excellence at IISc, JNCASR

Open full model answer →