Q.110 marks · 150w 9 min Easy
Subtopic: IR · India and its neighbourhood
Show model answer outline
Introduction: India and Nepal share an open border under the 1950 Treaty of Peace and Friendship, with a pegged Nepalese rupee at 1.6 INR and over 6 million Nepalese living in India.
Body: Three dimensions — (i) Irritants: Nepal's Constitution (September 2015) was followed by a Madhesi blockade; the 2020 'new political map' included Kalapani, Lipulekh and Limpiyadhura; the Eminent Persons Group (EPG) report (2018) remains unaccepted; (ii) Connectivity wins: Motihari-Amlekhgunj petroleum pipeline (September 2019, 69 km), Jaynagar-Janakpur railway (April 2022), Arun-III hydropower (900 MW under SJVN); (iii) China factor: Nepal-China Trans-Himalayan Railway feasibility study and 2017 BRI MoU; the pro-China KP Sharma Oli government dissolved in mid-2024 to a Prachanda-Deuba coalition that recalibrated toward Delhi.
Way forward / Conclusion: Receive the EPG report, conclude the long-pending Pancheshwar DPR under the Mahakali Treaty 1996, expand 10,000 MW power-purchase agreements and let states (UP, Bihar) lead micro-cooperation under BBIN MVA.
Key points- Treaty of Peace and Friendship 1950; open border and currency peg (1.6 NPR per INR)
- Nepal Constitution 2015 — Madhesi blockade 2015-16 strained ties
- Nepal's 2020 'new political map' includes Kalapani, Lipulekh, Limpiyadhura (Sino-Indian Mahakali confluence)
- Eminent Persons Group (EPG) report on bilateral framework (2018) — not accepted by India
- Motihari-Amlekhgunj petroleum pipeline (September 2019, 69 km)
- Jaynagar-Janakpur railway (April 2022); Arun-III hydropower 900 MW under SJVN
- Mahakali Treaty 1996 — Pancheshwar multipurpose project DPR pending
Open full model answer →
Q.210 marks · 150w 9 min Easy
Subtopic: IR · India and its neighbourhood
Show model answer outline
Introduction: BIMSTEC, founded in 1997 as BIST-EC and renamed in 2004, links 5 South Asian states (India, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Nepal, Sri Lanka) with 2 Southeast Asian (Myanmar, Thailand). The BIMSTEC Charter entered into force 20 May 2024.
Body: Three dimensions — (i) Strategic value: 22 percent of world population, $5+ trillion combined GDP, Bay of Bengal connectivity bridge for Act East; (ii) Sixth Summit Bangkok (4 April 2025) — Bangkok Vision 2030, BIMSTEC Centre of Excellence on Disaster Management at Noida, BIMSTEC Chamber of Commerce, master plan on transport connectivity; (iii) Limits: pending BIMSTEC Free Trade Agreement (mooted 2004), Myanmar civil war disrupts BIMSTEC Motor Vehicles Agreement, no joint defence framework yet.
Way forward / Conclusion: Close the BIMSTEC FTA, operationalise Kaladan Multi-Modal Transit Project and Trilateral Highway, and make BIMSTEC the Bay of Bengal connectivity backbone alongside MAHASAGAR.
Key points- BIMSTEC — 7 members (India, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Myanmar, Thailand)
- BIMSTEC Charter entered force 20 May 2024
- Sixth Summit Bangkok (4 April 2025) — Bangkok Vision 2030
- BIMSTEC Centre of Excellence on Disaster Management to be hosted at Noida
- 22 percent of world population; $5+ trillion combined GDP
- BIMSTEC FTA stalled since 2004; Master Plan on Transport Connectivity adopted 2022
- Kaladan Multi-Modal Transit Project and India-Myanmar-Thailand Trilateral Highway as physical spines
Open full model answer →
Q.315 marks · 250w 14 min Medium
Subtopic: IR · Bilateral, regional and global groupings
Show model answer outline
Introduction: The Quad (India, US, Japan, Australia) was revived in 2017, elevated to leaders' level in 2021, and at the 2025 Quad summit (rotated to India in 2025) committed to working groups on critical and emerging technologies, supply chains, climate, health, and cybersecurity.
Body: Three dimensions — (i) Convergences: Indo-Pacific Maritime Domain Awareness (IPMDA), Quad Cybersecurity Partnership, Quad Open RAN deployment in Palau and Tuvalu, Critical and Emerging Technology Working Group; (ii) India's distinctive line: refuses NATO-like framing, calls it a 'force for global good', no Section 2 collective defence; (iii) Limits: no permanent secretariat, no joint command, ASEAN centrality strain, and Trump-era trade tariffs (50 percent on Indian goods August 2025) tested cohesion before the 2 February 2026 framework rolled back to 18 percent.
Way forward / Conclusion: Anchor the Quad in deliverables (semiconductor supply chains, undersea cables, dual-use space), preserve issue-based flexibility, and bridge through Quad-Plus with EU and South Korea on tech standards.
Key points- Quad — India, US, Japan, Australia; revived 2017, leaders-level 2021
- Indo-Pacific Maritime Domain Awareness (IPMDA) — 2022 initiative
- Quad summit 2025 — India hosted, Critical and Emerging Tech Working Group expanded
- Quad Open RAN in Palau, Tuvalu, Fiji (with Japan-US backing)
- Quad Cybersecurity Partnership
- US tariffs on India — 50 percent (August 2025), reduced to 18 percent (2 February 2026 framework)
- India's framing — 'force for global good', not a military alliance
- ASEAN centrality reaffirmed in every Quad joint statement
Open full model answer →
Q.415 marks · 250w 14 min Hard
Subtopic: IR · Bilateral, regional and global groupings
Show model answer outline
Introduction: BRICS expanded in January 2024 (Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, UAE) and January 2025 (Indonesia), reaching ten members holding 4.45 billion people and 44 percent of global GDP (PPP) per IMF 2025.
Body: Three dimensions — (i) Weight: 35 percent of world PPP GDP overtook the G7 in 2018; New Development Bank lends in member currencies; (ii) Cohesion failure: 14-15 May 2026 New Delhi foreign ministers' meeting ended without a joint statement; Iran sought condemnation of US-Israel, UAE refused; India issued Chair's Statement and Outcome Document; (iii) Multipolarity verdict: BRICS has weight without strategy; India's line is 'non-Western, not anti-Western'; Jaishankar reiterated India 'has never been for de-dollarisation' and there is 'no proposal for a BRICS currency'.
Way forward / Conclusion: Use BRICS for agenda-setting (UNSC reform, IMF quotas, DPI export, food security), not bloc-building; deepen New Development Bank local-currency lending; resist enlargement that buys breadth at cohesion's cost.
Key points- BRICS — 10 full members after Indonesia joined January 2025; Saudi Arabia invited but not formalised
- Population about 4.45 billion (55.6 percent); 44 percent global GDP (PPP) — IMF July 2025
- 14-15 May 2026 BRICS Foreign Ministers Meeting in New Delhi ended without a joint statement
- Iran-UAE split over Iran-Israel war; India issued Chair's Statement and Outcome Document
- Jaishankar — India 'has never been for de-dollarisation'; no BRICS currency proposal
- New Development Bank — local-currency lending, headquartered in Shanghai (2014)
- PM Modi (Kazan 2024) — BRICS should not 'replace global institutions'
- India's 2026 BRICS chairmanship, Delhi Summit later in year
Open full model answer →
Q.510 marks · 150w 9 min Medium
Subtopic: IR · Bilateral, regional and global groupings
Show model answer outline
Introduction: India's G20 Presidency culminated in the New Delhi Leaders' Declaration (9-10 September 2023), built on the theme Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam — 'One Earth, One Family, One Future'.
Body: Three dimensions — (i) Diplomatic wins: 100 percent consensus despite Ukraine war, AU membership as 21st permanent member, IMEC launched on the sidelines; (ii) Substantive deliverables: Global Biofuels Alliance, DPI as a public good (India Stack export), Voluntary SDG Action Plan, MDB reform agenda; (iii) Continuity: Brazil 2024 (Rio) carried forward, South Africa 2025, Trump's 2026 hosting in jeopardy after Russia-Iran tensions.
Way forward / Conclusion: Use Sherpa-track continuity to lock in DPI standards (Modular Open-Source Identity Platform), keep AU's permanent seat as Global South leverage, and push 2026 successor declaration on critical minerals governance.
Key points- G20 New Delhi Leaders' Declaration adopted 9-10 September 2023
- First G20 consensus during a major-power war; did not name Russia
- African Union admitted as permanent member (21st)
- IMEC MoU signed 9 September 2023 on G20 sidelines
- Global Biofuels Alliance launched (9 September 2023)
- Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam theme — 'One Earth, One Family, One Future'
- DPI declared a 'public good'; G20 Framework for DPI agreed
- India hosted over 200 G20 meetings across 60 cities
Open full model answer →
Q.615 marks · 250w 14 min Hard
Subtopic: IR · Effect of policies of developed/developing countries on India
Show model answer outline
Introduction: India's strategic autonomy was stress-tested when the US imposed a 25 percent reciprocal tariff plus a 25 percent penalty on Indian goods in August 2025, tied to a July 2025 executive order monitoring Russian-oil buyers.
Body: Three dimensions — (i) Pressure metrics: India-US goods trade $129.2 billion (2024); US trade deficit with India $45.7 billion; tariffs landed because the US is India's largest goods export market at 18 percent of exports; (ii) Indian counterplay: Russian crude share rose from 2 percent (2021) to 35.9 percent (FY24); after Rosneft-Lukoil sanctions (21 November 2025), share fell to 21.2 percent by January 2026; (iii) 6 February 2026 framework rolled tariffs back to 18 percent without India officially conceding on Russian oil; Jaishankar reiterated strategic autonomy at Munich 14 February 2026.
Way forward / Conclusion: Diversify oil basket beyond Russia (now from 40 countries), conclude India-US trade pact, push rupee internationalisation rather than de-dollarisation, and harden CAATSA waiver clarity through legislation.
Key points- August 2025 — US tariffs raised to 50 percent on Indian goods (25% reciprocal + 25% penalty)
- Tariff penalty tied to July 2025 US Executive Order on Russian-oil buyers
- Russian oil share — under 1 percent (2021) to 35.9 percent (FY24); fell to 21.2 percent (January 2026)
- 21 November 2025 — US sanctioned Rosneft and Lukoil
- 6 February 2026 — US-India Trade Framework reduced tariffs to 18 percent
- US-India goods trade $129.2 billion (2024); US deficit $45.7 billion
- Jaishankar at Munich (14 February 2026) — India 'wedded to strategic autonomy'
- CAATSA 2017 secondary-sanctions risk on Russian defence and energy
Open full model answer →
Q.710 marks · 150w 9 min Medium
Subtopic: IR · Effect of policies of developed/developing countries on India
Show model answer outline
Introduction: The EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), legislated under Regulation (EU) 2023/956, enters definitive phase from 1 January 2026, imposing a carbon levy on six sectors — iron and steel, aluminium, cement, fertilisers, electricity, hydrogen.
Body: Three dimensions — (i) Trade exposure: India exported about $8.2 billion of CBAM-covered goods to EU in 2023-24, with iron-and-steel and aluminium most exposed; (ii) Equity argument: CBAM violates CBDR-RC principle of UNFCCC and Article 4 of the Paris Agreement; India and BASIC group oppose it as 'green protectionism'; (iii) Domestic response: India proposes its own Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS, 2023), Perform Achieve Trade (PAT) cycle credits, and a domestic carbon price to retain revenue.
Way forward / Conclusion: Bilateral CBAM-equivalence under the India-EU FTA (concluded 27 January 2026), accelerate hydrogen-based steel via National Green Hydrogen Mission, and contest CBAM at WTO under GATT Article XX(b)(g).
Key points- EU CBAM — Regulation (EU) 2023/956; transition Oct 2023-Dec 2025; full phase Jan 2026
- Six sectors covered — iron and steel, aluminium, cement, fertilisers, electricity, hydrogen
- India's CBAM-exposed exports about $8.2 billion (2023-24)
- India-EU FTA negotiations concluded 27 January 2026
- CCTS — Carbon Credit Trading Scheme, India (notified June 2023)
- Common But Differentiated Responsibilities (CBDR-RC) under UNFCCC and Paris Agreement
- BASIC group (Brazil, South Africa, India, China) opposes CBAM
- Potential WTO challenge under GATT Article XX(b)(g) and Article III
Open full model answer →
Q.815 marks · 250w 14 min Hard
Subtopic: IR · Effect of policies of developed/developing countries on India
Show model answer outline
Introduction: China controls about 60 percent of world rare-earth mining but 91 percent of separation and refining and 94 percent of permanent magnets, turning a midstream chokepoint into geopolitical leverage.
Body: Three dimensions — (i) Export-control timeline: gallium-germanium (July 2023), graphite-antimony (2024), seven rare earths (samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium, yttrium) on 4 April 2025, foreign-origin extension 1 December 2025; (ii) India's exposure: 100 percent import-dependent for lithium, cobalt, nickel; China supplies 30.8 percent of India's industrial-goods requirements (GTRI); India-China FY25 trade deficit $99.2 billion; (iii) Response: National Critical Mineral Mission (January 2025, Rs 16,300 crore for 7 years), Khanij Bidesh India Ltd (KABIL) acquisitions in Argentina and Australia, Critical Minerals Initiative under Quad and Mineral Security Partnership.
Way forward / Conclusion: Domestic processing capacity via PLI, strategic stockpiling via NCMM, deep-sea mining licences from International Seabed Authority for Carlsberg Ridge polymetallic nodules, and rare-earth recycling under Battery Waste Management Rules 2022.
Key points- China — 60 percent mining, 91 percent refining, 94 percent permanent magnets
- Export licensing on 7 rare earths from 4 April 2025; foreign-origin extension 1 December 2025
- India — 100 percent import-dependent for lithium, cobalt, nickel
- India-China trade deficit FY25 about $99.2 billion (record)
- National Critical Mineral Mission — January 2025, Rs 16,300 crore for 7 years
- Khanij Bidesh India Ltd (KABIL) — JV of NALCO, HCL, MECL for overseas acquisitions
- Mineral Security Partnership (US-led, India member from June 2023)
- Battery Waste Management Rules 2022 mandate EPR and recycling
Open full model answer →
Q.915 marks · 250w 14 min Medium
Subtopic: IR · Indian diaspora
Show model answer outline
Introduction: India's diaspora — 1.34 crore NRIs plus 2.21 crore PIOs (MEA 2024) — is the largest in the world, with World Bank reporting record FY25 remittances of $135.46 billion, more than India's defence budget.
Body: Three dimensions — (i) Recognition architecture: Pravasi Bharatiya Divas (9 January, marking Gandhi's return from South Africa 1915), OCI card under Citizenship (Amendment) Act 2003, merger of PIO into OCI (2015), Pravasi Bharatiya Samman Award; (ii) Welfare and rights: e-Migrate portal under Emigration Act 1983, MADAD grievance redress, Pravasi Bharatiya Bima Yojana; SVEEP and ECI 2024 amendment for postal voting in select pilot constituencies; (iii) Strategic leverage: Gulf workers (about 9 million) and UAE alone 19 percent of remittances; H-1B Indian-American influence in US tech; UK-India migration mobility partnership (May 2021); Caribbean and Mauritius diasporas in MAHASAGAR.
Way forward / Conclusion: Operationalise diaspora-bond mechanism (RBI), extend overseas voting to OCI cardholders, ratify ILO C-189 to protect women domestic-worker migrants, and use diaspora networks in IMEC and African countries.
Key points- Indian diaspora — 1.34 crore NRIs + 2.21 crore PIOs = 3.55 crore (MEA Annual Report 2024)
- Remittances $135.46 billion in FY25 (World Bank), largest in the world
- UAE accounts for about 19 percent of remittances; Gulf (GCC) about 40 percent
- Pravasi Bharatiya Divas — 9 January, commemorating Gandhi's return from South Africa (9 January 1915)
- Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) card under Citizenship (Amendment) Act 2003
- PIO card merged into OCI in 2015
- Emigration Act 1983 governs ECR clearance for 18 ECR countries
- MADAD portal and e-Migrate portal under MEA Overseas Indian Affairs
Open full model answer →
Q.1010 marks · 150w 9 min Easy
Subtopic: IR · Indian diaspora
Show model answer outline
Introduction: The Immigration and Foreigners Act 2025 (received Presidential assent 4 April 2025) repeals the Passport (Entry into India) Act 1920, Registration of Foreigners Act 1939, Foreigners Act 1946 and Immigration (Carriers' Liability) Act 2000.
Body: Three dimensions — (i) Consolidation: single statute for entry, stay, exit, deportation; Bureau of Immigration with statutory backing; e-Visa regime formalised; (ii) Strengthens diaspora links: clearer regime for OCI cardholders, biometric verification, faster deportation of overstaying foreigners; (iii) Concerns: Section 3 wide governmental discretion; civil-society worry on bonafide refugees absent UNHCR refugee convention ratification; Tibetan and Rohingya communities outside Bureau registry.
Way forward / Conclusion: Notify Refugee Bill 2023 to plug the protection gap, expand Mobility and Migration Partnerships (Germany 2022, UK 2021, Australia 2023), and equip BoI with AI-based facial recognition under DPDP Act 2023.
Key points- Immigration and Foreigners Act 2025 — assent 4 April 2025
- Repeals four colonial-era laws (1920, 1939, 1946, 2000)
- Statutory Bureau of Immigration
- India is non-signatory to 1951 UN Refugee Convention and 1967 Protocol
- Mobility partnerships — UK (2021), Germany (2022), Australia (2023)
- OCI cardholders status clarified; e-Visa regime formalised
- Section 3 allows wide government discretion on entry/exit
Open full model answer →
Q.1115 marks · 250w 14 min Medium
Subtopic: IR · Relations with major powers — US
Show model answer outline
Introduction: Since the India-US Joint Strategic Vision for Asia-Pacific (2015) the partnership has moved from buyer-seller to a Major Defence Partner (2016) and an Initiative on Critical and Emerging Technology (iCET, January 2023).
Body: Three dimensions — (i) Defence breakthroughs: GE F414 jet-engine co-production MoU (June 2023, for Tejas Mk2), 31 MQ-9B SeaGuardian drones ($3.5 billion, 2024), Sonobuoy MoU between Ultra Maritime and Bharat Dynamics (2024); (ii) Technology: iCET extended to next-gen telecoms, AI, biotech, advanced materials; India joined Mineral Security Partnership (June 2023); (iii) Frictions: 50 percent tariffs (August 2025) until 6 February 2026 framework; Russia oil dispute; H-1B visa cap; US Department of Justice indictment of Indian officials over Pannun assassination plot (November 2023).
Way forward / Conclusion: Finalise India-US bilateral trade pact, operationalise General Security of Military Information Agreement (GSOMIA) and Communications Compatibility and Security Agreement (COMCASA) end-use, and ensure semiconductor co-fab via Tata Electronics-Analog Devices.
Key points- Major Defence Partner status — 2016 (designated)
- Foundational agreements — LEMOA (2016), COMCASA (2018), BECA (2020)
- iCET launched January 2023 (NSA-level)
- GE F414 jet engine co-production MoU — June 2023 (for HAL Tejas Mk2)
- 31 MQ-9B SeaGuardian drones — $3.5 billion procurement (2024)
- Sonobuoy MoU — Ultra Maritime + Bharat Dynamics (2024)
- Mineral Security Partnership (India joined June 2023)
- Pannun plot DoJ indictment (November 2023) — irritant
Open full model answer →
Q.1215 marks · 250w 14 min Medium
Subtopic: IR · Relations with major powers — Russia
Show model answer outline
Introduction: The India-Russia 'Special and Privileged Strategic Partnership' (2010) re-extended its 2001 friendship treaty during the Putin-Xi May 2026 Beijing meeting, just as India recalibrates its defence and energy basket.
Body: Three dimensions — (i) Defence diversification: SIPRI 2025 — Russia 70 percent (2011-15) to 40 percent (2021-25); France 29 percent, Israel 15 percent; S-400 (5 contracted 2018, 3 delivered, 2 delayed by Russia-Ukraine war); BrahMos JV; AK-203 Korwa JV; (ii) Energy pivot: Russian crude 1 percent (2021) to 35.9 percent (FY24); fell to 21.2 percent (January 2026) after Rosneft-Lukoil sanctions (21 November 2025); record near 2.3 million b/d in early May 2026; (iii) Strategic limits: Russia's deepening dependence on China; Putin-Xi May 2026 visit re-extended 2001 friendship treaty; RIC dormant since Galwan 2020.
Way forward / Conclusion: Continue defence diversification (FRAM Indian-design GE F414), retain Russia for spares and overhaul, push rupee-rouble trade settlement, and treat Russia as one card in multialignment not the ace.
Key points- Russia's share of India arms imports — 70 percent (2011-15) to 40 percent (2021-25) per SIPRI 2025
- S-400 'Triumf' — 5 systems contracted 2018; 3 delivered; remaining delayed
- BrahMos cruise missile JV (1998); Philippines export (2022)
- Indo-Russian Rifles Private Ltd — AK-203 Korwa (Amethi) plant
- Russian crude — under 1 percent (2021) to 35.9 percent (FY24); 21.2 percent (January 2026)
- Special and Privileged Strategic Partnership since 2010
- Annual summit format (paused 2022-2023; Modi visit Moscow July 2024)
- Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant — 6 VVER-1000 reactors with Rosatom
Open full model answer →
Q.1315 marks · 250w 14 min Hard
Subtopic: IR · Relations with major powers — China
Show model answer outline
Introduction: The 21 October 2024 patrolling arrangement at Depsang and Demchok closed the last two friction points from the 2020 Galwan stand-off. Modi-Xi held the first bilateral in five years at BRICS Kazan (23 October 2024).
Body: Three dimensions — (i) Vocabulary: 'disengagement on patrolling' is not 'de-escalation' (force-thinning) or 'normalisation' (boundary resolution); (ii) Friction points cleared — Galwan, Pangong Tso, Gogra-Hot Springs (PP15/17A), Depsang Bulge, Demchok; (iii) Outstanding: WMCC (Working Mechanism for Consultation and Coordination on India-China Border Affairs) on confidence-building; LAC infrastructure asymmetry (Bharatmala-LAC roads now match China side); India-China trade deficit $99.2 billion FY25; visa relaxation for journalists and direct flights restored (2025).
Way forward / Conclusion: Sequence disengagement to de-escalation to normalisation per Special Representatives mechanism (33rd round 18 December 2024), resume Mansarovar Yatra under bilateral consular protocols, and maintain LAC infrastructure plus Mountain Strike Corps as deterrents.
Key points- Galwan clash 15 June 2020 — 20 Indian and 4 Chinese soldiers killed
- Patrolling arrangement at Depsang and Demchok — 21 October 2024
- Modi-Xi bilateral at Kazan BRICS — 23 October 2024 (first in 5 years)
- WMCC and Special Representatives mechanisms
- 33rd round of SR talks — 18 December 2024 (NSA Doval and FM Wang Yi)
- Five friction points cleared — Galwan, Pangong, Gogra-Hot Springs, Depsang, Demchok
- India-China trade deficit FY25 about $99.2 billion (record)
- Direct flights resumed 2025; e-visa for Chinese tourists restored (April 2025)
Open full model answer →
Q.1415 marks · 250w 14 min Medium
Subtopic: IR · Important International Institutions
Show model answer outline
Introduction: The UN Charter (Article 23) fixed the five permanent members (P5) in 1945. The Pact for the Future, adopted 22 September 2024 at the UN Summit of the Future, commits to UNSC reform without specifying timelines.
Body: Three dimensions — (i) India's case: founding member, fifth-largest economy, largest UN troop contributor (over 2.75 lakh peacekeepers since 1948), G20 host, 1.4 billion people; eighth non-permanent term (2021-22); (ii) Reform tracks: G4 (India, Japan, Germany, Brazil) joint candidature for permanent seats; Uniting for Consensus (Italy, Pakistan, etc.) opposes; African Union 'Ezulwini Consensus' (2005) demands 2 African permanent seats; (iii) Obstacles: P5 veto on amendments (Article 108), text-based negotiations stalled in Intergovernmental Negotiations (IGN) since 2008.
Way forward / Conclusion: Move IGN to text-based negotiations, build a G4-AU bridge under Ezulwini, secure African Union as 21st G20 member as a template, and tie reform to the UN's 80th-anniversary review (2025-26).
Key points- UN Security Council — 5 permanent + 10 non-permanent members under Article 23
- Pact for the Future adopted 22 September 2024 at UN Summit of the Future
- G4 — India, Japan, Germany, Brazil (joint candidacy for permanent seats)
- Uniting for Consensus (UfC) bloc — Italy, Pakistan, Mexico, South Korea, Argentina, Spain
- African Union Ezulwini Consensus (2005) — 2 permanent African seats with veto
- India 8th non-permanent term 2021-22; largest UN peacekeeping contributor
- Intergovernmental Negotiations (IGN) on UNSC reform stalled since 2008
- Article 108 — amendments need 2/3 GA + ratification by 2/3 members including all P5
Open full model answer →
Q.1510 marks · 150w 9 min Hard
Subtopic: IR · Important International Institutions
Show model answer outline
Introduction: The WTO's two-tier dispute settlement system (DSU 1994) has had a paralysed Appellate Body since December 2019, when the US blocked new judges. MC13 in Abu Dhabi (February 2024) failed to revive it.
Body: Three dimensions — (i) Paralysis impact: 'appeal into the void' tactic by losing parties; 30+ pending appeals as of 2025; Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA) — 53 members, India outside; (ii) India's interests: WTO panel ruled against India in ICT tariffs case (April 2023); India's challenge to EU CBAM hinges on appellate review; (iii) Reform agenda: MC13 mandated 'fully and well-functioning DS system by 2024' but no progress; agriculture and Public Stockholding (PSH) permanent solution still pending.
Way forward / Conclusion: Join the MPIA pragmatically to protect interim rulings, push G20 trade ministers on DS reform, defend PSH at MC14 (Cameroon 2026), and use WTO TRIPS Section 31bis flexibility for pharma exports.
Key points- WTO Appellate Body paralysed since 11 December 2019
- Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA) — 53 members; India not a party
- MC13 Abu Dhabi (26 February-2 March 2024) — failed to revive AB
- Permanent solution to Public Stockholding (Bali 2013) still pending
- WTO ICT tariffs case — India ruled to have violated MFN obligations (April 2023)
- MC14 to be hosted by Cameroon in March 2026
- DSU Article 17 — Appellate Body must have 7 members
- 'Appeal into the void' — losing party files dummy appeal to suspend panel ruling
Open full model answer →
Q.1610 marks · 150w 9 min Medium
Subtopic: IR · Important International Institutions
Show model answer outline
Introduction: The IPCC AR6 Synthesis Report (March 2023) warned that the 1.5 degree pathway requires global GHG emissions to peak before 2025 and decline 43 percent by 2030 (relative to 2019).
Body: Three dimensions — (i) India's Updated NDC (August 2022): 45 percent reduction in emissions intensity of GDP by 2030 (from 2005), 50 percent non-fossil installed capacity, net zero by 2070; LIFE (Lifestyle for Environment) added at COP27; (ii) COP30 Belem (November 2025) — India pushed CBDR-RC, Loss and Damage Fund operationalisation (post-COP28), and a Just Transition narrative; (iii) Domestic delivery: 232 GW renewable capacity (March 2026), Green Hydrogen Mission (Rs 19,744 crore), India SDG Index score 71/100 (NITI Aayog 2023-24).
Way forward / Conclusion: Submit NDC 3.0 in 2025-26 cycle, push Loss and Damage finance from developed countries ($300 billion New Collective Quantified Goal at COP29), and align CCTS with EU CBAM equivalence.
Key points- IPCC AR6 SYR — March 2023; 1.5 degree path needs peak before 2025
- India Updated NDC (August 2022) — 45 percent emission-intensity reduction by 2030; 50 percent non-fossil capacity
- Net Zero by 2070 (Glasgow COP26 announcement)
- LIFE — Lifestyle for Environment, India initiative at COP27
- COP30 Belem (Brazil, November 2025) hosted by Brazil
- Loss and Damage Fund operationalised at COP28 Dubai (2023)
- New Collective Quantified Goal — $300 billion per year by 2035 (COP29 Baku 2024)
- India's installed renewable capacity 232 GW (March 2026); target 500 GW by 2030
Open full model answer →
Q.1710 marks · 150w 9 min Easy
Subtopic: IR · Relations with major powers — EU
Show model answer outline
Introduction: India-EU FTA negotiations, paused since 2013, restarted in June 2022 alongside the Trade and Technology Council (TTC) and concluded on 27 January 2026, creating a trade zone covering 2 billion people and roughly a quarter of world GDP.
Body: Three dimensions — (i) Architecture: FTA + Investment Protection Agreement (IPA) + Geographical Indications (GI) Agreement; tariff cuts on autos, wines and spirits, dairy; (ii) Residual chapters: CBAM equivalence dispute, public procurement, mode-4 services (movement of natural persons), Sustainability and Trade chapter referencing ILO core conventions; (iii) Strategic value: EU is India's largest trading partner ($137.4 billion in 2023-24 for goods); buttresses IMEC; counterweight to RCEP that India did not join.
Way forward / Conclusion: Ratify across 27 EU national parliaments and the European Parliament, sequence CBAM equivalence with India's CCTS, and use Trade and Technology Council for semiconductors and AI governance.
Key points- India-EU FTA negotiations concluded 27 January 2026
- EU is India's largest trading partner — $137.4 billion in goods (2023-24)
- FTA + Investment Protection Agreement + Geographical Indications package
- EU Trade and Technology Council launched June 2022
- CBAM equivalence and Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS) dispute
- Mode-4 services (movement of natural persons) remains contested
- Sustainability and Trade chapter — ILO core conventions
Open full model answer →
Q.1815 marks · 250w 14 min Medium
Subtopic: IR · Geoeconomics — critical minerals
Show model answer outline
Introduction: The Union Cabinet approved the National Critical Mineral Mission on 29 January 2025 with Rs 16,300 crore outlay over 7 years plus expected Rs 18,000 crore PSU investment, in response to weaponised mineral chokepoints.
Body: Three dimensions — (i) Vulnerability: India 100 percent import-dependent for lithium, cobalt, nickel; China refines 91 percent of rare earths; the 4 April 2025 Chinese export licensing on 7 rare earths cut yttrium, dysprosium and terbium exports about 50 percent below baseline; (ii) NCMM architecture: 30 critical minerals notified, Geological Survey of India to do 1,200 exploration projects, offshore mineral block auctions under Offshore Areas Mineral (Development and Regulation) Amendment Act 2023; (iii) International: Khanij Bidesh India Ltd (KABIL), Mineral Security Partnership (June 2023), Quad Critical Minerals Initiative.
Way forward / Conclusion: Domestic processing capacity via PLI, strategic stockpiling (US DPA Title III model), International Seabed Authority licences for Carlsberg Ridge polymetallic nodules, and rare-earth recycling under Battery Waste Management Rules 2022.
Key points- National Critical Mineral Mission approved 29 January 2025; Rs 16,300 crore outlay over 7 years
- 30 critical minerals notified by Ministry of Mines (2023)
- India 100 percent import-dependent for lithium, cobalt and nickel
- China — 91 percent rare-earth refining, 94 percent permanent magnets
- 4 April 2025 — Chinese licensing on 7 heavy/medium rare earths
- Khanij Bidesh India Ltd (KABIL) — JV of NALCO-HCL-MECL
- Mineral Security Partnership (India joined June 2023, US-led)
- Offshore Areas Mineral (Development and Regulation) Amendment Act 2023
Open full model answer →
Q.1910 marks · 150w 9 min Medium
Subtopic: IR · Geoeconomics — semiconductors
Show model answer outline
Introduction: The India Semiconductor Mission (December 2021) anchors Programme for Development of Semiconductors and Display Manufacturing Ecosystem in India with Rs 76,000 crore outlay, expanded under ISM 2.0 in 2024.
Body: Three dimensions — (i) Approved units: Tata Electronics-PSMC fab in Dholera ($11 billion, 28 nm), Tata OSAT in Jagiroad, Micron OSAT in Sanand ($2.75 billion), Kaynes ATMP, CG Power-Renesas ATMP; (ii) Strategic logic: friend-shoring under US CHIPS Act 2022 dynamics, JIST trilateral with US and Japan, Quad Semiconductor Supply Chain Initiative; (iii) Limits: most approvals are packaging-assembly-test (OSAT) rather than leading-edge fabrication; talent gap of 250,000-300,000 engineers per the India Electronics and Semiconductor Association; capital-intensive long gestation.
Way forward / Conclusion: Move from 28 nm to 14 nm via Tata-PSMC roadmap, scale design-linked incentives for fabless start-ups under DLI scheme, and use iCET technology agreement for advanced lithography access.
Key points- India Semiconductor Mission — December 2021; Rs 76,000 crore (PLI + DLI)
- Tata Electronics-PSMC fab Dholera — $11 billion, 28 nm
- Micron OSAT Sanand — $2.75 billion (June 2023 approval)
- Tata OSAT Jagiroad (Assam)
- CG Power-Renesas-Stars Microelectronics ATMP
- Design-Linked Incentive (DLI) scheme for fabless start-ups
- Mostly OSAT/ATMP — not yet leading-edge fabrication
- Quad Semiconductor Supply Chain Initiative; JIST (US-Japan-India) trilateral
Open full model answer →
Q.2015 marks · 250w 14 min Hard
Subtopic: IR · Geoeconomics — energy security
Show model answer outline
Introduction: India imports about 88-89 percent of its crude oil, burning about 5.5 million b/d (2026). The Strait of Hormuz, only 33 km wide at its narrowest, carries about 20 million b/d (20 percent of world's petroleum-liquids trade).
Body: Three dimensions — (i) Hormuz exposure: India took 30-40 percent of crude via Hormuz in Feb-March 2026; by March 2026 about 70 percent of crude was arriving outside Hormuz from 40 countries, up from 55 percent a year earlier; (ii) Diversification levers: Russia top supplier (about 30-35 percent), US imports up 31 percent YoY (December 2025), West African and Latin American expansion; (iii) Strategic reserves and infrastructure: 5.33 MMT Strategic Petroleum Reserve at Visakhapatnam, Mangalore and Padur (Phase I); Phase II at Chandikhol and Padur expansion; LNG import terminals; PM Surya Ghar (rooftop solar) and 500 GW non-fossil 2030 target.
Way forward / Conclusion: Expand SPR to 90-day IEA cover, accelerate biofuels (E20 by 2025), operationalise National Green Hydrogen Mission, and treat critical-mineral access as energy-security adjacency.
Key points- India imports about 88-89 percent of crude; burns about 5.5 million b/d (2026)
- Strait of Hormuz — 33 km wide, carries 20 million b/d (about 20 percent of world petroleum liquids)
- India sourced crude from about 40 countries by March 2026
- Strategic Petroleum Reserve — 5.33 MMT (Phase I: Visakhapatnam, Mangalore, Padur)
- Russian crude 35.9 percent (FY24); fell to 21.2 percent (January 2026)
- I2U2 grouping (India, Israel, UAE, US) — July 2022
- Chabahar terminal operations; US sanctions waiver expired 26 April 2026
- E20 ethanol blending and PM Surya Ghar Muft Bijli Yojana (Feb 2024)
Open full model answer →