Opens in a new tab
Join Anantam IAS Channel on Telegram

GS 2 · Practice archive

GS Paper 2 practice questions for UPSC Mains 2026.

Polity, Constitution, Governance, Social Justice and International Relations.

20 Qs / 250 marks426 questionsModel outlines included

GS Paper 2 · Tips & tricks

GS-2 — anchor every claim to an article, a judgment or a body

  1. Quote the Article number first.Article 200, Article 356, Article 14 — naming the constitutional provision in the first line of the body signals competence.
  2. Pair a judgment with the principle it laid down.S.R. Bommai (federalism), Kesavananda Bharati (basic structure), Vishaka (workplace harassment) — use them as shorthand, not lectures.
  3. Use the institution's real name.Not "election body" — Election Commission of India. Not "human rights body" — National Human Rights Commission. Not "the audit body" — CAG.
  4. For Governance, cite a real scheme + a real number.PM-KISAN beneficiaries, Aadhaar coverage %, MGNREGA person-days, DBT savings — concrete metrics anchor your point.
  5. IR answers need three verbs: convergence, divergence, balance.Every bilateral relationship has all three. Show all three in the same answer.
Q.115 marks · 250w 14 min Easy

“The Attorney-General is the chief legal adviser and lawyer of the Government of India.” Discuss.

Subtopic: Constitution & Polity · Attorney-General of India

Show model answer outline
Introduction → Article 76: appointment, qualification, tenure during pleasure → Role as chief legal adviser to the Government → Role as the government's lawyer: right of audience, Article 143 references, Article 88 rights → Limitations: private practice conditions, non-Cabinet status, conventions → Conclusion
Key points
  • Article 76: appointed by the President; must be qualified to be a Supreme Court judge; holds office during the President's pleasure; remuneration as the President determines.
  • Advises the Government on legal matters referred by the President and performs assigned duties of a legal character.
  • Right of audience in all courts (Article 76(3)); represents the Union in Supreme Court cases and Article 143 references.
  • Article 88: may speak in either House and parliamentary committees without voting; enjoys MP privileges under Article 105(4).
  • Conventional restrictions: no advice or brief against the Government, no defence of criminal accused or company directorship without permission.
  • Not a Cabinet member; conventionally resigns with the government — a political appointment carrying professional obligations of independence.

Open full model answer →

Q.215 marks · 250w 14 min Medium

Individual Parliamentarian’s role as the national law maker is on a decline, which in turn, has adversely impacted the quality of debates and their outcome. Discuss.

Subtopic: Constitution & Polity · Parliament and the decline of the individual MP

Show model answer outline
Introduction → Evidence of decline: sittings, committee referrals, hurried passage, private members' bills → Causes: anti-defection and whip culture, executive dominance, weak research support → Consequences for debate quality and law-making outcomes → Correctives: whip reform, default committee referral, minimum sittings → Conclusion
Key points
  • The Tenth Schedule plus routine whips convert MPs into party delegates; dissent invites disqualification.
  • Bills referred to committees fell from 71 per cent (15th Lok Sabha) to about 16 per cent (17th) — PRS data.
  • Sitting days have nearly halved since the 1950s and Question Hour is routinely lost to disruption.
  • Only 14 private members' bills have ever passed; none since 1970 — the individual legislative initiative is dead in practice.
  • Ordinances, guillotine and the money-bill route (Aadhaar Act, 2016) bypass deliberation.
  • 170th Law Commission Report and NCRWC recommend restricting the whip to confidence motions.
  • Weak research support and money-and-muscle candidature erode legislative craft and debate quality.

Open full model answer →

Q.315 marks · 250w 14 min Hard

‘In the context of neo-liberal paradigm of development planning, multi-level planning is expected to make operations cost-effective and remove many implementation blockages.’ — Discuss.

Subtopic: Governance · multi-level planning in the neo-liberal era

Show model answer outline
Introduction → The neo-liberal paradigm: state as facilitator, indicative planning → How multi-level planning yields cost-effectiveness: local information, convergence, competitive federalism → How it removes blockages: 73rd/74th machinery, GPDP, Gati Shakti → The gap: weak devolution, dormant DPCs, capacity deficits → Conclusion
Key points
  • Post-1991 planning is indicative and outcome-oriented; NITI Aayog replaced the Planning Commission's allocative role.
  • The core efficiency claim: local information improves targeting and cuts leakages that centralised schemes suffer.
  • GPDP under 'Sabki Yojana Sabka Vikas' converges schemes and Fifteenth Finance Commission grants at the village level.
  • The Aspirational Districts Programme and SDG India Index institutionalise competitive federalism as an efficiency device.
  • District Planning Committees under Article 243ZD should integrate rural-urban plans but remain dormant in most states.
  • Kerala's People's Plan Campaign (1996), devolving roughly a third of plan funds, is the standing proof of concept.
  • Incomplete devolution of funds, functions and functionaries plus fiscal centralisation (cesses, surcharges) block realisation.

Open full model answer →

Q.415 marks · 250w 14 min Medium

The need for cooperation among various service sectors has been an inherent component of development discourse. Partnership bridges the gap among the sectors. It also sets in motion a culture of ‘collaboration’ and ‘team spirit’. In the light of statements above examine India’s development process.

Subtopic: Governance · partnerships in India's development process

Show model answer outline
Introduction → Partnership as a development method across service sectors → Sectoral evidence: finance and digital, health, education and skilling, infrastructure, community institutions → The collaboration culture: cooperative federalism, mission mode → Frictions: PPP disputes, NGO trust deficit → Conclusion
Key points
  • The JAM trinity and UPI show state-market-technology collaboration producing population-scale services.
  • PM-JAY's private hospital empanelment and the Covishield-CoWIN combination demonstrate co-production in health.
  • NSDC skilling and PM POSHAN with Akshaya Patra illustrate PPP and civil-society roles in human capital.
  • DAY-NRLM's SHG-bank linkage mobilising nearly ten crore households is community-finance partnership at scale.
  • The GST Council and PM Gati Shakti institutionalise collaboration across governments and ministries.
  • The Kelkar Committee flagged PPP risk mis-allocation; FCRA tightening strained NGO partnerships — team spirit needs trust and fair contracts.

Open full model answer →

Q.515 marks · 250w 14 min Medium

Performance of welfare schemes that are implemented for vulnerable sections is not so effective due to absence of their awareness and active involvement at all stages of policy process. — Discuss.

Subtopic: Social Justice · welfare delivery, awareness and participation

Show model answer outline
Introduction → How lack of awareness produces unclaimed benefits, exclusion errors and elite capture → The cost of missing participation at design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation stages → Evidence that participation works: social audits, Kudumbashree, Jan Soochna → Way forward: saturation outreach, statutory audits, SHG-led IEC → Conclusion
Key points
  • Awareness gaps leave entitlements unclaimed — uptake of maternity benefits and social-security insurance runs well below eligibility.
  • Aadhaar authentication failures among manual workers and the elderly show what design without beneficiary consultation costs.
  • MGNREGA social audits (SSAAT in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana) recovered misappropriated funds — community monitoring works.
  • Kudumbashree and Village Health, Sanitation and Nutrition Committees prove community institutions improve last-mile delivery.
  • Jan Soochna Portal and Viksit Bharat Sankalp Yatra are scalable models of proactive disclosure and saturation outreach.
  • Fix: statutory social audit units, IEC through SHG networks in local dialects, simplified portable entitlements, and Gram Sabha space for vulnerable groups.

Open full model answer →

Q.615 marks · 250w 14 min Medium

‘The long-sustained image of India as a leader of the oppressed and marginalised nations has disappeared on account of its new found role in the emerging global order.’ Elaborate.

Subtopic: International Relations · India and the Global South

Show model answer outline
Introduction → The old image: Bandung, NAM, G-77, anti-apartheid leadership → Why it faded: US and Israel intimacy, NAM neglect, interest-first multi-alignment → Continuity recast: Voice of Global South, AU in G20, Vaccine Maitri, development partnership → Assessment: bridging power, not abandonment → Conclusion
Key points
  • India's old leadership rested on Bandung (1955), NAM's founding (1961), the G-77 and advocacy of a New International Economic Order.
  • Perceived departure: the Quad and US foundational agreements, deepening Israel ties, and prime ministerial absences from NAM summits (2016, 2019).
  • Multi-alignment privileges national interest — RCEP exit and sanction-era energy purchases are read as transactionalism.
  • The 2023 G20 presidency delivered structural voice for the South: admission of the African Union.
  • Vaccine Maitri to about 100 countries, Operation Dost and nearly USD 4 billion for Sri Lanka built first-responder credentials.
  • Development partnership — ITEC, USD 30 billion-plus lines of credit, DPI sharing — plus WTO battles on food security and the TRIPS waiver sustain the leadership claim.
  • Assessment: leadership re-negotiated from moral spokesman to capability-backed bridging power.

Open full model answer →

Q.715 marks · 250w 14 min Hard

‘What introduces friction into the ties between India and the United States is that Washington is still unable to find for India a position in its global strategy, which would satisfy India’s national self-esteem and ambitions.’ Explain with suitable examples.

Subtopic: International Relations · India–US strategic friction

Show model answer outline
Introduction (Major Defence Partner yet recurring friction) → US slots India instrumentally in its China strategy → friction: GSP withdrawal, tariff wars, CAATSA/S-400, Iran sanctions, Pakistan factor, H-1B → declaratory support for UNSC/NSG vs India's multipolar ambitions → countervailing convergence: foundational pacts, Quad, iCET → Conclusion (accommodate India as an equal, autonomous power)
Key points
  • US strategy values India mainly as a counterweight to China (Indo-Pacific, Quad) rather than as an autonomous pole — the root of the status mismatch.
  • Trade friction: GSP withdrawal (June 2019), 'tariff king' rhetoric and punitive 2025 tariffs linked to India's Russian oil purchases.
  • CAATSA threats over the S-400 and secondary sanctions that ended Iranian oil imports show US domestic law constraining Indian strategic choices.
  • Washington's transactional reliance on Pakistan, especially in Afghan diplomacy, has repeatedly grated on Indian sensitivities.
  • US backing for India's UNSC permanent seat and NSG membership remains declaratory; H-1B curbs strain the human bridge between the two economies.
  • Convergence is real — LEMOA, COMCASA, BECA, STA-1, iCET — but alliance-style US expectations clash with India's strategic autonomy.
  • Durability requires the US to accommodate India's self-image: technology sharing, trade stability and support for reformed multilateralism.

Open full model answer →

Q.810 marks · 150w 9 min Medium

“There is a need for simplification of procedure for disqualification of persons found guilty of corrupt practices under the Representation of Peoples Act”. Comment.

Subtopic: Constitution & Polity · Representation of the People Act

Show model answer outline
Introduction (Section 123 corrupt practices; Section 8A disqualification) → election petition delays despite the six-month mandate → post-Section 99 Presidential–ECI stage stalls disqualification → appeals and stays destroy deterrence → reforms: automatic disqualification, election benches, 244th Report → Conclusion (swift certainty to purify elections)
Key points
  • Section 123, RPA 1951 lists corrupt practices: bribery, undue influence, appeals to religion or caste, booth capturing and publication of false statements.
  • Guilt is determined only in an election petition before the High Court; the six-month trial mandate of Section 86(7) is honoured mostly in the breach.
  • A Section 99 naming does not itself disqualify — Section 8A routes the case to the President, who acts on the Election Commission's opinion, adding a delaying stage.
  • Appeals and stays mean consequences rarely arrive within the member's term, so deterrence collapses.
  • Law Commission 244th Report (2014): expedite election-petition trials and make filing false affidavits a ground for disqualification.
  • Abhiram Singh (2017) broadened Section 123(3) on religious appeals — substantive law has tightened while procedure lags.
  • Reform direction: automatic disqualification on the High Court's finding, dedicated election benches and day-to-day trial.

Open full model answer →

Q.910 marks · 150w 9 min Medium

“Recent amendments to the Right to Information Act will have profound impact on the autonomy and independence of the Information Commission”. Discuss.

Subtopic: Governance · RTI & Information Commissions

Show model answer outline
Introduction → What the RTI (Amendment) Act, 2019 changed: tenure, salaries, coverage of State Commissions → How the changes erode autonomy and independence → Federal dimension and compounding vacancies → Government's defence and conclusion
Key points
  • RTI (Amendment) Act, 2019 replaced the fixed five-year tenure with a Centre-prescribed term (three years under the 2019 Rules).
  • Salary parity with the CEC/Election Commissioners was removed; the Centre now sets pay and conditions.
  • The Centre's rule-making power covers State Information Commissioners too — a federal intrusion into state-level adjudication.
  • Core harm: adjudicators serving on executive-revisable terms face a structural chilling effect when ruling against government.
  • Downgraded stature undermines the commissions' ability to direct senior officials and enforce penalties.
  • The amendment compounded vacancies and pendency — Anjali Bhardwaj v Union of India (2019) had already directed timely appointments.
  • Government's defence — statutory bodies need not mirror constitutional ones — does not answer the independence objection.

Open full model answer →

Q.1010 marks · 150w 9 min Medium

How far do you think cooperation, competition and confrontation have shaped the nature of federation in India? Cite some recent examples to validate your answer.

Subtopic: Constitution & Polity · federalism in practice

Show model answer outline
Introduction → Cooperation: GST Council, pandemic-era intergovernmental coordination → Competition: NITI-driven rankings and investment races → Confrontation: recent Centre-state flashpoints → Assessment: all three strands shape the federation → Conclusion
Key points
  • Frame the answer on Granville Austin's 'cooperative federalism' design versus its contested working reality.
  • Cooperation: GST Council's consensus record under Article 279A; pandemic-era PM-CM coordination and vaccine rollout.
  • Competition: NITI Aayog's rankings (SDG India Index, EoDB, Aspirational Districts) and inter-state investment bidding.
  • Confrontation: GST compensation dispute (2020), state resolutions against CAA and farm laws, Kerala's Article 131 suit.
  • Institutional friction: CBI general-consent withdrawals and Governor-state standoffs over bills (SC's 2023 Punjab Governor ruling).
  • Assessment: the three modes coexist and are not mutually exclusive — each has recent, citable instances as the question demands.
  • Way forward: regularise the Inter-State Council and zonal councils as standing dialogue mechanisms.

Open full model answer →

Q.1110 marks · 150w 9 min Hard

The judicial systems in India and UK seem to be converging as well as diverging in recent times. Highlight the key points of convergence and divergence between the two nations in terms of their judicial practices.

Subtopic: Judiciary · comparative judicial systems (India-UK)

Show model answer outline
Introduction → Shared common-law foundations → Convergence: institutional separation (UKSC), judicial review of executive action, rights adjudication and proportionality → Divergence: parliamentary sovereignty versus constitutional supremacy, appointments, remedial powers and structure → Conclusion
Key points
  • Common inheritance: common law, adversarial procedure, precedent and judicial independence bind the two systems historically.
  • Convergence 1: Constitutional Reform Act, 2005 / UK Supreme Court (2009) moved Britain toward Indian-style separation of the judiciary from the legislature.
  • Convergence 2: expanding UK judicial review of the executive — Miller (2017) and the prorogation case (2019) — mirrors Indian activism.
  • Convergence 3: proportionality and rights review under the Human Rights Act, 1998 parallels Part III adjudication; both liberalised standing and tribunalised.
  • Divergence 1: parliamentary sovereignty (declarations of incompatibility only) versus constitutional supremacy with basic-structure review in India.
  • Divergence 2: independent Judicial Appointments Commission in the UK versus India's collegium after the NJAC verdict (2015).
  • Divergence 3: India's integrated single hierarchy and Articles 32/136/142 remedies versus the UK's plural jurisdictions and narrower remedial toolkit.

Open full model answer →

Q.1210 marks · 150w 9 min Medium

‘Once a Speaker, Always a Speaker’! Do you think this practice should be adopted to impart objectivity to the office of the Speaker of Lok Sabha? What could be its implications for the robust functioning of parliamentary business in India?

Subtopic: Constitution & Polity · Speaker of Lok Sabha and impartiality of the Chair

Show model answer outline
Introduction (British convention vs Indian practice) → case for a neutral Speaker: Tenth Schedule adjudication, conduct of business → judicial concerns over partisan Speakers (Kihoto Hollohan, Keisham Meghachandra) → implications for parliamentary functioning → feasibility constraints in first-past-the-post politics → Conclusion
Key points
  • British convention: the Speaker resigns party membership and is re-elected unopposed; in India the Speaker stays a party member and contests on a party ticket, inviting doubts of partisanship.
  • Kihoto Hollohan (1992) makes the Speaker a tribunal under the Tenth Schedule, so impartiality is a constitutional expectation, not a courtesy.
  • Keisham Meghachandra Singh (2020): the Supreme Court flagged partisan delays in disqualification petitions and mooted an independent tribunal in place of the Speaker.
  • Tenth Schedule para 5 already exempts a Speaker who resigns party membership from disqualification — a route rarely used since N. Sanjiva Reddy (1967).
  • A neutral Speaker improves Opposition trust, fair time allocation and reduces disruptions and litigation over rulings.
  • Feasibility limit: first-past-the-post constituency politics makes an unopposed return unrealistic without an all-party consensus on the Speaker's seat.

Open full model answer →

Q.1310 marks · 150w 9 min Easy

In order to enhance the prospects of social development, sound and adequate health care policies are needed particularly in the fields of geriatric and maternal health care. Discuss.

Subtopic: Social Justice · health policy for vulnerable sections

Show model answer outline
Introduction (health as the base of social development; ageing and MMR data) → geriatric care: existing schemes and gaps → maternal care: schemes and outcomes → persisting challenges (anaemia, inter-state gaps, workforce) → way forward (life-cycle approach) → Conclusion
Key points
  • Frame health care as the foundation of social development (capability approach), then anchor both demands in data: elderly share to reach 20.8% by 2050 (India Ageing Report 2023).
  • MMR fell to 97 per lakh live births (SRS 2018–20) but remains above the SDG 3.1 target of 70, with wide inter-state gaps (Kerala 19 vs Assam 195).
  • Geriatric architecture: NPHCE, Rashtriya Vayoshri Yojana, Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act 2007, and Ayushman Bharat cover for all above 70 (2024).
  • Maternal continuum of care: JSY, JSSK, PMMVY, PMSMA, LaQshya, SUMAN lifted institutional deliveries to ~89% (NFHS-5).
  • Persisting gaps: 57% of women anaemic (NFHS-5), scarce palliative/dementia care, few trained geriatricians, weak old-age income security.
  • Way forward: primary-care integration, midwifery cadre, nutrition convergence, community-based elder care — a life-cycle approach to health policy.

Open full model answer →

Q.1410 marks · 150w 9 min Medium

“Institutional quality is a crucial driver of economic performance”. In this context suggest reforms in Civil Service for strengthening democracy.

Subtopic: Governance · civil services reform

Show model answer outline
Introduction (institutional quality–growth link, Douglass North) → capacity reforms (Mission Karmayogi) → neutrality and tenure (T.S.R. Subramanian directions) → performance and accountability (360-degree appraisal, FR 56(j), citizens' charters) → openness (lateral entry, specialization) → how these strengthen democracy → Conclusion
Key points
  • Open by linking the quote to institutional economics: Douglass North and Acemoglu–Robinson show institutions, not geography alone, determine economic performance; the civil service is the state's core implementing institution.
  • Capacity building: Mission Karmayogi (NPCSCB, 2020) — competency-driven, citizen-centric training and a move from rule-based to role-based work.
  • Neutrality and stability: T.S.R. Subramanian v. Union of India (2013) — fixed minimum tenure and Civil Services Boards to curb arbitrary transfers.
  • Performance management: 360-degree appraisal for empanelment, outcome-linked goals, FR 56(j) review of deadwood with due process.
  • Openness: lateral entry of domain experts (joint-secretary level since 2019) and specialization, per NITI Aayog and the 2nd ARC.
  • Democratic payoff: impartial delivery and rule of law build citizen trust — the channel through which civil service quality strengthens democracy.

Open full model answer →

Q.1510 marks · 150w 9 min Easy

“The emergence of Fourth Industrial Revolution (Digital Revolution) has initiated e-Governance as an integral part of government”. Discuss.

Subtopic: Governance · e-governance and digital public infrastructure

Show model answer outline
Introduction (defining the Fourth Industrial Revolution) → DPI backbone (Aadhaar–UPI–DigiLocker) → welfare delivery (DBT savings) → whole-of-government services (CoWIN, GeM, faceless assessment) → emerging AI layer (IndiaAI, Bhashini) → concerns (digital divide, privacy, cybersecurity) → Conclusion
Key points
  • Define 4IR (Schwab): fusion of AI, IoT, big data, cloud and mobile internet — then show it changed the *mode* of governance from discretion-heavy files to platform-based delivery.
  • DPI trinity as the backbone: Aadhaar (140 crore+), UPI (18 billion+ monthly transactions), DigiLocker — identity, payments and documents as public rails.
  • DBT has cumulatively saved over ₹3 lakh crore by eliminating ghost and duplicate beneficiaries.
  • Sectoral spread proves integration: CoWIN, GeM, e-NAM, faceless assessment, e-Courts, SVAMITVA drone mapping.
  • Next phase: IndiaAI Mission (2024), Bhashini language AI, AI-assisted CPGRAMS — 4IR technologies inside the state's own workflow.
  • Balance with risks: digital divide (NFHS-5 internet-use gap), exclusion errors, cybersecurity, and DPDP Act 2023 implementation.

Open full model answer →

Q.1610 marks · 150w 9 min Hard

Critically examine the role of WHO in providing global health security during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Subtopic: International Relations · global health governance

Show model answer outline
Introduction (WHO mandate under IHR 2005) → positive contributions (PHEIC declaration, technical guidance, COVAX, Solidarity trials) → failures (delayed alarm, deference to China, weak IHR powers) → structural constraints (earmarked funding, US withdrawal) → reform trajectory (IPPPR, IHR amendments 2024, Pandemic Agreement 2025) → Conclusion
Key points
  • Answer the directive: 'critically examine' requires both the WHO's contributions and its failures, ending with a reasoned judgment.
  • Contributions: PHEIC on 30 January 2020, pandemic declaration on 11 March 2020, universal technical guidance, Solidarity trials, ACT-Accelerator.
  • COVAX (with Gavi and CEPI) delivered close to 2 billion doses to low- and middle-income countries — the largest vaccine-sharing effort in history, yet short of targets.
  • Failures: delayed alarm, deference to early Chinese reporting, initial advice against travel curbs.
  • Structural constraints: IHR 2005 gives no inspection or enforcement powers; ~80% of funding is earmarked voluntary contributions; the 2020 US withdrawal announcement hit finances and legitimacy.
  • Reform trajectory: IPPPR report, IHR amendments (2024), WHO Pandemic Agreement adopted at the 78th World Health Assembly (May 2025).

Open full model answer →

Q.1710 marks · 150w 9 min Easy

‘Indian diaspora has a decisive role to play in the politics and economy of America and European Countries’. Comment with examples.

Subtopic: International Relations · Indian diaspora

Show model answer outline
Introduction (35-million diaspora as a living bridge) → political weight in the US: Harris, Samosa Caucus, swing votes → political rise in Europe: Sunak, Varadkar, Costa → economic clout: CEOs, H-1B dominance, NHS doctors → remittances and lobbying wins (civil nuclear deal) → Conclusion (decisive but not monolithic asset)
Key points
  • Scale: about 35 million NRIs and PIOs — the world's largest diaspora — with its densest influence in the US and the UK.
  • US politics: roughly five million Indian-Americans as swing voters; Kamala Harris's vice-presidency; the Samosa Caucus; the India Caucus among the largest in Congress.
  • European politics: Rishi Sunak (UK Prime Minister), Leo Varadkar (Ireland), António Costa (Portugal, later President of the European Council).
  • Economy: the highest-earning ethnic group in the US; CEOs of Google, Microsoft, IBM and Adobe; over 70% of H-1B visas; NHS reliance on Indian doctors.
  • Record remittances of about US$129 billion in 2024 — the highest received by any country — plus deep investment and startup linkages.
  • Policy leverage: diaspora lobbying aided the 2008 civil nuclear deal and routinely moderates anti-India legislative moves.
  • Caveat: the diaspora is politically diverse, and host-country immigration debates can cut both ways.

Open full model answer →

Q.1815 marks · 250w 14 min Hard

Indian Constitution exhibits centralising tendencies to maintain unity and integrity of the nation. Elucidate in the perspective of the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897; The Disaster Management Act, 2005 and recently passed Farm Acts.

Subtopic: Constitution & Polity · federalism and centralising tendencies

Show model answer outline
Introduction (federation with a unitary bias for unity and integrity) → EDA 1897: state-centric Act with growing central powers (Section 2A, 2020 amendment) → DM Act 2005: binding NDMA directions centralised the COVID response → Farm Acts: Entry 33 List III used to enter State subjects; repeal 2021 → assessment: coordination gains vs bypassed states → Conclusion (consultative federalism via Inter-State Council, Punchhi)
Key points
  • The constitutional tilt: Article 246 supremacy, residuary power (Article 248), emergency provisions, Article 356, All-India Services and single citizenship privilege unity over classical federalism.
  • The EDA 1897 is state-centric (Section 2), but Section 2A and the 2020 amendment expanded central control over transport inspection and nationwide protection of healthcare workers.
  • The DM Act 2005 enabled a centrally decreed national lockdown: binding NDMA/MHA guidelines (Sections 35, 62) and overriding effect (Section 72), though public health is a State subject (Entry 6, List II).
  • The Farm Acts 2020 used Entry 33, List III to reach into agriculture and markets (Entries 14 and 28, List II); states passed counter-Bills and repeal followed in November 2021.
  • Centralisation aids crisis coordination and a unified market but produces one-size-fits-all failures (migrant crisis) and legitimacy deficits when states are bypassed.
  • Way forward: consultative federalism — an active Inter-State Council (Article 263), GST Council-style sectoral councils, and the Punchhi Commission's recommendations.

Open full model answer →

Q.1915 marks · 250w 14 min Hard

Judicial Legislation is antithetical to the doctrine of separation of powers as envisaged in the Indian Constitution. In this context justify the filing of large number of public interest petitions praying for issuing guidelines to executive authorities.

Subtopic: Judiciary · judicial legislation, PIL & separation of powers

Show model answer outline
Introduction → What judicial legislation means and the separation-of-powers objection → Constitutional basis for PILs seeking guidelines (Articles 32, 226, 141, 142) → Vacuum-filling precedents: Vishaka, Vineet Narain, D.K. Basu → Limits: interstitial, temporary, subject to restraint → Conclusion
Key points
  • Separation of powers in India is functional, not absolute — Ram Jawaya Kapur (1955); it is nonetheless part of the basic structure per Kesavananda Bharati (1973).
  • The objection: guideline-making is legislation without democratic accountability, debate or fiscal scrutiny; Articles 50, 121-122 and 211-212 signal mutual restraint.
  • Justification 1: Articles 32 and 226 impose a duty to enforce fundamental rights — a rights vacuum cannot await legislative convenience.
  • Justification 2: judicial guidelines are interstitial and temporary — Vishaka operated only until the POSH Act, 2013 was enacted.
  • Justification 3: they remedy executive inaction — Vineet Narain (CBI autonomy), D.K. Basu (arrest safeguards), enforced through continuing mandamus.
  • Articles 141-142 supply the textual authority; guidelines always yield to subsequent legislation.
  • Balance: judicial restraint on policy and fiscal matters, plus prompt legislative codification, keeps the arrangement within constitutional bounds.

Open full model answer →

Q.2015 marks · 250w 14 min Medium

The strength and sustenance of local institutions in India has shifted from their formative phase of ‘Functions, Functionaries and Funds’ to the contemporary stage of ‘Functionality’. Highlight the critical challenges faced by local institutions in terms of their functionality in recent times.

Subtopic: Governance · local self-government & devolution

Show model answer outline
Introduction → From the 3Fs of the 73rd/74th Amendments to the functionality test → Incomplete devolution and parallel bodies → Fiscal hollowness and tied funds → Personnel, representation and state-control deficits → Way forward → Conclusion
Key points
  • The formative phase secured Functions, Functionaries and Funds through the 73rd/74th Amendments; the contemporary question is whether devolved powers are actually exercisable — functionality.
  • Parallel bodies and line departments (parastatals, smart-city SPVs) hollow out Eleventh and Twelfth Schedule functions despite formal devolution.
  • Fiscal weakness: municipal revenue stagnant at about 1% of GDP (RBI); property tax under-collected; State Finance Commissions delayed and their reports ignored.
  • Tied, scheme-based grants deny local bodies discretion over locally determined priorities.
  • Functionary problem: deputationist staff loyal to state departments and weak planning capacity for GPDPs and municipal budgets.
  • Proxy representation (sarpanch-pati) and rotation of reserved seats weaken elected leadership.
  • Way forward: activity mapping, untied 15th FC direct grants, property-tax reform, RGSA capacity building and empowered Gram Sabhas.

Open full model answer →