Opens in a new tab
Join Anantam IAS Channel on Telegram

GS 2 · Practice archive

GS Paper 2 practice questions for UPSC Mains 2026.

Polity, Constitution, Governance, Social Justice and International Relations.

20 Qs / 250 marks426 questionsModel outlines included

GS Paper 2 · Tips & tricks

GS-2 — anchor every claim to an article, a judgment or a body

  1. Quote the Article number first.Article 200, Article 356, Article 14 — naming the constitutional provision in the first line of the body signals competence.
  2. Pair a judgment with the principle it laid down.S.R. Bommai (federalism), Kesavananda Bharati (basic structure), Vishaka (workplace harassment) — use them as shorthand, not lectures.
  3. Use the institution's real name.Not "election body" — Election Commission of India. Not "human rights body" — National Human Rights Commission. Not "the audit body" — CAG.
  4. For Governance, cite a real scheme + a real number.PM-KISAN beneficiaries, Aadhaar coverage %, MGNREGA person-days, DBT savings — concrete metrics anchor your point.
  5. IR answers need three verbs: convergence, divergence, balance.Every bilateral relationship has all three. Show all three in the same answer.
Q.115 marks · 250w 14 min Medium

Legislative Councils occupy an uncomfortable constitutional space that is they are too weak to check, too costly to justify, too political to reform. Do you agree?

Subtopic: Polity and Governance

Show model answer outline
Introduction → Under Article 169, Parliament may create or → The constitutional position of Vidhan → “On ordinary Bills, it can delay legislation → There is no joint sitting mechanism, no → The fiscal charge has empirical support → Conclusion
Key points
  • Under Article 169, Parliament may create or abolish a Legislative Council by ordinary law, but only after the State Assembly passes a resolution by
  • The constitutional position of Vidhan Parishads under Articles 168–171 is structurally subordinate to the Assembly in ways that Rajya Sabha is not
  • “On ordinary Bills, it can delay legislation for a maximum of about four months; on Money Bills, only fourteen days.”
  • There is no joint sitting mechanism, no equal legislative power, and no absolute veto
  • The fiscal charge has empirical support: the Uttar Pradesh Vidhan Parishad, with 100 members, costs an estimated ₹150–200 crore annually while sitting
  • Maharashtra's Council has been documented sitting fewer than 20 days in several recent years
  • “The fiscal criticism is relevant because Councils require salaries, pensions, infrastructure and secretariat expenditure despite having limited

Open full model answer →

Q.215 marks · 250w 14 min Hard

“The President of India exercises no real discretion — only the illusion of it.” Critically examine this claim.

Subtopic: Polity and Governance

Show model answer outline
Introduction → Aid and advice is binding → The President may return advice once, but if → Article 75(1) → Article 111 → Conclusion
Key points
  • Aid and advice is binding: In routine governance, the President cannot act independently of Cabinet advice
  • Appointments, diplomatic functions, ordinances, assent to most Bills, emergency proclamations and clemency are formally presidential but substantially
  • The President may return advice once, but if reiterated, must accept it
  • Article 75(1): Appointment of Prime Minister: In a hung Lok Sabha, discretion becomes real: the President must invite the person most likely to command
  • Article 111: returning a Bill: The President may return a non-Money Bill once for reconsideration
  • Pocket veto: Since no time limit is prescribed for assent, the President may delay action
  • Article 143 reference: The President may refer constitutional questions to the Supreme Court

Open full model answer →

Q.315 marks · 250w 14 min Medium

Identify the five most consequential reforms that could restore Parliament’s primacy without altering the Constitution. Justify your selection.

Subtopic: Polity and Governance

Show model answer outline
Introduction → Sitting days collapsed → Committee referral abandoned → Privilege weaponised → Accountability instruments eroded → Anti-defection structural capture → Conclusion
Key points
  • Sitting days collapsed: 17th Lok Sabha averaged 55 sitting days annually — fewest among all full-term Lok Sabhas; the UK Parliament sits 150–170 days; the
  • Committee referral abandoned: Bills referred to DRSCs fell from 71% (14th LS) to 16% (17th LS) lowest since DRSCs were created in 1993; 35% of bills
  • Privilege weaponised: 146 MPs suspended in Winter Session 2023 largest mass suspension in Lok Sabha history, enabling passage of BNS, BNSS, and BSA
  • Accountability instruments eroded: Ministerial suo-motu statements fell 71% over a decade (98 in 15th LS → 28 in 17th LS); no Private Member's Bill has
  • Anti-defection structural capture: The Tenth Schedule has converted MPs into party instruments, individual legislative conscience is constitutionally
  • Anti-defection law reform: The Tenth Schedule's absolute bar on voting against party whip eliminates intra-party legislative deliberation as a check on
  • Deputy Speaker (enforceable constitutional obligation): Article 93's "shall choose" is judicially unenforceable as an internal parliamentary matter

Open full model answer →

Q.415 marks · 250w 14 min Medium

“Reforming the Indian judiciary requires more than judicial reform; it requires restructuring the wider justice system. Discuss.”

Subtopic: Polity and Governance

Show model answer outline
Introduction → 43% conviction rate (NCRB 2022) → Prosecution without independence → 331 HC vacancies (2024) and 5.4 crore → 131% prison occupancy (NCRB 2022) → Conclusion
Key points
  • 43% conviction rate (NCRB 2022): shoddy charge-sheets from an investigation system still governed by the Police Act of 1861; Prakash Singh v
  • Prosecution without independence: public prosecutors are state government employees; Section 321 BNSS withdrawal power drops politically inconvenient
  • 331 HC vacancies (2024) and 5.4 crore pending cases: structural shortage compounded by an adjournment culture the CPC Amendment (2002) attempted but
  • 131% prison occupancy (NCRB 2022): undertrials sharing cells with convicts; Re: Inhuman Conditions in 1382 Prisons monitored for years without structural
  • 50% of all cases involve government as a litigant: the National Litigation Policy (2010) aimed to make government a responsible litigant; the Law
  • Appointments transparency: Collegium must publish eligibility criteria and diversity targets
  • Malimath Committee (2003) recommended a National Judicial Commission; the ICJ (2025) recommended a statutory JAC with a competency framework — the SC need

Open full model answer →

Q.515 marks · 250w 14 min Hard

The Supreme Court of India is overburdened because it functions simultaneously as a constitutional court and a regular court of appeal. Examine the case for structural reform.

Subtopic: Polity and Governance

Show model answer outline
Introduction → From Constitutional Court to Regular Appellate Court → India can follow a phased approach → Conclusion
Key points
  • Constitutional matters displaced: PRS Legislative Research data shows that over 60% of the SC's workload consists of SLPs, and that too mostly civil and
  • Geographic injustice: The SC admits less than 1% of SLPs filed from remote states (PRS data) meaning litigants from Tamil Nadu, Kerala, the Northeast, and
  • High Courts diminished: Article 136 has turned High Courts into intermediate courts rather than final constitutional courts within their territories
  • The Law Commission's 229th Report recommended separating the SC's constitutional and appellate roles:
  • Immediate (no constitutional amendment required): Art
  • Medium term: Permanent subject-wise Constitution Benches (taxation, federal disputes, criminal law) to ensure constitutional questions are heard promptly
  • Long term: National Court of Appeal by statute if constitutional consensus emerges to hear all routine appeals with SC jurisdiction restricted to

Open full model answer →

Q.615 marks · 250w 14 min Hard

A constitutional office may be weakened not by abolition, but by nonappointment. Examine with reference to the office of the Deputy Speaker of the Lok Sabha.

Subtopic: Polity and Governance

Show model answer outline
Introduction → Art. 93 a mandatory constitutional direction → Art. 95(1) → Convention → The constitutional vacuum ( no judicial → Functional impairment → Conclusion
Key points
  • Art. 93 a mandatory constitutional direction: The phrase "shall choose" in Article 93 is imperative, not enabling as it creates a constitutional
  • Art. 95(1): The Deputy Speaker presides when the Speaker is absent, chairs committees, and crucially, under Article 95(1), exercises all the Speaker's
  • Convention: allocated the Deputy Speakership to the principal Opposition party This convention operationalised the constitutional design's separation of
  • The constitutional vacuum ( no judicial remedy): The SC in Sanjay Singh v
  • Functional impairment: The Deputy Speaker chairs the most consequential parliamentary committees including the Business Advisory Committee during the
  • Anti-defection law and the Speaker's partisanship problem:
  • PRS Legislative Research documented that the 17th Lok Sabha holds the record for the fewest sittings among full-term Lok Sabhas (274 total) and the lowest

Open full model answer →

Q.715 marks · 250w 14 min Hard

Judicial independence is a basic feature of the Constitution, but independence without accountability risks becoming institutional opacity. Examine.

Subtopic: Polity and Governance

Show model answer outline
Introduction → Salaries, allowances, and pensions of SC → Appointment Process Third Judges Case → Conclusion
Key points
  • Security of tenure — Articles 124(2) and 217(1):
  • Salaries, allowances, and pensions of SC judges are charged to the Consolidated Fund of India — not subject to Parliamentary vote
  • It cannot be reduced to the disadvantage of a judge after appointment (Art
  • Parliamentary discussion of the conduct of SC or HC judges in the discharge of their duties is constitutionally prohibited (Art
  • Appointment Process Third Judges Case (Presidential Reference, 1998) established that the CJI and four senior-most SC judges collectively control judicial
  • Collegium opacity (self-selection without criteria or transparency):
  • without open advertisement of vacancies, and without a structured competency framework, compromised diversity

Open full model answer →

Q.815 marks · 250w 14 min Medium

India’s next delimitation exercise will test not merely arithmetic representation, but the political morality of federalism. Discuss.

Subtopic: Polity and Governance

Show model answer outline
Introduction → Constitutional Provisions → OP OV) → Delink Women's Reservation from delimitation → Conclusion
Key points
  • Article 82 mandates readjustment of Lok Sabha seats after every census
  • The next delimitation, expected after the 2026 census, does not merely ask how many seats each state deserves
  • The constitutional mandate under Arts
  • Bihar's TFR stands at 3.0; Tamil Nadu's at 1.8, below replacement level
  • If seats are reallocated on 2021 Census figures, UP gains approximately 20 additional seats; Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Karnataka, and Andhra Pradesh
  • The freeze that protected southern states from losing seats has simultaneously created over-representation that democratic arithmetic cannot indefinitely
  • A Lok Sabha constituency in Kerala represents approximately 1.8 million people; one in Uttar Pradesh approximately 2.5 million, a distortion that

Open full model answer →

Q.915 marks · 250w 14 min Hard

Basic Structure Doctrine is not a bar on change, but is a device that keeps Constitutional change constitutional hence enabling peaceful social transformation without allowing constitutional self-destruction. Critically examine.

Subtopic: Polity and Governance

Show model answer outline
Introduction → Issues with BSD → Supreme → Court → Advocates-on-Record → Basic Structure scrutiny → Conclusion
Key points
  • Court held this expanded, not violated, the equality principle; Art
  • Women's Reservation Act (106th Amendment, 2023): not challenged on Basic Structure grounds because it enriches representation rather than undermines the
  • Basic Structure as judicial veto: The doctrine has no exhaustive definition — the SC has never provided a complete, closed list of Basic Structure
  • Basic Structure gives the SC the power to override a constitutional amendment passed by a two-thirds majority in both Houses ratified by half the state
  • for which the Constitution's text provides no explicit authority
  • Legitimate transformation delayed: Amendment uncertainty
  • Art. 370 abrogation (In Re: Article 370, 2023) — SC upheld the abrogation but the 5-judge bench's reasoning implicitly acknowledged significant

Open full model answer →

Q.1015 marks · 250w 14 min Hard

The Finance Commission is no longer merely a tax-sharing body; it is increasingly shaping the behaviour of States. Examine in the light of recent Finance Commission recommendations.

Subtopic: Polity and Governance

Show model answer outline
Introduction → 15th FC introduced "Tax and Fiscal Efforts" → 16th FC replaced fiscal efforts with "GDP → 16th FC conditioned ₹7.91 lakh crore → The FC has used grant architecture to → DISCOM privatisation (sectoral reform as → Conclusion
Key points
  • 15th FC introduced "Tax and Fiscal Efforts" (2.5%) and "Demographic Performance" (12.5%): embedding governance incentives into devolution arithmetic itself
  • 16th FC replaced fiscal efforts with "GDP Contribution" (10%): rewarding economic governance choices; states now manage policy with one eye permanently on
  • 16th FC conditioned ₹7.91 lakh crore (largest ever local body allocation) on three entry-level conditions  constituted local bodies,  published audited
  • The FC has used grant architecture to enforce Art
  • DISCOM privatisation (sectoral reform as grant condition): 16th FC conditioned Special Assistance for Capital Investment funds on completion of DISCOM
  • 16th FC directed standardised subsidy accounting, clear beneficiary exclusion criteria, and prohibition of off-budget subsidy financing
  • 16th FC recommended closure of 308 inactive SPSEs and formulation of state PSE disinvestment policy — directing state economic institutional choices that

Open full model answer →

Q.1115 marks · 250w 14 min Medium

Should the Sixth Schedule model be extended beyond the North-East to protect fragile ecological and cultural regions? Discuss with reference to Ladakh.

Subtopic: Polity and Governance

Show model answer outline
Introduction → Existing Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development → Ladakh loses approximately 0.5m of glacier → Financial dependence → No skilled professionals → Conclusion
Key points
  • Existing Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Councils (Leh 1995, Kargil 2003) are statutory bodies under ordinary law: no constitutional protection, no
  • Ladakh loses approximately 0.5m of glacier thickness annually (ISRO data) — the Indus river system supplying millions downstream originates here; mass
  • Buddhist monasteries (Hemis, Thikse), Ladakhi pastoral traditions (nomadic Changpa yak-herding rights), customary water rights (phat system), and pastoral
  • Financial dependence: All existing ADCs are fiscally dependent on state governments (or Centre for UTs) — legislative autonomy without fiscal independence
  • No skilled professionals: ADCs lack planning professionals, financial analysts, and environmental specialists — development projects conceived ad hoc
  • Customary law uncodified: No existing ADC has successfully codified customary law in legally operable form; Ladakhi phat water rights, staq pastoral
  • Sixth Schedule with UT-specific modification: Amend the Sixth Schedule to create a Ladakh-specific para — mandatory 30-day LG assent timeline; Parliament

Open full model answer →

Q.1215 marks · 250w 14 min Medium

Public Interest Litigation has democratised access to justice, but it has also expanded judicial power into domains of governance. Discuss.

Subtopic: Polity and Governance

Show model answer outline
Introduction → Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. UoI (1984) → Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997) → MC Mehta v. UoI (1986–ongoing) → NALSA v. UoI (2014) → Investigative supervision → Conclusion
Key points
  • Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. UoI (1984): SC ordered release of bonded labourers in Faridabad quarries; executive had not enforced the Bonded Labour System
  • Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997): SC framed binding workplace sexual harassment guidelines after Bhanwari Devi's rape went unpunished; Parliament
  • MC Mehta v. UoI (1986–ongoing): closed 292 polluting Delhi industries; mandated CNG public transport; established "polluter pays" and "precautionary
  • NALSA v. UoI (2014): SC recognised transgender persons as third gender, directing welfare measures — a rights-creation exercise Parliament had not
  • Investigative supervision: Vineet Narain v
  • Private body governance: BCCI v
  • Policy prescription: MC Mehta (Taj Trapezium, 1996) — SC directed closure of industries within 10,500 sq km around Taj Mahal using criteria developed by

Open full model answer →

Q.1315 marks · 250w 14 min Medium

The Governor under the Constitution has no functions which he can discharge by himself: no functions at all. While he has no functions, he has certain duties to perform. How far do you agree?

Subtopic: Polity and Governance

Show model answer outline
Introduction → Appointment of Chief Minister (Art → Presidential Reference (In Re → Discretion as Chancellor — university → Legislative functions → Conclusion
Key points
  • Appointment of Chief Minister (Art
  • Presidential Reference (In Re: Assent, November 2025) — Constitution Bench codified these timelines into constitutionally authoritative framework;
  • Discretion as Chancellor — university governance As ex-officio Chancellor, the Governor retains VC appointment powers not governed by Cabinet advice —
  • Legislative functions: Addressing the Assembly (Art

Open full model answer →

Q.1415 marks · 250w 14 min Hard

The real constitution of Indian federalism is not written in Articles 245 to 263 but in the structure of the party system at any given moment.” Critically examine.

Subtopic: Polity and Governance

Show model answer outline
Introduction → Rajni Kothari's "Congress system" → 1967 elections — the hinge moment → No single party won a Lok Sabha majority → "Cooperative federalism" was the rebranding → BJP won 240 seats — coalition-dependent on → Conclusion
Key points
  • Rajni Kothari's "Congress system": Federalism conducted within the party organisation — Pradesh Congress Committees negotiated with the High Command
  • 1967 elections — the hinge moment: Congress lost power in 9 states simultaneously; constitutional instruments held in reserve — Art
  • No single party won a Lok Sabha majority between 1989 and 2014; regional parties extracted fiscal, legislative, and administrative concessions for
  • "Cooperative federalism" was the rebranding — NITI Aayog (no statutory powers), GST Council (Centre's concurrence required); Tanvir Aeijaz termed this
  • BJP won 240 seats — coalition-dependent on TDP (16 seats) and JDU (12 seats); coalition compulsion partially returned; ONOE Bills referred to JPC; 18th LS
  • Geographic centralisation excludes the most vulnerable: SC admits less than 1% of SLPs from remote states; a tribal litigant from Jharkhand must travel to
  • Mediation Act 2023: pre-litigation mediation mandatory for commercial disputes; Mediation Council of India for accreditation; online mediation recognised;

Open full model answer →

Q.1515 marks · 250w 14 min Hard

Decentralisation without accountability produces not local democracy but local autocracy. In light of this, critically assess the functioning of Gram Sabha as a democratic institution in India.

Subtopic: Polity and Governance

Show model answer outline
Introduction → Functions include approving the Panchayat → Few states have made Gram Sabha decisions → Kerala model — the gold standard → Andhra Pradesh — RTI-led social audit model → These positive examples share a feature → Conclusion
Key points
  • Functions include approving the Panchayat budget, preparing audit reports, selecting scheme beneficiaries, and maintaining vigilance over Panchayat
  • Few states have made Gram Sabha decisions binding on Panchayats — it remains advisory rather than decisional in most states; the constitutional functions
  • Kerala model — the gold standard: Minimum 4 Gram Sabhas per year mandated
  • Andhra Pradesh — RTI-led social audit model: in MGNREGA Gram Sabhas — payment lists, worker muster rolls, and grievance records read publicly before
  • These positive examples share a feature: state governments that provided functional backing — funds, legal authority, and administrative support — to Gram
  • Elite capture — the most systematic failure:
  • Sarpanch Pati phenomenon — gender exclusion within inclusion:

Open full model answer →

Q.1615 marks · 250w 14 min Medium

Assess the role of formal and informal pressure groups in Indian democracy, with particular reference to their methods of influence and the regulatory vacuum they operate in.

Subtopic: Polity and Governance

Show model answer outline
Introduction → Role in Indian democracy → Social media as equaliser → PIL as informal pressure tool → Conclusion
Key points
  • Direct lobbying: CII and FICCI submit pre-Budget memoranda annually
  • Parliamentary channel: Parliamentary Standing Committee depositions allow formal pressure groups to directly shape legislative recommendations
  • Policy expertise provision: FICCI's economic modelling informs Budget decisions
  • Watchdog function: PUCL (People's Union for Civil Liberties) and ADR (Association for Democratic Reforms) function as watchdogs on civil liberties and
  • Electoral pressure: The most powerful informal mechanism in Indian democracy
  • Mass mobilisation and agitation: Farmers' protest (2020–21) — Samyukta Kisan Morcha was an umbrella of 500+ farmer organisations, many informal; used
  • Twitter/X campaigns during CAA protests (2019–20); #MeToo movement forcing POSH Act awareness

Open full model answer →

Q.1715 marks · 250w 14 min Hard

In light of recent judicial pronouncements and empirical evidence, critically examine the state of tribunals in India and the path to their reform.

Subtopic: Polity and Governance

Show model answer outline
Introduction → Rationale → Pendency — the scale of failure → Chronic vacancies — the operational paralysis → "Parking spots" for retired officials — → Jurisdictional overlaps and fragmentation → Conclusion
Key points
  • Rationale: three original promises:
  • Pendency — the scale of failure: In 2024–25, at least ₹24.72 lakh crore worth of disputes — approximately 7.48% of India's GDP — remain locked in disputes
  • Chronic vacancies — the operational paralysis:
  • "Parking spots" for retired officials — Generalization of Expert bodies:
  • Jurisdictional overlaps and fragmentation:
  • Tribunals Reforms Act 2021: Maintained executive dominance over appointments through Search-cum- Selection Committees with significant government
  • Merging of tribunals with overlapping mandates (Film Certificate Appellate Tribunal merged with HC; Airport Appellate Tribunal dissolved) reduced the

Open full model answer →

Q.1815 marks · 250w 14 min Hard

Centrally Sponsored Schemes, conceived under Article 282 as a fiscal bridge between Centre and states, have increasingly become a fiscal rope tethering states to Central policy preferences rather than bridging developmental gaps. Critically examine.

Subtopic: Polity and Governance

Show model answer outline
Introduction → Conditionality as policy coercion (CSS → Unspent funds and Centre's 2025 CSS outlay → Resource-expenditure asymmetry — states pay → Erosion of fiscal autonomy → CSS are justified where national minimum → Conclusion
Key points
  • Conditionality as policy coercion (CSS conditionality converting cooperative federalism into compliance enforcement)
  • Unspent funds and Centre's 2025 CSS outlay cut: While states with genuine developmental needs go under-served; the unspent fund accumulation is a
  • Resource-expenditure asymmetry — states pay more, control less:
  • Erosion of fiscal autonomy (one-size-fits-all design): CSSs have strict fund utilisation conditions, limiting states' flexibility to adapt them to local
  • CSS are justified where national minimum standards require Central enforcement
  • The Centre's position on PM SHRI — that education is a Concurrent List subject and Central standards require national consistency — is constitutionally
  • NITI Aayog working group (2025) on CSS rationalisation represents a goodfaith effort to reduce the number and improve the targeting of CSS — the revamp

Open full model answer →

Q.1915 marks · 250w 14 min Hard

The Citizens’ Charter was conceived as a compact between the state and the citizen, yet a decade of evidence shows a persistent gap between commitments and outcomes. Identify the structural reasons for this failure and evaluate whether the Right to Service Acts enacted by states offer a more credible alternative.

Subtopic: Polity and Governance

Show model answer outline
Introduction → Case Study → Ex → Conclusion
Key points
  • Voluntary architecture with no legal teeth: The Charter remains an administrative instrument, not a statutory obligation
  • Absence of citizen participation in charter formulation: Charters are drafted by the departments they are meant to discipline
  • No independent grievance redressal authority — Complaints under the Charter are routed back to the same department whose failure triggered the complaint
  • Accountability deficit of frontline staff — Charter commitments are made at the organisational level but delivered at the counter level
  • Rajasthan's model introduced a deemed approval provision: if the competent authority fails to decide within the stipulated timeline, the application is
  • Karnataka's Sakala scheme (2012): covering 800+ services across 63 departments with SMS-based tracking represents the most comprehensive digital
  • Right to Service Acts enacted by 16+ states represent a genuine constitutional upgrade — they convert the Charter's moral commitment into a statutory

Open full model answer →

Q.2015 marks · 250w 14 min Medium

Domain specialisation in the civil services has been recommended by committees since the First ARC (1966), yet implementation remains partial and contested. Analyse the causes of this persistent gap between recommendation and reform, and assess the consequences for India’s development outcomes.

Subtopic: Polity and Governance

Show model answer outline
Introduction → The generalist as political utility — The → Implementation was always deferred, never → No statutory backing — Domain assignment → Seniority-based promotion rewards → The IAS controls its own reform → Conclusion
Key points
  • The generalist as political utility — The IAS generalist officer is more useful to the political executive precisely because generalism enables posting
  • Implementation was always deferred, never designed — The Government of India implemented domain assignment at 18 years of service (Second ARC recommended
  • No statutory backing — Domain assignment operates through executive order, not statute
  • Seniority-based promotion rewards time-serving over expertise: an IAS officer who spends 30 years rotating across unrelated departments gets promoted
  • The IAS controls its own reform: the officers who would lose posting flexibility under domain specialisation are the same officers who advise ministers on
  • Domain assignment at 18 years means the officer specialises after the damage is done: the most consequential postings (district collector, joint
  • India's infrastructure deficit is partly a generalist deficit: (generalist secretaries approving technically complex DPRs ) NITI Aayog's 2023

Open full model answer →