Opens in a new tab
Join Anantam IAS Channel on Telegram

TOPIC

India and USA Relations

2 UPSC Prelims MCQs tagged "India and USA Relations". Free practice with answer keys, explanations, and timed mock tests on Anantam IAS.

  1. In the Indian context, what is the implication of ratifying the ‘Additional Protocol’ with…

    In the Indian context, what is the implication of ratifying the 'Additional Protocol' with the 'International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)'?

    1. AThe civilian nuclear reactors come under IAEA safeguards.
    2. BThe military nuclear installations come under the inspection of IAEA.
    3. CThe country will have the privilege to buy uranium from the Nuclear Suppliers Group NSG.
    4. DThe country automatically becomes a member of the NSG.
    Answer and explanation

    Correct answer: A

    The 'Additional Protocol' is a legal document that grants the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) expanded rights of access to information and locations in a state to ensure that nuclear materials are used for peaceful purposes.

    * Option A is correct: By ratifying the Additional Protocol, India committed to placing its civilian nuclear facilities under IAEA safeguards. This allows the IAEA to verify that nuclear material in these specific facilities is not diverted for military use. * Option B is incorrect: India maintains a separation between its civilian and military nuclear programs. The Additional Protocol applies only to civilian facilities; military installations remain outside the scope of IAEA inspections. * Options C and D are incorrect: While the ratification of the Additional Protocol was a significant step in India's integration into the global nuclear order (following the Indo-US nuclear deal), it does not automatically grant membership to the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) or provide an automatic privilege to buy uranium. Membership in the NSG requires a separate consensus-based admission process.

    India signed the Additional Protocol in 2009, and it officially entered into force on July 25, 2014.

  2. Consider the following statements: 1. The Nuclear Security Summits are periodically held under the…

    Consider the following statements: 1. The Nuclear Security Summits are periodically held under the aegis of the United Nations. 2. The International Panel on Fissile Materials is an organ of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    1. A1 only
    2. B2 only
    3. CBoth 1 and 2
    4. DNeither 1 nor 2
    Answer and explanation

    Correct answer: D

    Statement 1 is incorrect. The Nuclear Security Summits were not held under the UN. They were a series of international conferences initiated by the United States in 2010, outside of any formal international organisation. The summits brought together world leaders to discuss ways to secure nuclear materials and prevent nuclear proliferation. However, the summits haven't been held since 2016.

    Statement 2 is incorrect. The International Panel on Fissile Materials (IPFM) is an independent group of arms control and non-proliferation experts. It's not an organ of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). While the IAEA might collaborate with the IPFM on some issues, it's a separate entity.